Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 7 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 9/8/19

For The US And Iran, War Is Not An Option

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   1 comment
Author 501501
Message Alon Ben-Meir
Become a Fan
  (1 fan)

From Alon Ben-Meir Website

Benjamin Netanyahu: .Iran must be stopped.
Benjamin Netanyahu: .Iran must be stopped.
(Image by YouTube, Channel: FRANCE 24 English)
  Details   DMCA

Trump's decision to withdraw from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA, or Iran deal) was sadly based on a lack of understanding of its importance and potential contribution to a future nuclear-free zone in the Middle East. Even without knowing the nuances of the deal, Trump's decision to withdraw from it was based on his pledge to do so when he was campaigning for president and his determination to undo President Obama's signature achievement. Moreover, Prime Minister Netanyahu, who vehemently opposed the deal, was able to persuade Trump to abrogate it with the full backing of American evangelicals, whose political support Trump needs.

From the onset, the Obama administration understood that the Iran deal would substantially slow Iran's nuclear development program in a number of stages for 10-25 years. None of the signatories to the deal believed that Iran would necessarily abandon its ambition to acquire nuclear weapons. Nevertheless, they all agreed that during this period, continuing efforts must be made by all parties to build on the deal to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons and normalize its foreign relations.

By allowing Iran to reap political and economic benefits through the removal of the sanctions and normalization of relations with the US and its allies, and being assured that the US has no design toward regime change, Iran would feel secure while enjoying a thriving economy. This would mitigate its external threats and render the acquisition of nuclear weapons unnecessary, and in fact undesirable, as it would once again isolate Iran and subject it to new crippling sanctions, severely undermining the progress it had made in the interim.

The development of events since the US withdrew from the deal made Trump and Netanyahu realize that the withdrawal was a mistake. Iran assumed an even harder line, refused to end its nefarious activities, and continues to weather the nearly crippling sanctions. Netanyahu's hope that Trump would potentially attack Iran's nuclear facilities and bring about a regime change failed to materialize, and his optimism that Iran will succumb in the face of sanctions turned out to be misplaced.

Realizing the potentially dire consequences of a war with Iran, Trump is determined not to initiate any hostility against Tehran. Following Iran's downing of an American spy drone in June, Trump rescinded his order to retaliate against Iranian targets, fearing unnecessary escalation. Iran's resiliency and its readiness to counter any American attack, even at the expense of suffering major losses and destruction, persuaded Trump, to the chagrin of Netanyahu, that only negotiations would solve the conflict with Iran.

Moreover, although technically the Europeans continue to adhere to the deal, a significant reduction in trade with Iran has occurred due to US pressure, even though the Europeans want to preserve the deal and view it as an instrument to contain crises in the region. If this trend continues, Iran will have no incentive to continue to largely adhere to the provisions of the deal and may well walk away, because it refuses to abide by a deal that increases its sense of vulnerability.

That said, given the changing circumstances, it has become impossible to enter into new negotiations unless a new atmosphere is created that would not be seen or interpreted as surrender which Iran will never allow to happen. President Rouhani's demand that the sanctions be lifted as a precondition toward renewed negotiations is a non-starter. Instead, entering new talks should be unconditional. A revised deal should be based on the original one and be structured to restore Iran's confidence and prevent any future aggression against it by any power from within or outside the region.

The involvement of a "trusted" third party is particularly important because the Iranians do not trust Trump not only because of his withdrawal from the deal, but because of his reversal of positions and public disdain toward Iran.

France, which assumed upon itself a mediating role between the US and Iran, is most suited to continue with its efforts to pave the way for direct US-Iran talks without asking Iran for any concessions that may make it appear as a weakness. France will also be in a position to help mitigate any roadblocks that are bound to arise throughout the negotiating process with the following prerequisites in place.

The condition for new negotiations:

1- Contrary to statements made by National Security Adviser John Bolton and Secretary of State Pompeo openly calling for regime change in Iran, Trump must make it clear that his administration does not seek regime change in Tehran. This is the most critical issue for the regime, and anything else is secondary. Indeed, Iran agreed to the deal not only because of the sanctions, but because the deal provided it with guaranteed security, which is the preservation of the regime.

2- Trump should reiterate his willingness to enter into direct and unconditional negotiations because given the current circumstances, direct talks remain the only viable option. By conducting face-to-face talks, some of the distrust which runs deep, can be mitigated between the US and Iran. Knowing that the new negotiations could not possibly ignore the original deal, Trump needs to publicly state that the US' intent is to have an "improved" agreement that reflects the interests of both sides.

3- Both sides must stop any and all acrimonious public statements against the other. To be sure, conducting negotiations under conditions of mutual verbal hostility and threats will only reinforce their suspicion over the other's real intent.

4- Since the primary conflict is between the US and Iran, no other signatory to the deal, besides France as a mediator, should participate in the new talks. Russia and China have their own axe to grind, and given their increasingly tense relations with the US, they may hinder rather than help the US' efforts to strike a new deal.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Alon Ben-Meir Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Dr. Alon Ben-Meir is a professor of international relations at the Center for Global Affairs at NYU. He teaches courses on international negotiation and Middle Eastern studies. His dedication to writing about, analyzing, and (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

"Army Of Islam" -- Erdogan's Plot Against Israel

Not Acting On Climate Crisis Is At Our Peril

Erdogan And The EU Are On A Collision Course In The Balkans

Kosovo And Erdogan's Dangerous Islamic Agenda

Time To Kick Turkey Out Of NATO

Is A War Between Israel And Iran/Hezbollah Imminent?

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   



You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.
Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 
Username
Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments  Post Comment


Eddy Schmid

Become a Fan
Author 512386

(Member since Nov 12, 2018), 2 fans, 279 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

What a load of rubbish. It seems the MSM and even Opednews is scraping the bottom of the barrel for stuff to fill it's pages. For example, I quote, " the Iran deal would substantially slow Iran's nuclear development program in a number of stages for 10-25 years. None of the signatories to the deal believed that Iran would necessarily abandon its ambition to acquire nuclear weapons." Unquote. Yep, lies and deceptions seems to be the norm these days. And by constantly repeating these lies, it would seem some folks hope they become FACT.

How anyone, after all these years, and investigations by the U.N. can still claim Iran wishes to persue nuclear weapons, is beyond me. The FACTS as repeated so many times now, by so many different people, are still VALID.

Iran has stated thousands of times, it will NEVER build nuclear weapons. Yet folks like the author of this article, seems to have wet dreams hoping the opposite will eventuate. There are more LIES or deception within this article, such as and I quote, " normalization of relations with the US and its allies, and being assured that the US has no design toward regime change" Unquote. Yeah, pigs will one day fly too. Normalisation of relations with the U.S. will NEVER HAPPEN, unless the Iranians surrender their autonomy to the U.S. and Israeli dictates. THAT is the ultimate aim, the nuclear crap is just a side story, always has been.

Then there's this, I quote, " Iran assumed an even harder line, refused to end its nefarious activities," Unquote. WOW, talk about the pot calling the kettle black. If any nation on this planet can be accused of conducting "nefarious activities" they are none other than the U.S. of A. and it's partner in crime, Israel.

Submitted on Tuesday, Sep 10, 2019 at 8:57:21 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment