Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (3 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   5 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Fundamentalist Christians 1: Everyone Else 0

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Robert De Filippis     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 9/4/13

Author 86186
Become a Fan
  (29 fans)

From Light on the Bible
Light on the Bible
(Image by GlasgowAmateur)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
br />Light on the Bible by GlasgowAmateur

I couldn't have come up with a more effective explanation of why it is impossible to have a rational discussion about religion with fundamentalist Christians. I found this in a piece by   David Ferguson on the

"Presuppositional apologetics is a school of theological thought that says all rational thought flows forth from the word of God and that no science or scholarly investigation is possible without first accepting that the Bible is the word of God and absolutely true. Outside of that belief system, it says, there is no possible basis for argument with a non-Christian because everything they believe is false."

There you have it in a nutshell. The rest of the world is wrong!

Let's deconstruct this claim from Dr. Jason Lisle of the Institute for Creation Research.   First, his premise is faulty on its face: "Rational thought that flows from the word of God" is a theory dependent model of reality based on human theories about reality. The Bible consists of ( sometimes coherent and other times incoherent) theory dependent models created by human beings during a time of blind ignorance of the nature and workings of objective reality. In other words, human explanations for natural phenomena that wasn't understood.

The next argument is "God inspired the humans who wrote the Bible." Again, the concept of an anthropomorphic God is a human construct. It is a theory dependent model that projects an omniscient and omnipotent entity onto the universe and its workings.

Suffice to say, every explanation of reality is a human theory -- even science.

Now this form of apologetics has found the final method of picking and choosing what to believe and ignoring the fact that everything we consider objective evidence comes from subjective interpretation.

I repeat! Every law, theory, hypothesis, and explanation of reality is ultimately subjective. Consequently, they depend upon theoretical models created by humans.

The difference is, science continues to question and presuppositional apologetics has found a way to defend itself by closing itself from further investigation.

In other words, for presuppositional apologetics to have legitimacy to those who profess it, it must remain closed to every other form of reasoning. Its primary axiom does exactly that. And by doing so, its legitimacy is limited only to those who accept its premises.

So why do I care if an isolated group of people want to defend their beliefs with this kind of recursive thinking? I don't until they're not isolated and begin to influence the rest of us through their pressure on government.

These folks are making inroads in education by promoting religion as science. In those states where laws have been passed allowing this transgression, the children are being robbed of their futures. As a country, our ability to compete in a modern world is diminished.

Our current lack of science research funding is causing our scientists to consider moving to other countries, while powerful lobbies are using religion and anti-scientific sentiment to benefit their short term business agendas.

This kind of nonsense is the latest phase in the dumbing down of America. How much further can it go? How about Christian Televangelist, Pat Robertson, claiming that gay men in San Francisco wear special rings that give you the AIDS virus when you shake their hands. Is that dumb enough for you?

But wait. He can't be right. So far I haven't been able to find evidence for his claim in the Bible.

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Author, columnist, and blogger with a long career in business management, management consulting and executive coaching. I've authored and published six books: "You, Your Self and the 21st Century,"The Flowers Are Talking to Me," and "Faith (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Illinois Is Now on Board. We Can Carry Concealed Weapons in Every State.

Don't be Fooled: Black Racism Causes White Racism

The Primary American Meme: Be Afraid.

What Jesus said and What the Christian Lunatic Fringe Hears.

This Pope Makes Me Want to be an Atheist

Ethan Couch: An Example of the Pathology of Wealth