Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 1 Share on Twitter 3 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 7/26/12

Eroding U.S. Federal Oversight of Genetically Engineered Crops

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   1 comment
Author 80015
Message sustainable prosperity

Genetically engineered (GE) foods have been heralded as the solution to food shortages in the future, as biotech companies modify the DNA of crops in an effort to make them more robust. Certain GE crops can now withstand freezing temperatures or are resilient to heavy applications of pesticides and herbicides.

GE crops are widespread in the United States. Nationwide, 93 percent of the soybean crop is genetically modified to resist the large volumes of herbicides used to combat weeds that compete with the soybeans. Although these DNA modifications aim to improve a crop's vitality on one hand, genetic engineering also can have many unintended consequences for both the environment and human health.

Genetically Modified Food on the Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Canada (Photo via Flickr, by Peter Blanchard)

A former employee of Monsanto, which is a leading producer of both herbicides and biotech seeds , stated  that genetically engineering crops and foods changes the DNA of the plant or organism, but alters the cell "in such a way that it's unknown what the effects are going to be" in the long and short term.

With such uncertainty, and the prevalence of GE crops, it is critical that the full effects of genetically engineered foods be investigated. Studies have found that mice that were fed GE corn showed an increase in their overall body weight of more than 3.7 percent, and an increase in their liver size of up to 11 percent. In addition to triggering weight gain and metabolic consequences, GE crops have been shown to affect the organ function of test subjects, causing liver and kidney disruption. Although studies like these are pulling back the veil on GE crops, further testing is needed to understand the broader consequences of genetic engineering on our food, bodies, and environment.

Yet the U.S. government appears to be moving in the opposite direction, reducing transparency and accountability by adopting new laws that heavily favor the biotech industry. On July 12, the House of Representatives' agriculture committee passed its own version of the proposed Farm Bill, rolling back the Senate's more progressive proposal, which would have defended sustainable agriculture and emboldened the "Know your Farmer, Know your Food" initiative promoted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) under President Obama.

The House's decision, if adopted into law, will lead to greatly reduced regulation of GE crops in the future. Among other measures, the decision so weakens the USDA's oversight of genetic engineering that biotech companies would no longer be required to submit proposed GE crops for environmental review or be exposed to litigation from organic farmers whose crops may have been contaminated by genetic drift.

Interesting perspective of a cherry through a fish-eye lens (Photo via Flickr, by Kalexanderson)

Furthermore, the House's regressive legislation would undermine the National Environmental Policy Act and the U.S. Endangered Species Act, as the decision exempts genetically modified organisms from meeting the requirements of these policies. It would enable GE organisms to be cultivated and used, even if they may harm an endangered species.

In order for the Farm Bill and its proposed changes to GE crop oversight to take effect, the full House of Representatives must vote to pass the Bill. The Bill must then be reconciled with the Senate's version. However, it appears unlikely that House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) will put the Farm Bill up for a vote before the August recess. This may postpone decisions about the Bill until the next Congress arrives, after the November elections.

But even as national policy governing GE crops threatens to regress, states such as Vermont and California have been working to implement legislation that will require the disclosure of information about GE crops to the public.

California's draft ballot initiative, Label GMO, aims to bolster the state's Proposition 65 initiative passed in 1986. Label GMO is distinct from Prop 65 in several key ways. Namely, it targets disclosure around GE foods sold at retail establishments, exempting medical foods and food sold for immediate consumption, and it also establishes threshold standards for GE foods. The threshold standards ensure that businesses can operate in compliance with the law and knowingly produce GE or non-GE foods, thereby reducing their exposure to abusive private litigation.

anti-genetically modified foods poster (Photo via Flickr, by live w mcs)

In the absence of strong federal action on genetic engineering, ballot initiatives such as Label GMO are critical steps that regional and local governments can take to improve government oversight of GE crops, thus protecting consumers and the environment. State governments and citizens must continue pushing for increased oversight through proactive legislation to defend consumer rights, improve access to GE crop information, and pressure the federal government to pass progressive policies at the national level.

 

(First published on Worldwatch Institute's blog: http://blogs.worldwatch.org/sustainableprosperity/ and Written by Antonia Sohns). 

 

 

Must Read 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

sustainable prosperity Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

State of the World 2012: Moving Toward Sustainable Prosperity showcases innovative projects, creative policies, and fresh approaches that are advancing sustainable development in the twenty-first century. In articles from experts around the world, (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Desperately Seeking: A Sustainable, Climate-Friendly Food System

Every Building Should Be Sustainable, Not Just Green

Leading by Example: The Dutch Prepare for Climate Change

Green Jobs on the Rise

Sustainable Transportation gains momentum at Rio+20

Mobile technology's role in a sustainable future