On the day after Scott Olsen was awarded $4.5 million for injuries incurred during an Occupy Oakland protest, the folks who believe that the police are out of control held a book fair in Oakland.
A group called Copwatch was in existence before the first Occupy Oakland protester brought a tent to Frank Ogawa plaza. The Occupy movement produced many examples of conduct that Copwatch wants to eliminate. The protesters allege that the wealthy are being given priority treatment in a society that preaches all men are created equal.
Access to public restrooms was severely restricted during the Occupy time period. The police then alleged that the protesters were uncivilized creations who didn't use bathrooms and soiled themselves.
People (including the corporations known as "people") who don't pay taxes couldn't care less how much Scott Olsen received as a settlement because it is the average citizen who will foot the bill for the cash awarded to the injured protester. The fact that the richest pay no taxes and this law suit settlement will be paid for with funds provided by the middle class and poor taxpayers and not the rich seems to be an example of achieving perpetual motion.
When the Scott Olsen incident happened news reports indicate he had been hit by a teargas canister but when the cash award settlement was made, it was described as injuries received when he was hit with a beanbag. Doesn't that sound like a much more benevolent way to be injured for life? Getting hit by a canister sounds barbaric but getting knocked out by a beanbag sounds like some high spirited schoolboy rowdiness got a bit out of hand.
We wondered if there would be a large amount of coverage of the Anarchists' Book Fair, on the day after the settlement was announced on Friday, March 21, 2014 or if we would pretty much have the Saturday story for our own. Berkeley journalist/blogger Ken Knabb had a table at the event, and we were interviewed by a reporter for KALW radio but we did not see any evidence that would support a contention that the even received much additional coverage.
We thought the event would provide us with a blank check for some clever word play such as "we had a blast covering it" and "we'll take a shot at describing it."
Most folks think that anarchy is a synonym for bedlam and pandemonium but the anarchists say that it is a bit more of a less government form of political philosophy. Take a closer look and it sounds like a mirror image of the Republican teabagers' agenda.
The rich f*ckers who think that the solution of the homeless problem is to tell them: "Go home!" see no irony in the fact that many of them are in that condition because banks foreclosed them out of their domicile. It's kinda like telling an alcoholic to have a drink, eh?
Dump then out of their homes, put them in the streets and then tell them "go home!" Who says they don't have sense of humor that produces kneeslaper jokes?
Are the capitalists who want people to work for minimum wage, buy their goods at the company store, and pay big tax bills the root cause of society's unrest or is it the anti-social(ist) rabble who cause the winter of our discontent?
Bob Calhoun was there promoting his book "Shattering Conventions," which is a journal of his exploration of the world of expos and conventions. Wouldn't that make an intriguing shtick for use as a weekly feature by a outlet in the mainstream media? What's not to love about the idea of a fellow covering a new gathering every week? (Isn't that just the kind of thing USA Today would publish?)
Endless Canvas is a website that features news and photos of interest to graffiti artists and their fans in the San Francisco area known as "the East Bay." Two of the local celebrities in that realm are Gatz and Broke. We bought a copy of "More Beer Less Work #4" done by Broke and it seems to be numbered and signed.
We could probably churn out a column about the 100 best anarchy songs of all time, and maybe sometime in the future we will.
As it turned out we were working on a column about anarchy at the same time that the fellow who runs the Cinesthesia dot blogspot website asked for our opinion of the "Grand Hotel Budapest" movie. It seemed to us (subjective opinion alert!) to be like "The Sound of Music" without the tunes and politics so we told him: "It is the greatest film tribute to fascism since "Triumph of the Will!'" If a fellow expects a flick to be a big disappointment and it is; does that mean it wasn't?
Is the fact that an elite bunch of hackers can keep track of every phone call in a foreign country for an entire month but they can't find a missing airliner an indication that Americans are more gullible than previously assumed?