When President Franklin D. Roosevelt made plans to run for a third
term in 1940 he decided to drop conservative Vice President John Nance
Garner from the ticket, both because Garner disapproved of Roosevelt
running again and Garner's opposition to much of the New Deal. Instead
Roosevelt chose Secretary of Agriculture Henry Wallace.
However, many of Garner's fellow conservative Democrats, including the party's reactionary wing based in the South, despised Wallace for his liberalism and attempted to block his nomination at the convention before Roosevelt's arrival. The book American Dreamer: A Life of Henry A. Wallace describes what happened next:
At the White House, Franklin Roosevelt sat in the Oval Room playing solitaire, listening to the proceedings with growing disgust"It was a hot, humid evening in Washington, and Roosevelt was out of patience. Suddenly he reached for a pad and began to scribble. Shortly he handed his notes to [federal judge and confidant] Sam Rosenman and told him to "clean it up" because he might have to "deliver it quickly."
Below is the letter which Roosevelt drafted, in which he vowed not to
run if his fellow Democrats blocked his choice of Wallace. (In the end
the letter was never sent, as a speech by Eleanor Roosevelt turned the
tide for Wallace at the convention.) Roosevelt's letter, with its
powerful critique of the Democratic Party, was published almost nowhere
and was essentially unknown before it appeared in Oliver Stone's new
Showtime documentary series Untold History of the United States:
July 18, 1940
Members of the Convention:
In the century in which we live, the Democratic Party has received the support of the electorate only when the party, with absolute clarity, has been the champion of progressive and liberal policies and principles of government.
The party has failed consistently when through political trading and chicanery it has fallen into the control of those interests, personal and financial, which think in terms of dollars instead of in terms of human values.
The Republican Party has made its nominations this year at the dictation of those who, we all know, always place money ahead of human progress.
The Democratic Convention, as appears clear from the events of today, is divided on this fundamental issue. Until the Democratic Party through this convention makes overwhelmingly clear its stand in favor of social progress and liberalism, and shakes off all the shackles of control fastened upon it by the forces of conservatism, reaction, and appeasement, it will not continue its march of victory.
It is without question that certain political influences pledged to reaction in domestic affairs and to appeasement in foreign affairs have been busily engaged behind the scenes in the promotion of discord since this Convention convened.
Under these circumstances, I cannot, in all honor, and will not, merely for political expediency, go along with the cheap bargaining and political maneuvering which have brought about party dissension in this convention.
It is best not to straddle ideals.