Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 21 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

FDA to Put Horror Comic Graphics on Cig Packs

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   No comments
Author 10030
Message John Jonik

The media haven't gotten around to telling us that one may submit Public Comments, until Jan. 11, 2011, about the FDA's plan to require disgusting graphics on packages of one specific consumer product---cigarettes.    Many other products have escaped this treatment.   And, the most deadly parts of typical cigarettes have evaded FDA attention.    It's interesting to note what the FDA ignores regarding the foods and drugs  they ostensibly regulate.

 The FDA has no plans to require label pictures of the following:

 Victims of e-coli or salmonella-tainted food from under-regulated food producers.

Wildlife poisoned by the tons of pesticides dumped onto food crops, cotton, and tobacco.

People burned to death in fires caused by the still legal use of added burn accelerants in typical cigarettes.

Slaughtered pigs, cattle, sheep, chickens, turkeys, etc.

Faces of people killed by barely-tested or mis-prescribed and over-used pharmaceutical products---some from Pharms that also supply tobacco pesticides and non-tobacco cigarette additives.

Smiling pharmaceutical CEOs getting paid for, and avoiding responsibilities for, supplying pesticides and untested non-tobacco cigarette additives to the Cig industry.

 Various media have already pointed out the hypocrisy of this plan---with cartoons about labels on high-sugar and high-fat products, and pics of mangled people on cars, etc.   But this isn't much of a joke.  

     Mainstream media, and even alternative media, have ignored other details of the FDA's "regulation" of smoking products.    Who is informed that the FDA is forbidden by Congress from doing anything about the Agricultural Parts of the cigarette industry?   

 That is, they will ignore the hundreds of tobacco pesticides, no matter how many deadly residues end up in typical cigarettes and in unwitting people's lungs.   As a consequence of that, the FDA will astonishingly tolerate dioxins in cigarette smoke that come from the still-legal chlorine pesticides.  

If that isn't bad enough, the FDA must also ignore the cancer-causing levels of radiation in typical cigarettes from the still-legal use of certain phosphate fertilizers.   That agricultural stuff is to be left to the Department of Agriculture and the EPA which have allowed toxic and carcinogenic crop contaminants for decades. There will be no Rad Symbols required on radiation-contaminated cigarettes.

    It's not clear in the law, but the FDA may also have to ignore more cancer-causing dioxins from the chlorine-bleached cigarette paper--- paper being from wood pulp; perhaps considered "agricultural".   

    The FDA is required to ignore the most deadly parts of typical cigarettes.   The FDA addresses farm practices elsewhere, but not here.     It's "the tobacco exemption".    Mustn't inconvenience the pesticide-chlorine industries, and their insurers and investors, you see.   Better to inconvenience unwitting, unprotected, secretly poisoned, uncompensated, Guinea-pigged smokers, they being "dirty", "sinful" and "non-compliant" and all.

  It is highly unlikely that the sick and dead smokers that are to be depicted on cigarette labels got sick or dead from the use of tobacco.     It is extremely likely, however, that they are victims of so-called "tobacco" that has been contaminated with a wider variety of toxic and carcinogenic non-tobacco substances than can be found in an average hazardous waste dump.

     And it's likely that many victims received more, or even most, of their body burdens of toxic and carcinogenic industrial substances elsewhere---on the job, from contaminated soils, near industrial sites, etc.     But, if they happened to smoke or live with smokers, they unwittingly become convenient scapegoats to take the heat off of the responsible industries.  

Next Page  1  |  2


Rate It | View Ratings

John Jonik Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Long time activist in areas relating to industrial toxics, media content and control, death penalty, Mumia Abu-Jamal, hemp prohibition, civil rights, insurance influence in public governing, religious influence in public governing, unsafe foods, (more...)
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Health Care Cartoons

"Fire Safe" Means Not Fire Safe

Health Care Cartoons II

How The Left Serves the Corporatocracy

Pesticide Industry War On Mothers

FDA To Promote Increased Smoking