Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Poll Analyses
Share on Facebook 13 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 3/5/20

Does the Democratic Establishment Really Fear That Bernie CAN Win in November?

Author 1530
Message Jeff Cohen
Become a Fan
  (1 fan)

From ZNet

Bernie Sanders
Bernie Sanders
(Image by Wikipedia (commons.wikimedia.org))
  Details   DMCA

Mainstream news outlets keep pounding home the same message that the "Democratic establishment" or "Democratic moderates" are worried sick that Bernie Sanders can't beat Trump. They worry about a Trump landslide, and a "down-ballot disaster" in Congressional races.

Democratic insiders, we're told, fear a re-run of 1972 when progressive antiwar candidate George McGovern lost 49 of 50 states to Richard Nixon. Given our divided electoral map, with nearly 40 states safely blue or red, such a scenario in 2020 is thoroughly absurd.

That didn't stop now-ex-MSNBC host Chris Matthews who abruptly resigned Monday after having had an on-air, Sanders-induced crack-up in recent weeks from offering this prophecy in mid-February: "I was there in 1972 at the Democratic convention when the people on the left were dancing in glee. . . And they went on to lose 49 states in their glee. So that could happen again. So clearly. That's what I see. It could happen again."

Let's put aside that mad prediction. Or Matthews' paranoid Cold War comment linking Sanders somehow to public executions in New York's Central Park. Or his comparison of Sanders' triumph in Nevada to the finality of the Nazi conquest of France. Or his sexism.

And let's recognize that even a crazed TV character like Network's Howard Beale is capable of blurting out an important truth once in a while. On the eve of the Nevada caucus, Matthews let the cat out of the bag about the true fears of many in the Democratic establishment:

"I'm wondering whether the Democratic moderates want Bernie Sanders to be President. Maybe that's too exciting a question to raise they don't like Trump at all. Do they want Bernie Sanders to take over the Democratic Party in perpetuity? If he takes it over, he sets the direction of the future of the party. Maybe they'd rather wait four years and put in a Democrat that they like."

Notice that the worry here is not that Sanders will lose, but that he will win. And proceed to transform the Democratic Party. And presumably the country.

Matthews was not expressing fear of 1972. It was more like fear of 1932. That's when Franklin Roosevelt (a Sanders hero) triumphed and propelled by labor and socialist movements transformed society with a New Deal benefiting working people.

The corporate media's "Bernie can't win" drumbeat should arouse skepticism among news consumers. First, because political outcomes are difficult to predict especially after an unstable reality-TV star and a young African American (middle name "Hussein") won the White House. Second, because few have been more wrong for so long in their predictions than mainstream media pundits and their pals in the Democratic establishment.

In 2000, the cautious candidate of the Democratic establishment, Al Gore, was sure to win. He didn't. In 2004, they told us the ever-vacillating John Kerry was the most electable. He lost. In 2016, media and party elites pushed hard for Hillary Clinton against the Sanders challenge, insisting she was the candidate who could beat Trump. She didn't.

As a newspaper of the corporate Democratic establishment (and endorser of Gore, Kerry and Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries), the New York Times has long repeated the "Bernie can't win" mantra. So I give the Times credit for publishing an important opposing view last week in a guest column by analyst Steve Phillips of Democracy in Color: "Bernie Sanders Can Beat Trump. Here's the Math."

Phillips cites head-to-head polling that shows Sanders beating Trump nationally and "outperforming Mr. Trump in polls of the pivotal battleground states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania."

Phillips says the changing electorate (even from 2016 to 2020) and the particular way that Sanders won the popular vote in Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada augur well for Sanders as the candidate who best matches up against Trump:

"In all three early states, he received twice as much support from voters under 30 than his closest competitor. In Nevada, he received about 70 percent of the vote in the most heavily Latino precincts. . . This will be the most racially diverse electorate ever, with people of color making up fully one-third of all eligible voters. The share of eligible voters from Generation Z (18-23-year-olds) will be more than twice as large in 2020 as it was in 2016."

More than other contenders, Sanders has shown he can inspire the two fastest-growing, anti-Trump sectors of the electorate youths and Latinos. Writes Phillips: "In Michigan and Wisconsin, which were decided in 2016 by roughly 11,000 and 22,700 votes respectively, close to a million young people have since turned 18." He notes that "160,000 Latinos have turned 18" in Arizona, a state Trump won by only 91,000 votes.

I co-produced a documentary in which we interviewed working-class whites in the Rust Belt of Ohio, longtime Democrats who'd voted for Obama, voted for Sanders in the 2016 Democratic primary and then jumped to Trump (often out of anger over NAFTA). These are the so-called "Obama-Trump voters" and no Democratic nominee is likely to win more of them back than Sanders.

The progressive senator is also "most likely to reclaim those Democratic voters who defected to the Green Party" the "Obama-Stein voters." As Phillips points out: "The increase in votes for Jill Stein from 2012 to 2016 was greater than Mr. Trump's margin of victory in Michigan and Wisconsin."

As the South Carolina primary showed, one crucial voting bloc that Sanders has so far had trouble inspiring is older African Americans although he beat Biden among blacks under 30, according to an NBC News exit poll.

If mainstream media spent less time on horse-race analysis and dubious predictions, and more time accurately presenting the candidates' records, perhaps almost every voter of every color would know that Sanders was a brave civil rights activist at the University of Chicago -- a student leader in the then-renowned Congress on Racial Equality (CORE), who "sat-in" and was arrested protesting discrimination against African Americans.

The pictures of young Bernie in action are dramatic and important to see.

At least as important as seeing Trump swing a golf club or watching the latest anti-Sanders smear from TV pundits carrying on the Chris Matthews tradition.

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Jeff Cohen Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Jeff Cohen was director of the Park Center for Independent Media at Ithaca College, where he was an associate professor of journalism. He founded the progressive media watch group FAIR.org in 1986.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Mystique of “Free-Market Guy” Obama

Will Joe Biden Be a Rerun of 2016 Tragedy?

Snowden Coverage: If U.S. Mass Media Were State-Controlled, Would They Look Any Different?

Let's Not Restore or Mythologize Obama

RootsAction.org: New Independent Progressive Group

Stepford Republicans: All Caught on Tape!

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments


Dennis Kaiser

Become a Fan
Author 10174
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Jan 22, 2008), 40 fans, 71 articles, 573 quicklinks, 6261 comments, 48 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

They are not afraid of Bernie, but they fear his agenda and a few of the people he would most likely have in his administration, namely Tulsi Gabbard and they know she is relentless in her pursuit of that agenda. I think they feel they could control Bernie, but not Tulsi.

Submitted on Thursday, Mar 5, 2020 at 9:33:15 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Help

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment