Power of Story Send a Tweet        

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 2 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn 1 Share on PInterest 1 Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 2 Tell A Friend (7 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment
OpEdNews Op Eds

Ending US occupation of South Korea: What Does 'Denuclearization' Mean in the Negotiations for an End to the Korean War?

By       Message Dave Lindorff       (Page 1 of 3 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 4/29/18

Author 63
Become a Fan
  (82 fans)
- Advertisement -

From flickr.com: Exercise Cobra Gold 2014 [Image 9 of 14] {MID-287559}
For North Korea, US troops stationed in the South are nuclear.
(Image by DVIDSHUB)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

Media news reports and commentary as well as political statements coming out of Washington on the surprising blossoming of peace talks between North and South Korea tend to focus on the question of whether North Korean leader Kim Jong-un is really"serious" about eliminating his recently developed nuclear weapons arsenal, or whether he will just try to keep what he has while decrying US military threats to his regime.

- Advertisement -

Missing in all the verbiage has been any reporting on the long US history of nuclear weapons in South Korea, where the US still, 65 years after the end of fighting on the peninsula, maintains at least three military bases and 28,000 combat-ready troops.

That history, which includes the US keeping as many as 950 nuclear bombs and a variety of delivery systems -- rockets, planes and even howitzers that fire nuclear shells -- within miles of the North Korean border.

- Advertisement -

An excellent 2017 report by the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists , based upon publicly available Defense Department documents, gives detailed history of the basing of nuclear weapons -- strategic and tactical -- in South Korea during at least 33 years of the 65 years that the US and North Korea have been officially in a state of war. That report makes it clear that North Korea continues to have a bull's eye on it for US Trident submarines patrolling the north Pacific, and for nuclear-capable aircraft based on Guam, Okinawa and possibly or potentially in Japan, where the US has a major naval base.

The report states that US nuclear weaponswere finally fully removed from South Korea in 1991, on orders from then President George H. W. Bush, but discussions to return them took place on several occasions when tensions rose on the peninsula, including as recently as 2011 during the Obama administration.

In US reporting on the peace negotiations between North and South Korea, and in speculation about whether Kim Jong-un is"serious" about "giving up" his country's nukes, there is typically a mention that while "denuclearization" for the US means Kim giving up his nukes, the term for Kim and North Korea might mean a demand that the US pull its troops from South Korea and shut its bases there. As the New York Times put it in an article on Sunday:

- Advertisement -

Nor has it clarified how it defines a 'nuclear-free Korean Peninsula,' and especially whether that means a withdrawal or significant reconfiguration of American troops based in South Korea, as it has demanded before.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Dave Lindorff is a founding member of the collectively-owned, journalist-run online newspaper www.thiscantbehappening.net. He is a columnist for Counterpunch, is author of several recent books ("This Can't Be Happening! Resisting the (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Israel's Gaza Atrocities Recall America's Atrocities in Vietnam

Supreme Court Junket King Scalia Dies While Vacationing with Wealthy Patrons at Private West Texas Getaway

Something's happening here: Clinton's Crumbling, Bernie's Surging and a 'Political Revolution' May Be in the Offing

Looming climate catastrophe?: A Rapidly Warming Arctic Could Loose a Methane Climate Bomb Causing Extinction in 9 Years

The Case for Impeachment of President Barack Obama

Barack Obama: Manchurian Candidate Version 2.0

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments


Daniel Geery

Become a Fan
Author 1198

(Member since Jul 9, 2009), 70 fans, 166 articles, 3281 quicklinks, 14182 comments, 180 diaries


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

Solid argument for the Koreans to proceed on their own, as basic common sense dictates. And for the U.S. to withdraw from the world at large and fix its own infinite problems.

Submitted on Monday, Apr 30, 2018 at 3:31:32 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment