Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 2 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 10/3/09

Dude, I Want My Party Back!

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   6 comments
Author 17880
Message David Cox
Become a Fan
  (91 fans)
- Advertisement -
It is a self-perpetuating cycle that is not new and it is not unique. It is similar in scope and appearance to the crisis which loomed as FDR took office in 1932. We have an economic slowdown that was caused and exacerbated by leaders of financial markets.

They have speculated with billions of dollars of other people's money and have lost. The money is gone! The federal government rushed in to rescue the banks, which had lost the ability to sustain themselves, by giving them billions in new money in the form of near-zero interest loans. Then the banks returned to playing the same game as before.

American home values have fallen 30% in three years. Sometime later this year the ten millionth home foreclosure will take place in the same three-year time frame. Right now 26% of all American mortgages are worth less than their purchase price and that number is expected to reach 48%.

Over fourteen million Americans are unemployed and the number is not expected to wane anytime soon. Over 50% have been unemployed for over 27 weeks and the number of new unemployed disguises the fact that millions have exhausted their unemployment benefits. They are still unemployed but no longer counted among the unemployed. They are considered discouraged workers and find themselves in a new and quiet category that does not reach the headlines.

- Advertisement -
All politicians make promises on which they do not deliver; it is the nature of the beast. Sometimes they can't deliver. Sometimes the personal cost is too high to deliver. But as we roll towards Barack Obama's first year in office I find a disturbing trend. He addresses issues with strong pronouncements, then they go into committee meetings and negotiations and what emerges is as weak as chicken soup.

The administration promised strong financial reform and what emerged had enough loop holes to drive a Kenworth through and allowed the banks to simply shift fees and charges. In half the time of the legislation, the banks had recovered all losses due to the new constraints and found new ways of becoming even more profitable.

Rather than aid struggling homeowners, the banks instead bury the bad debts in their portfolios to write off in increments as bad debt. Obama's plan offered the banks $1,000 for every mortgage rescued. Half of all mortgage bailouts still fail so as a banker why would you want to risk taking a beating twice on the same loan for a measly thousand dollars when you can borrow half a million dollars in new money from the Federal Reserve for the same price?

- Advertisement -
All roads lead to the same destination. We as a nation can never be prosperous selling services to each other. Car washes and nail salons do not create wealth, they merely exchange it. The money is in manufacturing. If you buy fifty dollars worth of components, they can become three or four hundred dollars in the form of a DVD player.

"If your government supports the unfettered ability to search the world for the lowest wages, they do so to your detriment. One other objective closely related to the problem of selling American products is to provide a tariff policy based upon economic common sense rather than upon politics, hot-air, and pull. What we must do is this: revise our tariff on the basis of a reciprocal exchange of goods, allowing other Nations to buy and to pay for our goods by sending us such of their goods as will not seriously throw any of our industries out of balance." (FDR)

That new car you just purchased under the cash for clunkers program cost the manufacturer five or six thousand dollars to produce. You purchased it at $15,000, $20,000? If the car was domestically produced, the components of the car came from a hundred different vendors who all paid wages to their workers and taxes on their profits. If the car was produced in Asia, those vendors were Asian and the taxes paid were to Asian governments.

Last month Timothy Geithner spoke and said the problem in the economy was that Americans weren't saving enough money. It was akin to telling people whose house is on fire about the importance of water conservation. You will never save yourself out of a depression; that is fanciful and almost ludicrous thinking. And it's compounded by the fact that this is a Democratic administration.

Last week former Clinton White House Chief of Staff and Obama transition team co-chairman John Podesta speculated that perhaps a value-added tax might be the correct path to balancing the federal deficit. Value-added or national sales tax has long been the darling of far right conservatives. It is the most regressive form of taxation known to mankind as it charges the same amount to rich and poor. As the conservatives called the inheritance tax the death tax, this would be the life tax. If you work to stay alive, this tax will steal the food from your mouths. It is the worst idea to come from government since Pharaoh ordered the murder of first born sons. Yet it comes from a Democrat, a Democrat closely affiliated with this administration.

You just reach a point where you sit down and ask yourself, "Who the Phuck are these people?" I've been a Democrat all my life and these people don't seem to represent my needs or concerns. Harry Truman first proposed National healthcare in 1948 as an extension of Social Security, much like the current Medicare. Simple, direct, no corporate loopholes, the public option was the whole plan in a nutshell. No committee meetings or counter proposals, here it is; vote on it, up or down.

- Advertisement -
Today we have proposals and counterproposals, five different committees' bills until it has become one giant flustercluck! No one has any idea of what is in each bill; they will all go into committee negotiations and will come out as just more chicken soup. The politicians assure us, "You're going to like this, I promise. Amended that whenever the barometric pressure rises above one hundred millibars and on days whose name is without an S or a Y, the insurance companies (herein referred to as phuckers) will be required to pay up to 65% of all medical costs unless the patient (herein referred to as phuckees) requests treatment in a hospital located on a paved street or road in any one of the four known directions."

The health care plans along with Podesta's plan for a value-added tax also offer to subsidize the poor and working class with tax credits while ignoring the obvious. If you build the economy from the ground up you wouldn't need subsidies. The subsidies are granted to the poor to pay to the rich. Why not just have the government subsidize the rich and cut out the middleman? That's what all these schemes amount to, an old-fashioned butt phucking with the promise of a reach around.

These are Democrats? Not in my world. Franklin Roosevelt took $2 billion in loans destined for the big banks and instead founded the Homeowners Loan Corporation, rescuing over one million homes in the first year of operation. The federal government eventually owned 12% of all mortgages in America. The collapse of home prices was stopped, the number of Americans thrown out into the road shrank. The value of the mortgages held by the banks stabilized. How much did this big-spending, Socialist Liberal program cost the taxpayer? Nothing, not one dime! The money was returned to the treasury with interest.

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

Must Read 2   Well Said 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

David Cox Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

I who am I? Born at the pinnacle of American prosperity to parents raised during the last great depression. I was the youngest child of the youngest children born almost between the generations and that in fact clouds and obscures who it is that (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Hobo's Lullaby

100 Reasons for Revolution

Guns or Butter

Taken at the Flood

When will the Economy Collapse? You're Looking at It!

In this Country at Least, The Revolution Will Not Be Televised