Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 6 (6 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   9 comments
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Fourth Piece: Are You Being Guided, Mr. President, by the Wrong Advisor?

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Andrew Bard Schmookler     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Funny 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 8/26/09

Author 53
Become a Fan
  (31 fans)
I've proposed that you changed your approach once you became president
from the one that brought you to the presidency. (And I've argued
that this was a mistake, because the secret to your power is staying
connected with the moral and spiritual force that drove your amazing
swift ascent to the most powerful office in the world.)


The question arises: Why this change in your path following Inauguration Day?


I can't claim to know, but I have a strong suspicion.


It might be that you had too strong a compartmentalization in your mind
between running for office, on the one hand, and governing, on the
other. So perhaps when it came time to change from campaigning to
running a government, you over-did the transition, forgetting the true
engine of your power.


It might also be that you felt unready for the realities of the awesome
power you were now in a position to wield in the world. So
swiftly rising from obscurity to such huge potential power, you perhaps
chose (unconsciously one would suppose) to inhibit yourself by holding
back on exercising the true source of your power.


But my suspicion is that the problem lies elsewhere. My guess is
that between the campaign and Inauguration, THE PRINCIPLE ADVISORS
SHAPING YOUR STRATEGY CHANGED.


I suspect this for two reasons.


First, in the team that ran your exceptionally effective campaign, Rahm
Emmanuel was not included. Yet as you became president, he became
your right-hand man. The change in central advisors corresponds
in time with your change in approach.


Second, if I read Rahm Emmanuel's nature correctly, despite his
undoubted brilliance and capability, he is not a man who'd understand
well the nature and power of the moral and spiritual force that, as
I've argued, are what brought you into the presidency.


Emmanuel seems like one of those hard-headed "realists" who are great
with dealing with the conventional realities of the world. But
the problem with such realists is that they tend to be blind to some
realities that can be the most powerful. (Like the CIA analysts
who thought the Shah was impregnable and had no inkling that a
religious leader like Khomeini might bring him down.)


You've been governing like a man who has greatly underestimated the
potential power of his leadership, and my suspicion is that it's
because you've been guided in your presidency by the strategic advice
of a man to whom a large part of your potential power is invisible.


Someone whose worldview does not recognize the power of moral and
spiritual inspiration to move the world will hardly be able to make the
best possible strategic judgments about how you should conduct your
battles. He will not be able either to judge well how to use your
most powerful weapons, or to weigh insightfully how their use will
impact the outcome of battle.


If I am correct in my intuitive speculation about Emmanuel's
abilitiies and limitations, then I would suggest that Emmanuel's
role should be limited to tactical and operational matters. His
voice should not weigh heavily in devising your overall strategy-- in
general or with respect to particular issues.


Presumably, the people with whom you worked during your campaign
understand how to tap into that moral and spiritual force that worked
so well in bringing you to the presidency. Possibly, that team
needs to be supplemented by others who understand how to tap into the
visionary dimension and to wed it to practical politics. But your
campaign suggests that between you and others, like Axelrod and Gibbs,
there's already understanding enough to re-connect you with the Force
that can make you a powerful, effective, transformational president.


Turn back to the places from which ideas came like the staging and crafting of the speech in Grant Park on November 4th.

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Funny 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Andy Schmookler, an award-winning author, political commentator, radio talk-show host, and teacher, was the Democratic nominee for Congress from Virginia's 6th District. His new book -- written to have an impact on the central political battle of our time -- is (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Do Conservatives Like Colbert? Article Plus Critique

Mel Gibson's Rant as Profound Clue

To Anti-Obamite Lefties: It Doesn't Matter If You're Right

How Important is the Loss of Friendship?

# 8 Beliefs that Make Liberal America Weak: Barriers to the Source of Moral and Spiritual Passions

The Mystery of Obama's Relationship with Power