Power of Story Send a Tweet        
OpEdNews Op Eds

Donald Trump is costing us one precious thing: time

By       Message Bill McKibben       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 6/10/18

Author 50710
Become a Fan
  (20 fans)

From The Guardian

- Advertisement -

The constant sense of crisis that the president creates robs us of the concentration we need to focus on long-term issues like climate change

From flickr.com: Climate Emergency {MID-296982}
Climate Emergency
(Image by flickr.com)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

Donald Trump may be costing us many things: a sense of national decency, a stable global order, a generation of professional civil servants and diplomats. Or maybe not. Maybe we can claw those losses back -- perhaps the reaction will begin with the midterm elections and we'll slowly return our way towards something that looks like the old normal.

- Advertisement -

But he's definitely costing us one precious thing, and that's time. It rolls past every day as we stand necessarily transfixed by his transgressions, and since it can't be rolled back there are victims who -- whatever the future holds -- are paying an unrefundable price.

These thoughts were on my mind as I protested outside the Vermont governor's office with other local members of the Poor People's Campaign, the nationwide renewal of Dr Martin Luther King Jr's final crusade. (We were hoping to do a sit-in, but the door to the governor's office had been cleverly locked, perhaps after they'd heard us singing "We Shall Not Be Moved" for 20 minutes outside. If you need a crime performed efficiently, perhaps best not to hire an idealist.)

This Poor People's Campaign has been by many measures a great success, moving tens of thousands of people to action in every state capitol, around issues ranging from immigration and racial justice to healthcare and environmental justice. But it has barely broken through the president's nonstop noise into the national news, and so the stories of the people involved have been too little heard. "Grinding poverty" is a cliched phrase but it has a real meaning: the day-in day-out erosion of lives when there's too little money for doctors, for food, for transportation. This is happening, now. Real lives are being lived, and lived in needlessly cruel conditions. Real lives are being lost.

- Advertisement -

Similarly, we've all but stopped paying attention to climate change, the single greatest crisis the planet has ever faced. I sat down yesterday to read through the New York Times op-ed page from the start of the year to the first of June. There were, roughly, 660 essays, of which six seemed to bear some relation to this planet-scale trauma.

Two, by Nick Kristof, were straightforward reminders of our peril, one from Bangladesh and one from Easter Island. Two, by Tom Friedman, touched on the political implications of climate change on troubles in the Gaza and Iran. One, by Paul Krugman, laid out the excellent news about falling prices of renewable energy. And one, by rookie right-hander Bret Stephens, didn't mention climate change specifically but did excoriate myself and Naomi Klein for our dimwitted refusal to understand that our "Promethean species has shown the will and the wizardry to master" any challenge that presents itself.

One percent of the possible attention is too little for this crisis, but I'm not calling out the New York Times. Its editorial board, for decades, has been stalwart in its commitment to climate action. And I'm not sure if I was editor I would have done anything differently: how do you not write about Roseanne, about Rudy Giuliani, about Russia. When the president is baiting North Korea and separating infants from their mothers, how do you write about anything else? Its coverage of the current moment has been responsible, even exemplary. Thank heaven we've thought about harassment and about guns in new and powerful ways.

But the constant sense of crisis that Trump creates -- the endless tweets implying he might be about to further upend the constitution, or launch some new trade war -- takes a toll beyond each day's chaos. It is robbing us of the concentration we need to focus on issues that demand that attention over the long term, attention that can't endlessly be drawn away.

Climate change comes with a time limit. We don't have four years to waste ignoring it, not when Arctic sea ice is reaching new lows and temperatures are breaking records. (This week, key scientists called for tacking on a Category 6 to the top of the hurricane intensity scale.) And not when there are promising fronts beyond Washington: the biggest climate news of the year was probably New York City mayor Bill de Blasio's January decision to divest its giant pension funds from fossil fuels and sue the big oil companies, but one that slid by amid the constant Trumpian clatter.

The biggest climate summit since Paris will happen this fall in California, but it may get lost amid season three of "Unpatriotic Football Players" or whatever new provocation Trump dreams up. And that would be terrible, because this is time we'll never get back. Even if a new president someday takes up climate seriously, the carbon we're spewing now will still be in the atmosphere to haunt us over geological time. Time is the trouble.

- Advertisement -

Krugman, writing in the fall of 2016 during the presidential debate season, said it well: "It's time to end the blackout on climate change as an issue ... There is, quite simply, no other issue this important, and letting it slide would be almost criminally irresponsible."

And King, as was usually the case, said it even better: "Human progress," he wrote, "never rolls in on wheels of inevitability; it comes through the tireless efforts of men willing to work to be co-workers with God, and without this hard work, time itself becomes an ally of the forces of social stagnation."

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Bill McKibben is the author of a dozen books, including The End of Nature and Deep Economy: The Wealth of Communities and the Durable Future. A former staff writer for The New Yorker, he writes regularly for Harper's, The Atlantic Monthly, and The (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Movement to Divest from Fossil Fuels Gains Momentum

Idle No More, Think Occupy With Deeper Roots

We're not even close to being prepared for the rising waters

Global Warming's Terrifying New Math

Why the Planet Is Happy That Bernie Sanders Is Running for President

Why Dakota Is the New Keystone

Comments Image Post Article Comment

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
Connect with Facebook     Connect with Twitter            Register with Facebook     Register with Twitter

Comment:   

You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 
Username
Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments  Post Comment


Dennis Kaiser

Become a Fan
Author 10174
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Jan 22, 2008), 34 fans, 69 articles, 264 quicklinks, 4780 comments, 48 diaries


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

Return to the old normal? You have to be kidding or haven't been aware of the decline of our nation in the past three decades. Global warming or climate change is still nothing but a wedge issue keeping people apart rather than uniting, our once three branch government has been reduced to nothing but a clearinghouse for the wealthy wet dreams, our infrastructure has declined to where some third world nations' looks great, and I could go on.

On the matter of climate change, I do not believe it is Trump who is making all of the negative hit pieces on Tesla, for example. Almost daily there is some negative piece regarding their all-electric vehicles which could have no other goal, but to turn the peoples' interest in going electric in order to help save the environment. For one example, and there are many, one Tesla vehicle's battery catches fire and it has been on front pages in newspapers, has been on the major networks, and still we hear of it, yet the fact there are an average of 200+ gasoline/diesel vehicle fires every day, yet we hear nothing of any of those. Another Tesla gets rear-ended on the highway by a BMW which was having a drag race with another vehicle and the Tesla gets front page coverage.

In short, rather than attempt to build interest in electric vehicles the Corporate Media Propagandists (CMP) are on a campaign tearing them down.

Going further rather than encourage the use of renewable energy sources states are passing Koch-purchased laws that not only discourage it but make it near impossible. For example, in the state of Ohio, they are about to pass a law that actually cuts back on renewable sources for the utilities as they now must generate their energy from 12% of their over-all, but the new law would reduce that to 8.8%. On top of that homeowners cannot "sell back" any unused energy to the utility has been eliminated, whereas in Australia, for example, a reality utility is being built with every home having its own solar system.

So, returning to the normal in the United States is only continuing the downward spiral. To report that Trump is putting that on hold or slowing it down may actually be a good thing.

Submitted on Sunday, Jun 10, 2018 at 10:17:36 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
Indent

Kenneth Johnson

Become a Fan
Author 94318

(Member since Jun 24, 2014), 18 fans, 11 articles, 8 quicklinks, 2500 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to Dennis Kaiser:   New Content

If we lived in a country which operated under a fair profit motive system, individuals who install solar should be able to sell-back excess sun energy, thereby benefiting themselves and our country in significant way.

Submitted on Monday, Jun 11, 2018 at 12:01:32 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment