Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
General News    H2'ed 6/8/08

Don Siegelman and the Bush Double Standard

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   3 comments
Author 13717
Message Roger Shuler
- Advertisement -

Don Siegelman, former Democratic governor of Alabama, is out of federal prison while he fights his conviction on corruption-related charges. At the heart of the Siegelman case was a charge that he received a campaign contribution from a supporter and then took actions that benefited that supporter.

As Siegelman's case works its way through the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, it is becoming more and more clear that a contribution of this sort does not constitute federal-funds bribery and the case never should have been prosecuted.

But here is what's most striking about the aftermath of the Siegelman case: His successor, Republican Bob Riley, took a campaign contribution from a supporter and then helped steer millions of state dollars toward that contributor--resulting in a new biotechnology center in Huntsville, Alabama. This transaction took place even though Alabama already has a vibrant biotech infrastructure at UAB and Southern Research Institute in Birmingham.

- Advertisement -

Representatives from the Huntsville biotech center recently traveled with Riley to Brazil to examine processes used there to turn sugar cane into biofuels. Evidently they plan to take knowledge picked up in Brazil and return to Alabama to make bucket fulls of cash.

Are Riley's supporters benefiting from their contribution to his campaign? Sure looks like it. Is the "deal" involving Siegelman substantially different from the "deal" involving Riley? Not that we can see. Does the Bush Justice Department, which was so eager to go after Siegelman and supporter Richard Scrushy, show any signs of going after Riley and the Huntsville biotech crowd? Not on your life.

In real life, that's called a double standard. In terms of justice, it's called selective prosecution. And that's why the U.S. House Judiciary Committee needs to keep a close eye on Alabama as it investigates the politicization of the Justice Department under George W. Bush.

- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

Rate It | View Ratings

Roger Shuler Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

I live in Birmingham, Alabama, and work in higher education. I became interested in justice-related issues after experiencing gross judicial corruption in Alabama state courts. This corruption has a strong political component. The corrupt judges are (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Boy Scouts and the Horrors of Their "Perversion Files"

Bush vs. Obama on Spending: It's No Contest

Why Is Karl Rove Planning to Visit the Backwoods of Alabama?

What's the Real Story Behind Karl Rove's Divorce?

Is "Morning Joe" Scarborough a Murderer?

Rove Might Be Trying To "Pull A Siegelman" With Julian Assange