Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 23 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H1'ed 10/10/21

Democrats and Media Do Not Want to Weaken Facebook, Just Commandeer its Power to Censor

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   7 comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 4807
Message Glenn Greenwald
Become a Fan
  (150 fans)

From Substack

"Whistleblower" Frances Haugen is a vital media and political asset because she advances their quest for greater control over online political discourse.

Facebook Icons
Facebook Icons
(Image by Bengkel Mobil Kuningmas Auto Care from flickr)
  Details   DMCA

Much is revealed by who is bestowed hero status by the corporate media. This week's anointed avatar of stunning courage is Frances Haugen, a former Facebook product manager being widely hailed as a "whistleblower" for providing internal corporate documents to the Wall Street Journal relating to the various harms which Facebook and its other platforms (Instagram and WhatsApp) are allegedly causing.

The social media giant hurts America and the world, this narrative maintains, by permitting misinformation to spread (presumably more so than cable outlets and mainstream newspapers do virtually every week); fostering body image neurosis in young girls through Instagram (presumably more so than fashion magazines, Hollywood and the music industry do with their glorification of young and perfectly-sculpted bodies); promoting polarizing political content in order to keep the citizenry enraged, balkanized and resentful and therefore more eager to stay engaged (presumably in contrast to corporate media outlets, which would never do such a thing); and, worst of all, by failing to sufficiently censor political content that contradicts liberal orthodoxies and diverges from decreed liberal Truth. On Tuesday, Haugen's star turn took her to Washington, where she spent the day testifying before the Senate about Facebook's dangerous refusal to censor even more content and ban even more users than they already do.

There is no doubt, at least to me, that Facebook and Google are both grave menaces. Through consolidation, mergers and purchases of any potential competitors, their power far exceeds what is compatible with a healthy democracy. A bipartisan consensus has emerged on the House Antitrust Committee that these two corporate giants along with Amazon and Apple are all classic monopolies in violation of long-standing but rarely enforced antitrust laws. Their control over multiple huge platforms that they purchased enables them to punish and even destroy competitors, as we saw when Apple, Google and Amazon united to remove Parler from the internet forty-eight hours after leading Democrats demanded that action, right as Parler became the most-downloaded app in the country, or as Google suppresses Rumble videos in its dominant search feature as punishment for competing with Google's YouTube platform. Facebook and Twitter both suppressed reporting on the authentic documents about Joe Biden's business activities reported by The New York Post just weeks before the 2020 election. These social media giants also united to effectively remove the sitting elected President of the United States from the internet, prompting grave warnings from leaders across the democratic world about how anti-democratic their consolidated censorship power has become.

But none of the swooning over this new Facebook heroine nor any of the other media assaults on Facebook have anything remotely to do with a concern over those genuine dangers. Congress has taken no steps to curb the influence of these Silicon Valley giants because Facebook and Google drown the establishment wings of both parties with enormous amounts of cash and pay well-connected lobbyists who are friends and former colleagues of key lawmakers to use their D.C. influence to block reform. With the exception of a few stalwarts, neither party's ruling wing really has any objection to this monopolistic power as long as it is exercised to advance their own interests.

And that is Facebook's only real political problem: not that they are too powerful but that they are not using that power to censor enough content from the internet that offends the sensibilities and beliefs of Democratic Party leaders and their liberal followers, who now control the White House, the entire executive branch and both houses of Congress. Haugen herself, now guided by long-time Obama operative Bill Burton, has made explicitly clear that her grievance with her former employer is its refusal to censor more of what she regards as "hate, violence and misinformation." In a 60 Minutes interview on Sunday night, Haugen summarized her complaint about CEO Mark Zuckerberg this way: he "has allowed choices to be made where the side effects of those choices are that hateful and polarizing content gets more distribution and more reach." Haugen, gushed The New York Times' censorship-desperate tech unit as she testified on Tuesday, is "calling for regulation of the technology and business model that amplifies hate and she's not shy about comparing Facebook to tobacco."

Agitating for more online censorship has been a leading priority for the Democratic Party ever since they blamed social media platforms (along with WikiLeaks, Russia, Jill Stein, James Comey, The New York Times, and Bernie Bros) for the 2016 defeat of the rightful heir to the White House throne, Hillary Clinton. And this craving for censorship has been elevated into an even more urgent priority for their corporate media allies, due to the same belief that Facebook helped elect Trump but also because free speech on social media prevents them from maintaining a stranglehold on the flow of information by allowing ordinary, uncredentialed serfs to challenge, question and dispute their decrees or build a large audience that they cannot control. Destroying alternatives to their failing platforms is thus a means of self-preservation: realizing that they cannot convince audiences to trust their work or pay attention to it, they seek instead to create captive audiences by destroying or at least controlling any competitors to their pieties.

As I have been reporting for more than a year, Democrats do not make any secret of their intent to co-opt Silicon Valley power to police political discourse and silence their enemies. Congressional Democrats have summoned the CEO's of Google, Facebook and Twitter four times in the last year to demand they censor more political speech. At the last Congressional inquisition in March, one Democrat after the next explicitly threatened the companies with legal and regulatory reprisals if they did not immediately start censoring more.

A Pew survey from August shows that Democrats now overwhelmingly support internet censorship not only by tech giants but also by the government which their party now controls. In the name of "restricting misinformation," more than 3/4 of Democrats want tech companies "to restrict false info online, even if it limits freedom of information," and just under 2/3 of Democrats want the U.S. Government to control that flow of information over the internet:

The prevailing pro-censorship mindset of the Democratic Party is reflected not only by that definitive polling data but also by the increasingly brash and explicit statements of their leaders. At the end of 2020, Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA), newly elected after young leftist activists worked tirelessly on his behalf to fend off a primary challenge from the more centrist Rep. Joseph Kennedy III (D-MA), told Facebook's Zuckerberg exactly what the Democratic Party wanted. In sum, they demand more censorship:

This, and this alone, is the sole reason why there is so much adoration being constructed around the cult of this new disgruntled Facebook employee. What she provides, above all else, is a telegenic and seemingly informed "insider" face to tell Americans that Facebook is destroying their country and their world by allowing too much content to go uncensored, by permitting too many conversations among ordinary people that are, in the immortal worlds of the NYT's tech reporter Taylor Lorenz, "unfettered."

When Facebook, Google, Twitter and other Silicon Valley social media companies were created, they did not set out to become the nation's discourse police. Indeed, they affirmatively wanted not to do that. Their desire to avoid that role was due in part to the prevailing libertarian ideology of a free internet in that sub-culture. But it was also due to self-interest: the last thing social media companies wanted to be doing is looking for ways to remove and block people from using their product and, worse, inserting themselves into the middle of inflammatory political controversies. Corporations seek to avoid angering potential customers and users over political stances, not courting that anger.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

 

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Supported 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

Glenn Greenwald Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

[Subscribe to Glenn Greenwald] Glenn Greenwald is a journalist,former constitutional lawyer, and author of four New York Times bestselling books on politics and law. His most recent book, "No Place to Hide," is about the U.S. surveillance state and his experiences reporting on the Snowden documents around the world. His forthcoming book, to be published in April, 2021, is about Brazilian history and current politics, with a focus on his experience in reporting a series of expose's in 2019 and 2020 which exposed high-level corruption by powerful officials in the government of President Jair Bolsonaro, which subsequently attempted to prosecute him for that reporting.

Foreign Policy magazine named Greenwald one of the top 100 Global Thinkers for 2013. He was the debut winner, along with "Democracy Now's" Amy Goodman, of the Park Center I.F. Stone Award for Independent Journalism in 2008, and also received the 2010 Online Journalism Award for his investigative work breaking the story of the abusive (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

HSBC, too big to jail, is the new poster child for US two-tiered justice system

US investigates possible WikiLeaks leaker for "communicating with the enemy"

Prosecution of Anonymous activists highlights war for Internet control

4 quick points about the MSNBC discussion

The myth of Obama's "blunders" and "weakness"

The Remarkable, Unfathomable Ignorance of Debbie Wasserman Schultz

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

5 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments


David William Pear

Become a Fan
Author 500873
(Member since Nov 29, 2014), 55 fans, 91 articles, 485 quicklinks, 5458 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Now they want to go after our books. We are fast becoming a total fascist country. Where are the liberals? Silence is complicity.

Getting rid of misinformation then and now, it doesn't happen overnight, it is insidious:

Submitted on Monday, Oct 11, 2021 at 11:36:41 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (6+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
Indent

Jill Herendeen

Become a Fan
Author 18898
(Member since Jul 18, 2008), 22 fans, 2 articles, 3421 comments, 1 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to David William Pear:   New Content

Where are the liberals? We're being told that the Democrats ARE the liberals. ROFLMAO!

Submitted on Tuesday, Oct 12, 2021 at 10:21:52 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (1+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

John Lawrence Ré

Become a Fan
Author 78374
(Member since Apr 17, 2012), 29 fans, 4 articles, 2344 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

It's an Orwellian age of jejune dysfunction. .youtube.com/watch?v=iAlVMF2vBDo The legacy of 2016 has to be TDS. It uncovered the tragic flaw that lay dormant in the psyche of establishment liberals: a deep-seated need to punish, rebuke and discriminate against anyone or anything that challenges their proclaimed rectitude, spawning an age where diversity of race and gender is applauded but diversity of thought and opinion is condemned. It's not quite a 1984 scenario, but rather an adaptation of 1984 as Theater of the Absurd.

The absurdity is that TDS has rewired the ethos of establishment liberals into a patronizing melodrama of do as we say, not as we do. Which would be fine if it was performed by resolute geniuses and not a feverish clique of weaklings as evidenced by such inanities as the Havana Syndrome - the 2020's version of Reefer Madness: .youtube.com/watch?v=S65ZUIxsgOc The tragedy lies in the splintered platform for change and all that wasted education, all those internships of noblesse oblige gone for naught . . . an intellectual demise of an entire demographic that's played out like a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

Oscar Wilde warned of this "tyranny of the weak over the strong." Now in the post-Trump era it has emerged as a new half-assed establishment of authoritarian nebbishes, paranoid martyrs, tattletale conformists and bandwagon celebrities who excel at alienating the public and gaslighting the most vulnerable. But the most damaging aspect of their ascension to power is that they've commandeered the media to a baizuo narrow-mindedness, abrading the Bill of Rights and hurting everyone - especially the working class, rural poor and independent thinkers. Revenge of the Nerds, indeed.

Submitted on Monday, Oct 11, 2021 at 2:21:55 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (4+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
Indent

John Zwiebel

Become a Fan
Author 509185
(Member since Jun 19, 2017), 3 fans, 3 articles, 4 quicklinks, 1092 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to John Lawrence Ré:   New Content

"Oscar Wilde warned of this "tyranny of the weak over the strong."

I thought that was Ayn Rand. ;-)

Submitted on Monday, Oct 11, 2021 at 9:40:56 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
IndentIndent

John Lawrence Ré

Become a Fan
Author 78374
(Member since Apr 17, 2012), 29 fans, 4 articles, 2344 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to John Zwiebel:   New Content

She plagerized Wilde's "The worst form of tyranny the world has ever known the tyranny of the weak over the strong. It is the only tyranny that lasts." He was decrying socialism.

Submitted on Monday, Oct 11, 2021 at 10:11:58 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (2+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
Indent

David William Pear

Become a Fan
Author 500873
(Member since Nov 29, 2014), 55 fans, 91 articles, 485 quicklinks, 5458 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to John Lawrence Ré:   New Content

Excellent comment. Really drives home the condition of the "liberal class". They have become zombiefied--- the tyranny of the undead over the living.

TDS is the result of latent fascist being revolted by seeing their own shadow in Trump. Like the latent homosexual who beats up "queers" because he is in violent denial of his own homosexual desires. People with TDS want to punish everyone who does not share their hatred of Trump in order to exercise their inter-trump.

In the name of "liberalism" TDS wants to censor speech, ban books, arrest white extremists, impose medical martial law, mandate vaxxinations, prohibit peaceful protest, impose segregation, applaud surveillance, and call anything they don't like domestic terrorism.

Submitted on Tuesday, Oct 12, 2021 at 6:33:59 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

Michael Dewey

Become a Fan
Author 11470
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Feb 15, 2008), 18 fans, 23 articles, 7 quicklinks, 4461 comments, 17 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)

"When shall it be said in any country of the world, my poor are happy; neither ignorance nor distress is to be found among them; my jails are empty of prisoners, my streets of beggars; the aged are not in want, the taxes are not oppressive...when these things can be said, then may that country boast of its constitution and government."~ Thomas Paine"
       -- Tom Paine

Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

I see Giant Tech Corporations like FB, Twitter all MSM etc being turned into a 50-50 Public-Private Utilities with the Public profits going to all having enough to eat and peaceful solutions around the world. Seems as if been a head of my time for 27 years now. Hope it happens before I'm no longer walking this crowded boiling melting pot we been thrown down to, and are riding back home on.

Submitted on Tuesday, Oct 12, 2021 at 5:12:29 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (1+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment