Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (5 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment
OpEdNews Op Eds

Eliminating AmeriCorps Would Produce More Costs Than Savings

By       Message Sam Williford     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Interesting 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 2/12/11

- Advertisement -

As part of a program to reduce $35 billion in federal government spending, Republicans are planning to eliminate the Corporation for National and Community Service, which provides the funding for AmeriCorps programs.

The Civilian Conservation Corps of the 1930's was a keystone of the New Deal, and helped provide economic and educational opportunity for millions of Americans. Doing the same when education is more paramount than ever, and unemployment remains high is a logical choice.

- Advertisement -

AmeriCorps programs have existed since the 1960's, following Sargent Shriver's idea for a domestic Peace Corps. The Corporation for National and Community Service was created in 1993, in order to reward individuals for their participation in the program with a minor grant for college or to pay student loans (the value of which is pegged to the Pell Grant).

To cut federal support for AmeriCorps would be a devastating blow to America's very core. AmeriCorps members commit themselves to improving communities across America for very little pay. In exchange, these volunteers develop professional skills, learn about challenges facing fellow Americans, and make a measurable difference in thousands of ways.

With local services already under tremendous strain due to state budget cuts, to deprive communities of the work done by members of the program at a far lower cost to taxpayers than other government services or private sector programs would be disastrous.

In 2009, the program received slightly less than $1 billion, and helped more than 75,000 individuals obtain higher education. While the military spends considerably more to obtain a similar goal for recruits, many Americans prefer peaceful domestic service to that alternative.

- Advertisement -

It's obvious that methods such as ending our foreign wars, reforming our outdated and ineffective tax system (including implementing a value-added tax) and rethinking our failed policies on trade would be much more effective in reducing our budget deficits and getting the economy back on track.

- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Interesting 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

http://www.economyincrisis.org
Sam Williford graduated from the College of Charleston (Charleston, SC) with a degree in Communications. Past politcal work includes Democracy Matters, a campaign finance reform group, and serving as a Page in the South Carolina State Senate for (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Eliminating AmeriCorps Would Produce More Costs Than Savings