Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 6 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 11/6/19

Fighting Fascism - Time for New Tactics

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   6 comments
Author 513220
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Michele Goddard

n244_w1150
n244_w1150
(Image by BioDivLibrary)
  Details   DMCA

As much as we might not want to admit it, and as reluctant as we are to engage in it, progressives need to acknowledge that we are in a war. We have been targeted. This is not a metaphor. We have been defined as the enemy by the right, and as their language and rhetoric ramps up, as they lurch towards physical acts of violence I wonder when progressives will realize that this is no longer an act of philosophic debate, no longer is it a difference of political opinion, we are looked upon as prey. And sadly, just like the liberals before us who found themselves on the receiving end of a fascist takeover, we are woefully behind the 8 ball. In spite of all of our lamenting about the rhetoric of the right, we don't ever seem to mobilize in any meaningful way to protect ourselves until it is too late. Right wing governments are rising the world over and time is up for us to stop wringing our hands and get a tactical plan together. I have a plan, I would like to share it with you.

The first thing must do is understand WHY liberals and progressives are always caught off guard when right wing rulers start rounding us up and throwing us in prisons or worse. To start with, our brains, our psychology suggests that we have certain fundamental differences in behavior and thought patterns. We can't "talk sense" to them or shame them out of their conduct. When we try our best and it has no effect, we sit and scratch our heads or call them ignorant and walk away.

Liberals, progressives and intellectuals by their nature are, generally speaking, less prone to violence for several reasons. Many acts of violence are often carried out in a moment of rage that overwhelms the perpetrator and obscures his or her logic and moral base. We are always told that if we feel angry to count to ten, to give ourselves a moment of calm so as not to react reflexively to this anger and to give our senses time to rebalance against our emotions. This occurs naturally in those with an analytical, philosophic nature because they are prone to investigate an issue, to see it from all sides, to test their own assumptions and biases against that of their "gut" reaction. Their moral convictions are based on a broad and lengthy library of mental transcripts, comparing each new situation to the ones in the past, looking for connections and anomalies. They insist on rationality. They rest secure in their positions because they are based on continuity, not the moment. So perhaps the mere process of all of this examination gives even the most passionate liberal time to channel his or her outrage into a better understanding of the situation. But as for action, they are slow. They burrow themselves into their positions as deeply as conservatives do, but the difference is, their conviction is self brought. Those on the left are a collective, but each one is on his own journey to discover the truth, and although objective truth is impossible for us to know in its purest sense, we come to a general agreement on many things because we use the same processes of evidence, logic and rationality to arrive at our beliefs.

The right is not so much this way. In fact, they are very much the opposite. The dynamic which drives the conservative is not an individualistic pursuit of truth, but an adherence to a set of ideals dictated to them by an authority. In this case, Donald Trump, but to be sure, the church, the military and police are organizations where a set of dictates drives action. Obedience is a prerequisite to all of these top down structures. You are to do as you are told. You are not to question. To question God, the Church, the President, the Police or a Soldier is all tantamount to heresy. It shouldn't surprise us that Donald Trump, following in the established pattern of car salesmen turned tv preacher/conman is highly effective at leading the Republicans down this path toward totalitarianism. They are ruled by emotion and love to revel in it without any annoying pauses for thoughtful reflection. Watching Donald Trump's rallies, the crowds amped up, dripping with their common iconography of flags and MAGA hats reminds me of the vast sea of devotees, the poor, giving their money to a fire and brimstone televangelist in need to a second private jet. The image of the Republicans "storming" the room where hearings were being "held in secret" reminded me of the mobs of Charlottesville - were it not for fire codes, I could easily envision Jim Jordan and Matt Gaetz leading the march with torches in hand.

For conservatives, their trust, their faith, their emotion, their devotion is measured by their willingness to forgo logic. To question is sinful and shows a weakness of faith. In fact there is a reaction of anger underlaid with fear, that occurs when they are presented with information which may cause them to change their minds. They fear cognitive dissonance because the very act of considering that they may not be right, that their trusted leader may have told them a lie, is to them, a slippery slope into disobedience. But it is also a personal fear that lives within the conservative. To them, their very survival is predicated on holding to these "eternal truths". If they dare to loosen their grip on the holy doctrines of Fox News and Trump's tweets, if they feel themselves tempted by the demonic forces of rationality they will disintegrate into a pile of dust.

So what does this mean? What it means is that it's time for liberals and progressives to understand what we are up against and to start changing our tactics before it is too late. Let me use an analogy to further my point.

We have all seen nature shows where the lion "king of the jungle" prowls stealthily in the grass, ever driven by his need to hunt, to kill and gorge himself of the blood of his prey while his intended meal munches peacefully in the grass among the herd. The lion is a meat eater and survival for him means to hunt and kill. He is not evil, but is driven by his need to eat to survive. It is merely a fact of evolution that his survival depends on his drive to kill prey. All of his senses are specifically designed around the hunt.

The prey, an antelope, per say, lives by grazing. Its food does not think or run or fight back. Therefore its survival is not based on the hunt. It is not more benevolent than the lion. Its is merely by evolutionary design, that the desire to hunt and kill is absent. The antelope has developed some defensive tactics against the lion. They are not completely helpless. But when the lion attacks, the antelope are REACTING to the lion's action. Being proactive is not something the antelope is really capable of. In some prey species having large scores of offspring is a result of many young succumbing to predators, but these are not really proactive, but are still a reaction to being devoured in large numbers.

The brains of liberals and conservatives are not that unlike these two camps. Conservatives are like the lion. They are driven by an internal belief that to survive they must always be engaged in the hunt. Even in times of peace they are always on the hunt for more. More prey. More resources. More power. Liberals, like the antelope, are live and let live. If left alone, we will munch our grass, choose our mates, birth our young, nurture the next generation to adulthood and then die, without ever feeling a desire to kill anything unless it threatens our young.

When the lions attack, there is among the herd a sense of intense panic. From the first of the herd to hear a rustling in the grass to the all out chaos of the stampede as the alarm is sounded, to the lion finally taking one of the antelope down. And as the lion finishes his prey, its last frantic bleating brought to an end in the powerful jaws, the herd, realizing the hunt is over, calms quite quickly and returns to normal. They go back to munching the grass until the next attack.

Liberals have to develop new tactics because the "prey" that conservatives are seeing is more than just a meal to survive. The hunt they are on is for ideological compliance. Their hunt is about "convert or die" When the balance of power is held in check by the trappings of democracy and the rule of law it is easy to look at the "extreme" cases that pop up here and there as outliers. We see the emergence of certain aspects of authoritarianism as sectional and unrelated but they aren't. While we have been munching grass, the conservatives have built an infrastructure, an ideological movement, a battleplan, right under our noses and as these plans begin to take shape as Donald Trump lurking in the tall grass, we have to sound the alarm, because the convergence of all these extreme elements leads to the destruction of democracy and the rule of law. And once authoritarianism is unleashed, it will be a feeding frenzy. We have already seen certain members of the herd singled out. The media and journalists. People of color and immigrants. Religious minorities and trans people. The lions are on the hunt.

As we watch children in cages, we hear the bleating cries of the injured in the mouth of the lion. We dart about our senses heightened, but we haven't formulated a plan. We have to stop doing this over and over. If Donald Trump's presidency doesn't lead to the abolishment of democracy and his installment as ruler for life, we have to consider this our last chance to evolve.

We have to realize going forward that we need to evolve and there is hard science which suggests that predator and prey evolve together and that the roles can be reversed given certain environmental factors. Conservatives will often tout the concept of "survival of the fittest" and praise the archetype of the hunter, a strong belief in dominance and destruction of the weak. Hitler was a big fan. But so were many common people swept up in the racism of eugenics. They laud these theories because they see themselves as apex predators and they want to keep what they feel is the "king of the jungle" position. This underlying belief is expressed through racism, patriarchy, misogyny and narcissism that shows its ugly head in blatant ways at times. Donald Trump's father explained it to him in terms of "killers" and "losers" and told him you had to be one or the other. Killers know how to be aggressive and take what they want. If you want a beautiful woman, just grab her by the p*ssy, and brag about it. These things are not detractors to those on the right, but are signals of pride. A badge of honor that they are predators not prey.

But scientists who study the evolutionary dynamics of predator prey relationships have shown that roles can change and even reverse. Without getting too deep into the mechanics of how this happens (you can read more here https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/111/20/7486.full.pdf )

I will say that the political parties, across the globe, are experiencing a shift. The tactics used by the conservative and right wing governments, racial hatred, xenophobia, oppression of women, propaganda, religious fundamentalism and nationalism have been in decline over the last 200 years, with violent spasms occurring periodically. The conservatives wail about the expansion of liberty and progressive ideas as a threat that must be dealt with . Overall however, the herd has been signaling when one of these traits exposes itself and we call it out as dangerous. The revival of right wing ideology we are witnessing is a sign that the prey is getting more connected, more responsive and it frightens them. Donald Trump is the backlash of progress.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Michele Goddard Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

I was born in 1970 in Wheeling, WV and have lived here all my life. I come from mostly Irish Catholic coal miners and railroad workers. My original academic interest was in teaching foreign languages studying both French and Spanish in High (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

9/11 Truth is Going Mainstream. Now what?

War is Hell - For Some

True Populism VS Trumpulism

Hierarchy and Fascism - How the Ruling Few are Destroying Democracy

An Unwilling Prophet

Fighting Fascism - Time for New Tactics

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   


You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 

Username
Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

4 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments  Post Comment


Michele Goddard

Become a Fan
Author 513220
(Member since Mar 28, 2019), 4 fans, 19 articles, 131 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

I hope that others will see this and it will motivate and inspire them to form tighter bonds withing the progressive movement, to become more organized and to start building a lasting infrastructure to defeat the existence of right wing extremism once and for all.

Submitted on Wednesday, Nov 6, 2019 at 3:59:26 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help

John Jonik

Become a Fan
Author 10030
(Member since Jan 16, 2008), 15 fans, 38 articles, 2330 comments, 6 diaries
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

(Image by Unknown Owner) Details DMCA

Submitted on Thursday, Nov 7, 2019 at 12:31:09 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (4+)
Help

Derryl Hermanutz

Become a Fan
Author 64335
(Member since Apr 27, 2011), 50 fans, 24 articles, 1 quicklinks, 1527 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

In another OpEd article published today, a woman describes how her husband's career and their family's life were destroyed by his university, after he exposed the fraudulent reporting of lab results by a colleague. The fraudster was promoted; the whistleblower was ruined and hounded out of the profession.

Science has become scientism: faith in the all-knowing authority of anybody who claims to be a "scientist". Within institutions, groupthink and tribalism triumph over truth. The medical profession has long since been ruled by the pharmaceutical industry. Western medicine does not study food, diet and lifestyle to promote health; it studies what drugs to prescribe to treat people who are made sick by industrially-produced food and consumer lifestyles; and by social-psychological problems induced by the economic-government system of predatory financial capitalism.

Meanwhile, progressives and liberals have fallen into their own groupthink and tribalism. Democracy - a political system in which an elected government makes laws and policies based on the will of the majority of the population - has been replaced with "liberal democracy". Liberal democracy does not accept the moral beliefs and values of the majority, if those morals are not "liberal". Liberal democracy is a tyranny of a minority of self-appointed moral overseers who "know" what is good and right and true; and who are happy to use the institutional power of the state to impose their moral beliefs and values on an unwilling majority. Yet, the moral tyrants are convinced of the goodness and rightness of their beliefs, and continue to claim they are "democrats" rather than admitting they are imposing minority rule. Liberal democracy is rule by the moral certainties of "liberals".

Many liberals and progressives continue to believe in the goodness of institutions, against all evidence that those institutions are wholly corrupted. So they believe in global warming, and the virtue of vaccines, and other proclamations of truth emanating from the sanctified halls of fraudulent scientism. Liberals and progressives are all too ready to impose draconian controls over people's lives, to "save the planet', and "prevent disease".

Despite the email evidence that Hillary and the DNC stole the nomination from Bernie, liberals and progressives have spent the past 3 years screeching "Putin hacked the election!" because they cannot accept that Trump beat Lying Hillary, Regime Changer of Honduras, Butcher of Libya, in a democratic election. Liberals and progressives are not without their own set of psychological blinders that make them believe what they want to believe and deny all evidence that contradicts their moral certainties.

It's also true that many conservatives believe in the lying horseshit of "free markets"; and believe government is the problem and free markets are the solution. Meanwhile, private commercial banks create all the money as "loans", and giant corporations have long since bought up the free market and now exercise monopoly power along with their bought and paid for governments. Conservatives believe "the government prints the money", and blame the government - that is $23 trillion in "debt" - for printing and spending too much money. Real life continues to get worse for most conservatives, who are saddled with unpayable debts and losing their jobs to the "free market" activities of the corporations who own the economy. But they maintain belief in their beliefs and their own moral and economic certainties.

Despite all evidence that the US 2 party system is hopelessly rigged against producing any outcome that serves the interests of the masses over the interests of the ruling plutocracy, people continue to waste their political efforts attacking each other for being "Democrats" or "Republicans". Some people write articles confirming that "our guys" are virtuous prey while "their guys" are evil predators. Hillary was and is a fullblown member of the evil predator class. Obama promised Hope and Change and delivered more evil predation, though he was well-spoken while doing it; and now he is rich because it pays to serve the interests of the ruling aristocracy of bankers and corporatists. Liberals are now even embracing Dubya - who blew up Iraq and mass murdered its people - because Dubya is no longer President, and because he is not Trump.

The enemy is not each other. The enemy is the capitalist system of rule by ownership, which is feudalism for the industrial era. Attack feudalism, and ignore the sliver in your political opponent's eye or else he may point out the log in your own eye.

Submitted on Friday, Nov 8, 2019 at 12:24:53 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
Indent

Michele Goddard

Become a Fan
Author 513220
(Member since Mar 28, 2019), 4 fans, 19 articles, 131 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Derryl Hermanutz:   New Content

David,


Thank you for such a detailed and thorough response to my article. I appreciate the feedback and I hope you will read my response. I agree with you on more than you wold probably guess as I read your response to imply a partisan base to my article. Let me assure you that I detest neoliberalism and Hillary Clinton and find her as corrupt and evil as I do Donald Trump. I agree with you wholeheartedly that group think exists on both sides and that we should always examine the empirical evidence of each issue for ourselves as you point out that institutions can be influenced, bought or otherwise corrupted by the capitalist system. I urge people to try and read between the lines of what they are being told and to ALWAYS as themselves "Whats in it for the person trying to convince me of their truth?" Pay more attention to their motivation rather merely what they are saying. People like Hillary, Obama and Biden just put a kindler and gentler face on empire building than W did. They are all clearly answering to the corporate oligarchy.


The point of my article, though focused on the rhetoric of Republicans can be true for either side. However I do feel that their are differences in the way conservatives, liberals and progressives receive and process information, both as individuals and as a group. Intelligent, well educated liberals have also realized these thought triggers and reflex reactions will work for their pet issues but they are also dependent on spreading disinformation and discouraging independent thought. I have a hypothesis that neurologically there are structures in the brain which make us more or less likely to follow the hierarchical "do as your're told" model or to be a person who constantly questions at deeper and deeper levels what we are being told. Of course people can vary on the spectrum. I can acknowledge that I have biases, and in acknowledging that I try to back up from an issue and see it fro many angles and to always question WHO is telling me this and HOW they benefit from my believing what they are trying to tell me. Sometimes people are so convinced of their dogma and push it very passionately because they have invested so much time in reinforcing their own biases.


The subject of propaganda is a vast and complex subject and I hope that everyone takes note of it in any and all forms, used by the left and right. This article is a narrow consideration of the immediate threat posed by the current tactics being employed by the right wing in our country at this moment. This well established historical pattern employed by right wing, nationalistic regimes in the past that play specifically to xenophobic tendencies in human beings to create an us and them is alarming. Anyone on the left employing such tactic is equally guilty, but given their platform of inclusiveness and multiculturalism etc it is hard to use this tactic, but never the less that does not leave them blameless in their own capitulation to corporate interests, etc.


The reason I chose the metaphor of the lion and antelope is because the lion, as I mentioned, is doing what is in his nature as is the antelope and I specifically said that neither should be viewed as evil or benevolent in regards to acting on their natures. However, we are not lions and antelope and we have a far greater responsibility to recognize these inner drives as human beings, and to make the conscious effort to make good choices for our species as a whole.


Again thank you for your thoughtful response and for the continued discussion.


Take Care,


Michele



Submitted on Friday, Nov 8, 2019 at 1:05:36 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help

Paul Krumm

Become a Fan
Author 91672
(Member since Jan 12, 2014), 6 fans, 10 articles, 3 quicklinks, 86 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

I find this article to be a classic on the subject of the qualities of authority centered vs data centered points of view. Thank you. I will remember the animal metaphor which was very helpful, with the caveat that humans, with our use of written language and technology, have a special position because of our ascending power over the ecological stability of the earth. We are required to be conscious of our morality. The scholarly article recommended also gave credence to the presentation.

I have found it productive to see the leadership of both of our major political parties as just two of the competing mafias (all overseen by the banking/finance mafia) that really run our country and the world.

I would add to the list of those needing support, whistle blowers who have already had their lives forever changed for the worse (or will) because of their actions. They are the front line, and need the active support of those of us who attempt to be data centered. They are our major data source. The 'liberal media' can't be expected to support these people. That is a job for us.

I did stumble over a few misspelled words, that I had to figure out what really meant.

Submitted on Saturday, Nov 9, 2019 at 12:29:48 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
Indent

Michele Goddard

Become a Fan
Author 513220
(Member since Mar 28, 2019), 4 fans, 19 articles, 131 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Paul Krumm:   New Content

Paul,


Thank you so much for your comments. I always appreciate feedback and hearing the observations of others. Thank you as well for the critique on the spelling. I try to proofread but sometimes I am blind to my own errors. If I can still edit the article I will fix them for other readers. I'm glad you found the analogy helpful.


Take care,


Michele

Submitted on Saturday, Nov 9, 2019 at 1:27:41 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment