Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 9 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

E'tedal: the Iranian People's Call for Moderation

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   1 comment
Message Taiyeb Taheri

  From 16 Azar Posters(10)
16 Azar Posters(10) by sabzphoto


In the months leading up to the Iranian elections, the reformist voices were rather meek and discomposed, and anybody willing to utter the words "Green' or "Mousavi' could be guaranteed a swift boot in the solar plexus, courtesy of the Basij paramilitary forces.

Many reformists were calling for a complete boycott of the elections, and it was therefore left to the established political classes to battle things out. Political groups such as Abadgaran, which in the past had championed the anti-imperialist punk rocker of Iranian politics, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, were split this time round. Many opted for Saeed Jalili, who was backed by ultra-hardliners spearheaded by the trigger-happy Fatwa maniac, Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi. Others preferred the charismatic Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, who had gentrified the streets of Tehran during his tenure as mayor of the capital.

Ghalibaf was seen by many as the most likely candidate to run against Saeed Jalili in the second round of the elections, scheduled for June 21. To appease the clerical classes, he wore a black-and-white Keffiyeh over his shoulders throughout his campaign, a signal that he upheld Iran's unconditional support for the Palestinians.

Saeed Jalili, on the other hand, who was already seen as a close ally of the clerical regime, proved his devoutness as a Muslim by the telltale callus on his forehead, the result of a lifetime of devotion to the prayer mat. Interestingly, the callus was obfuscated during the election campaign by a cosmetic foundation cream, as spotted by a canny journalist in the Guardian-funded Tehran Bureau. Of course, the obfuscation was intended to soften Jalili's image. However, for both young Iranian women, whose peroxide-blond hair peeked out more and more from ever-reclining hijabs, and young Iranian men, whose chest hair could be seen beneath the now popular Faravahar necklace (a nod to Persia's pre-Islamic civilisation), the mere thought that this proven hardliner might come into power threatened to turn their own hair as white as that on Saeed Jalili's head.

Yet, even while the usual Persian party politics were playing out, and the bizarre campaigning through ethno-Islamic symbolism was on display, the roar of "E'tedal, E'tedal, E'tedal" was gaining political dominance. As the Persian word for "moderation," "E'tedal" became the slogan of candidate Hassan Rouhani, whose campaign had the blessing of Mohammad Khatami, president of Iran from 1997-2005 and leader of the embattled reformist camp. Khatami had initially endorsed Mohammad Reza Aref, a mild-mannered technocrat who was generally considered the only true reformer. However, this qualification also made Aref a risky choice, since, even as the putative election winner, he would have needed ratification by the conservative Guardian Council before taking office as president.

As things things turned out on election day, June 14, Rouhani won a clear first-round victory with a majority 50.7% of the vote, soundly defeating his nearest opponent, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, who won only 18%. The other four candidates had little impact, since it was clear to voters that Rouhani, among the candidates approved to run in the election, came the closest to backing a program of mass social reform. In the end, the presidential election campaign saw no blood, no rioting, and no need for a swift boot in the solar plexus. Job done. Goodnight, Tehran. 

The Backing of Rafsanjani

While the endorsement by Mohammad Khatami was helpful to Rouhani's  election victory, perhaps even more important was the backing of Iran's premier oligarch and (deeply shady) seventy-eight-year-old kingmaker, Hashemi Rafsanjani. Rafsanjani had wanted to run in the election himself, but had been barred from doing so by the Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei. This in itself was ironic, as it was none other than Rafsanjani who had appointed Khamenei as Supreme Leader twenty-four years earlier.

Rafsanjani remains very influential in Iran, despite tensions between himself and both the Supreme Leader and outgoing president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Rafsanjani is the chairman of the Expediency Discernment Council, a body responsible for amending the Iranian constitution, which he formulated and has headed since its inception in 1989. Rafsanjani was formerly also head of the Assembly of Experts, a group now headed by Mohammad Reza Mahdavi Kani, his close ally. This body has the power to remove the Supreme Leader--a power that is, however, highly unlikely to be invoked, since it could lead to a popular revolt against the regime and the entire concept of the Velayat-e faqih (Islamic government).

The Rift Created by Ahmadinejad Must be Resolved

Tensions within Iran's ruling elite were driven by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's aim to end corruption in the highest echelons of Iranian society, which won him the popular vote in 2005. The escalation of wealth within Iran's nouveau riche began after the death of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and the appointment of Ali Khamenei as Supreme Leader in 1989. Sections of Iran's economy were portioned off to powerful players perceived as loyal to the revolution.

Since then, a select few ruling dynasties in Iran have gained a monopoly over exported goods and control of Iran's growing domestic markets, thereby becoming incredibly wealthy and powerful. They include the Tabasi and Asgaroladi families, as well as figures such as Mohsen Rafighdoost, a wealthy Tehran merchant known as a Bazaari.

In addition, however, dynasties within the clerical and political structures have also become incredibly powerful. This development is widely viewed as a shift away from both the populist principles of the revolution and Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini's concept of Velayat-e faqih. Rumors that the Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and his son Mojtaba had amassed incredible wealth broadened over time to also include Ahmad Jannati, the Chairman of the Guardian Council and his son Ali. Ahmadinejad used those rumors as political leverage, inventing a now famous catch phrase, "Should I tell?" that deeply troubled the ruling oligarchy and created rifts in loyalty within the Sepah-e Pasdaran known as the IRGC. It will be of utmost importance, during Hassan Rouhani's first term, to repair these rifts.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Taiyeb Taheri Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Taiyeb Taheri based in England's green and pleasant land. I am a student of History and Geopolitics, and my fields of interests lie in International conflict analysis and in particular how southern and central Asia will adapt to the (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

E'tedal: the Iranian People's Call for Moderation

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend