Power of Story Send a Tweet        

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Depriving a School Board of Ignorance

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Carl Petersen       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 11/19/17

Author 503224
Become a Fan
  (5 fans)
- Advertisement -

"At the Los Angeles Unified School District, our goals are...5. School safety"

- LAUSD

Given the vastness of the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) bureaucracy, there is no guarantee that the members of the School Board knew that Granada Hills Charter High School (GHCHS) had been cited for making unauthorized modifications to their District owned campus that threatened student and staff safety. Therefore, I used my three minutes of public comment at the LAUSD November 14, meeting to make the board members aware of this situation:

- Advertisement -

(Image by YouTube, Channel: Carl Petersen)   Permission   Details   DMCA
As I understand the rules set by the previous iteration of this Board, parents at charter schools are supposed to be notified when a Notice of Violation is issued to a school. Earlier this year a Notice of Violation was issued to Granada Hills Charter High School, but as a parent, it was never sent to me. I only found it through doing an unrelated Public Records Act request through the school. Instead, it was buried within an electronic newsletter with a link to the letter that I am passing out.

What that letter did not state was that this was a Notice of Violation which included the warning that there was "a risk to the health and safety of your students, staff, and other individuals." Nor did it say that the school was accused of violating the law by "failing to obtain necessary review and approval of the plans for the identified alterations from the Division of State Architect (DSA)."

It also stated: "immediately stop all use of the facilities identified in Exhibit A...for the health and safety of students staff and other individuals". Included on that list was a "Lunch Shelter Area that is structurally unstable. It is an immediate safety hazard and must be fenced off until removed or constructed to the District's standards and applicable laws." It further warned that the "Lunch Shelter Area that is structurally unstable" and is in danger of a "partial [or] total collapse.

- Advertisement -

According to a source within the District, "everything that was red-tagged is still red-tagged and will remain off-limits until the plans are approved by the District, then go through DSA, and the work gets done, inspected, and accepted." However, during a recent visit to the school for a choir concert for my daughter, the lunch area that appears to be the one referenced by the notice was not fenced off and was being used. The last page of the packet has pictures of that area and it is clearly still in use.

The school did remove some sheet metal that they had added to the roof of the structure which was causing extra weight. However, the notice had stated that "the existing beams are sagging and deformed due to the extra load. This area should not be used by students and barricaded immediately until safety measures are completed." It also said that "the columns are no longer plumb, and the whole structure appears to be shifting."

This is clearly a danger. The District informed the school that no one should be using that area. Yet, it appears to be still in use. I'd like to know who is protecting the students?

You should also note that Granada is a conversion charter. That is District property. If something happens after this notice, it is the District who is on the hook. You are going to be responsible not only monetarily but morally for what happens to those children.

You need to look into this.


(Image by Carl J Petersen)   Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -
As of Friday, the Lunch Shelter was still being used by the students of GHCHS. This seems to provide further proof that the Board is less interested in putting "Kids First" than it is in serving its benefactors at the California Charter School Association.

____________________________________________

Carl Petersen is a parent and special education advocate, elected member of the Northridge East Neighborhood Council and was a Green Party candidate in LAUSD's District 2 School Board race. During the campaign, he was endorsed by Network for Public Education (NPE) Action and Dr. Diane Ravitch called him a "strong supporter of public schools." His past blogs can be found at www.ChangeTheLAUSD.com.

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

As a father of five, I have personally seen what happens when the LAUSD's massive bureaucracy stands in the way of our students. In my case, the district made me fight for the services that my daughters' teachers agreed they required. I knew (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Make it a Headline When Trump Actually Tells the Truth

Bright Shiny Objects: Trump's Real Art is Diverting Attention

If Money Continues to Talk, We're Screwed

Finding Hope in Florida

Three Headlines That Got Buried Last Week

The Conman-In-Chief and His Unshakable Fans