Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 1 Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

Economy to Invest and Spend

By       Message Kamu Budhathoki Sarup       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   1 comment

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Author 5249
Become a Fan
  (7 fans)
- Advertisement -

(The question then becomes whether we are more productive or save and invest more to obtain increases in productivity. )

Kamala B Sarup

"True, economy of one nation used to buy and sell economy of another nation in the foreign-exchange market produces neither producer goods and services nor consumer goods and services, but that is a small amount of the tota l money in circulation. Small as it is relative to other economic activity, this speculation is useful in that it keeps the relative values of different moneys accurate in terms of relative purchasing power; that is, governments cannot simply print money willy-nilly and expect it to buy proportionately more goods and services. Increases and decreases in the economy supply must match increases and decreases in the value of goods and services, approximately; otherwise, the relative value of money changes. 'The speculators will see to that', said Stanly recently."

We also should assume that all economy supply is circulated and used to produce something of value to someone. The rich buy more expensive things and invest more than the poor. The poor buy less expensive things and invest less. In fact, there are lots of goods and services from which the rich and poor can satisfy themselves. There are lots of different investments from which the rich and poor can choose. The progressive economy does not sit idle. It always circulates to produce valuable goods and services.

How to develop the economy? Except for the small inventory of economy we must keep it to invest and spend.

- Advertisement -
Economy doesn't sit around doing nothing or just pass around from one rich person to another, again doing nothing productive. Most of it is used to create additional money. In this way the GDP usually continues to increase.

"We should invest more money to companies that use it to buy plant and equipment to create additional value. In that process, executives, managers and laborers receive good economy to spend and invest. In return, we receive interest or dividends on our account that we use to buy goods and services and reinvest. The economy doesn't just circulate pointlessly.

"The only bad economy that is useless is that which is hoarded. That happens on a large scale when people and businesses lose confidence that their money will bring a satisfactory return, i.e., more money, so they stop buying and investing. They just hold it. That can cause a recession or depression", he further added.

- Advertisement -
The reason not to have depressions any more is that the government can put money in circulation and make some investments itself and hope that people will gain confidence, use it to spend and invest to keep the economy running. No guarantee that will happen, of course, so depressions are always possible.

Another possible problem is created by the imbalance of consumption and investment, but that is another story. The relationship between tax amounts, tax rates and productivity and "prosperity" is not obvious from a priori reasoning. Increases in per-capita GDP depend on increases in productivity.

"If we either do not work harder and smarter, or spend all our earnings on consumption, i.e., save and invest nothing, either on machinery, infrastructure, or social services, then productivity and per-capita GDP will not increase. The question then becomes whether we are more productive or save and invest more to obtain increases in productivity. The answer is determined by trial and error, i.e., experience, and not by theory", Stanly further added.

Some claim, without proof, that all economic activity, including defense and justice, would be more productive if performed by non-government workers. Communists claim that all economic activity would be more productive if performed by government workers. Libertarians and socialists, without proof, make claims somewhere between these polar types.

In the U.S., since its founding, trial and error has resulted in the present mix of government and nongovernment economic activities. 

Kamala B Sarup earned a bachelor's degree in economics.

- Advertisement -


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Journalist, poet and editor Kamu Budhathoki Sarup specializes in reporting news and writing stories covering Freedom, Peace, Public health, Democracy, Women/Children, development, justice and advocacy from her location inside the United States. (more...)

Kamu Budhathoki Sarup Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Education Is Important In A Democracy

Women and Literacy

The rain is as beautiful

Democracy vs Communism: Lessons from History

Early marriage Causes Harm To Women