Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 10 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (11 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Five Reasons Moderate Democrats Should Oppose Neil Gorsuch

By       Message Richard Eskow       (Page 1 of 3 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 77715
Become a Fan
  (14 fans)

From Our Future

From thehumanist.com: Live Well, Die Well: Neil Gorsuch {MID-70892}
Live Well, Die Well: Neil Gorsuch
(Image by thehumanist.com)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

After a contentious start to Neil Gorsuch's Supreme Court nomination hearings, Senate Democrats are struggling with what the New York Times calls "two options: Get out of the way or get run over."

But Democrats have a third option, one that should attract moderate "centrists" as well as more liberal senators: fight.

Sen. Michael Bennet, a Colorado Democrat, received some criticism for introducing Gorsuch to the Senate. Bennet's action was defensible: in normal times, it's Senate protocol for senators to introduce nominees from their home state. Colorado's other senator, Republican Cory Gardner, also introduced Gorsuch.

- Advertisement -

But these are not normal times, and Democrats need to recognize that. Donald Trump, and the Republican Party in general, have succeeded by ignoring "normal" behavior and the protocols of the past.

Nobody's suggesting that Democrats should behave like Republicans, but it's no longer "moderate" to pretend that the rules haven't changed. In today's world, a vote for Gorsuch is a vote for extremism over moderation.

Here are five reasons why all Democrats should vote against this nomination.

- Advertisement -

1. A vote for Gorsuch gives Trump a mandate

Trump adviser Roger Stone said it himself. "If Trump is going to be a transformational president, not a transitional president, he needs a supportive court."

But Trump does not have a mandate to transform the country the way the Supreme Court would with Gorsuch on the bench. Trump's Cabinet picks, along with his budget blueprint for 2018, have made it clear that he intends to govern from the far right. The blue-collar populism of the campaign has already faded.

As voters have come to know Trump the President, they have increasingly come to dislike him. Only 37 percent of voters approve of the way he's handling the job, according to the latest Gallup poll, while 58 percent of voters disapprove. As the Huffington Post notes, Barack Obama had a 60 percent approval rating at the same point in his presidency.

It may have been inelegant for the Huffington Post's headline to say that Trump's approval ratings are "in the toilet." Inelegant, but not inaccurate. A vote for Gorsuch is a vote to give Donald Trump the tools he needs to transform the nation in a way that very few people are going to like.

2. Gorsuch's judicial approach is not moderate

- Advertisement -

A number of attorneys who appear before the Supreme Court

- Advertisement -
signed a letter
last month calling Gorsuch "unfailingly polite." That's nice. But Gorsuch is no moderate, and some of his rulings have often been anything but kind.

There's a reason why Gorsuch was handpicked by two right-wing groups, the Federalist Society and the Heritage Foundation -- and it's not because he judges every case solely on its judicial merits. Sen. Patrick Leahy was right when he said today that Gorsuch had been "selected by interest groups." These groups chose Gorsuch because he shares their ideology, and because that ideology influences the way he decides cases.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Host of 'The Breakdown,' Writer, and Senior Fellow, Campaign for America's Future

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How to Fix the Fed: Dismiss Dimon, Boot the Bankers, and Can the Corporations

The Top 12 Political Fallacies of 2012

Pawn: The Real George Zimmerman Story

What America Would Look Like If Libertarians Got Their Way

"F" The Bureaucracy! The White House Can Help Homeowners Right Now

"His Own Man's" Man: Jeb Bush and the Return of Wolfowitz