Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 5 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
General News    H2'ed 7/24/10

Former Intel CEO Denounces Outsourcing

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   1 comment
Message Joshua Sanders
Andy Grove, former CEO of Intel, the world's largest maker of computer chips, knows that outsourcing is destroying Middle America and our economy. In the July 1 issue of Business Week, he had this to say:
"You could say that shipping jobs overseas is no big deal because the high-value work -- and much of the profits -- remain in the U.S. But what kind of a society are we going to have if it consists of highly paid people doing high-value-added work, and masses of unemployed?"
This is not a man to ignore. In 1997, Grove earned Time Magazine's Man of the Year, CEO magazine's CEO of the Year and Industry Week's Technology Leader of the Year. In 2001, he won the Strategic Management Society's Lifetime Achievement Award. Furthermore, according to a cited Wikipedia entry...
"Grove is credited with having transformed Intel from a manufacturer of memory chips into one of the world's dominant producers of microprocessors. During his tenure as CEO, Grove oversaw a 4,500% increase in Intel's market capitalization from $4 billion to $197 billion, making it, at the time, the world's most valuable company."
So what does such an accredited Andy Grove have to say about the American economy and its abysmal presence of manufacturing jobs and infrastructure? He says that we cannot rely on start-ups to bring innovation to America. Sure, they're great, but in the end we need to have a manufacturing infrastructure in the U.S. to "scale up" when the innovation goes from prototype to mass production. During the scale-up process, "They [companies] work out design details, figure out how to make things affordably, build factories, and hire people by the thousands. Scaling is hard work but necessary to make innovation matter."

Even if the creation of a product occurs in the U.S., if companies send all of the capital into foreign companies, nothing in terms of U.S. jobs will be created. Proponents of outsourcing argue that it doesn't matter where stuff is built, as long as the initial prototype and the maker reside here. However, such logic and practices have caused the U.S. economy to erode and has only succeeded in improving the short-term margins of companies as the U.S. job machine continues sputtering.

Grove points out that in the U.S, manufacturing employment in the computer industry, currently at 166,000 jobs, is actually lower now than it was in 1975, before the first PC was ever assembled! Meanwhile, Foxconn, an Asian computer manufacturing industry has emerged in Asia and employs more than Apple, Dell, Microsoft, Hewlett-Packard, Intel and Sony combined, worldwide. Foxconn's revenues last year were $62 billion, larger than Microsoft, Dell, or Intel.

Grove highlights that there's more at stake than exported jobs.
"With some technologies, both scaling and innovation take place overseas. Such is the case with advanced batteries. It has taken years and many false starts, but finally we are about to witness mass-produced electric cars and trucks. They all rely on lithium-ion batteries. What microprocessors are to computing, batteries are to electric vehicles. Unlike with microprocessors, the U.S. share of lithium-ion battery production is tiny."
This is a problem. Without an effective ecosystem to accumulate the technology, no experience is gained or built, and no relationship is made between supplier and customer. When this new trend of electric cars charged by batteries really takes off, the U.S. is going to be left in the dust. "U.S. companies did not participate in the first phase [of battery development] and consequently were not in the running for all that followed. I doubt they will ever catch up," writes Grove.

If the U.S. ever plans to recover from its economic tailspin, we need to focus our efforts on job creation. The rapid development of Asian economies can be accounted for by their state economic policy, which places job creation as the number one priority. As Grove says, "the government plays a strategic role in setting the priorities and arraying the forces and organization necessary to achieve this goal [job creation]."

Our government better get on the right track, because its current strategies are not working.
Rate It | View Ratings

Joshua Sanders Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Writes for Attends school at The Ohio State University, part-time, earning a BS in Business Finance.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Former Intel CEO Denounces Outsourcing

Baby Boomers Experience Murphy's Law Firsthand

Obama's New Stimulus: Will it Work?

Halvorson Understands America's Perils

A Look into China's Emergent Political Economy

Fighting "Rational Terrorism"

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend