Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Poll Analyses
Share on Facebook 10 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
General News    H3'ed 1/28/20

Economic Effects of Home Ownership

By Richard Colman  Posted by Mari Eliza (about the submitter)       (Page 1 of 2 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   2 comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Mari Eliza
single famly homes in San Francisco
single famly homes in San Francisco
(Image by Photo by Zrants)
  Details   DMCA

Single family homes in California are under attack by State Senator Scott Wiener and his supporters who claim that single family homes remove affordable housing for people of color and poor people because they cannot live in single family homes. Moms 4 Housing just proved him wrong. Photo by zrants

By Richard Colman, in response to the material that appeared in The Economist on Jan. 18, 2020, titled "Home ownership is the West's biggest economic-policy mistake"

In addition, The Economist (same issue) also provided a very long article on housing.

Basically, The Economist argued that America's gross domestic product (the total output of good and services) would be higher if housing were not given such favorable treatment by government.

The Economist gave examples of housing policies in Germany, Singapore, and Switzerland. The magazine wrote favorably of the housing policies in these nations.

The Economist argued that an individual could earn more income by investing in stocks than in home ownership.

In America, the problem is this: A renter is subject to the whims of a landlord.

We have seen too many Americans lose their places to live because of landlords and other eviction-related factors.

Personally, I know of too many Americans who became homeless or almost homeless because they were renters, not owners.

The property tax in America is really a wealth tax. Normally, there is no tax on an asset unless and until the asset is sold. However, in America, the property tax is levied on residential property (and commercial property) while the property is still in the owner's possession.

Presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts) has called for a wealth on high-income people. Sen. Warren has not acknowledged that existing American property taxes are a wealth tax.

Sen. Warren has proposed a two percent tax on household net worth between $50 million and $1 billion. She has also proposed a four percent tax (a six percent tax overall) on households net worth above $1 billion.

Here is a key question: If Sen. Warren's plans become law, how much time will elapse before her wealth tax is applied to lower levels of income?

In 1913, the United States adopted the personal income tax. Initially, the rates were very low. Now, more than 100 years later, the income-tax rates are much higher.

Perhaps the time has come to eliminate the property tax and replace it with some other form of taxation (or no taxation at all).

If you want my personal opinion, I feel better about Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minnesota) and former Vice President Joe Biden (D-Delaware) than I do about Sen. Warren.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Mari Eliza Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Artist, writer, working to promote a clean healthy planet, society and economy.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact EditorContact Editor
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Privatization of San Francisco's public streets, one corporation at a time

Court Order the Fed to Hand Over Details of the Bank Bailouts

Bail out local health clinics

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments


Mari Eliza

Become a Fan (Member since Jun 2, 2009), 3 fans, 3 articles, 137 quicklinks, 367 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Author Richard Colman comments on some of the more radical claims published in the Economist that claim single family housing is bad for the economy. California State Senator Scott Wiener is pushing SB50 to remove local pubic control over development in local communities. Nonpartisan citizen groups are uniting to fight for local control.

Submitted on Tuesday, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:22:29 AM

  Recommend  (0+)
Help
Indent

David Wieland

Become a Fan
Author 512811
(Member since Jan 1, 2019), 1 fan, 249 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Mari Eliza:   New Content

It's astonishing how dogmatic publications that used to be more balanced have become, proposing ever more restrictions as "solutions".

Submitted on Tuesday, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:07:01 PM

  Recommend  (0+)
Help