Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (2 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment
OpEdNews Op Eds

Democrats Must Stop Whining

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Michael Roberts       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


Author 7008
Become a Fan
  (17 fans)
- Advertisement -

Now that the hoopla has died down over what many perceived as President Barack Obama's lack luster performance during the first Presidential Debate against Republican Challenger Mitt Romney, I've decided to take a cold, sober look at the facts -- not the partisan hype that saturated the airwaves in the aftermath. The salivating field day by the punditocracy, spinmeisters and Sunday morning talking heads is just about over. Now they are focusing on the next debate making all kinds of suggestions as to what the president has to do or not do. Seems everybody is now a debate expert.


For Republicans it was bragging rights after the debate and the unsubstantiated giddy-headed claim that this was a Romney game-changer. For Democrats it was the Chicken Liken Syndrome -- the political sky was literally falling. As Team Romney went on offense, sucking up its new found favorite campaign status, the Democrats ratcheted up the whining knob on the political dial as if the president's debate performance had cost him the presidency. As a political campaign strategist I have seen the president do far better debates and I am experienced enough to understand that Romney did w hat he had to do against an incumbent president -- go on offense.


- Advertisement -

Point is what do you do when your champion loses Round I? do you whine, gripe, blame and run scared at the slightest sign of opposition? Or as Democratic strategist James Carville would say "suck it up and prepare for a comeback"?   As Democrats we have to rally around our champion; accept the Round I results and prepare for Rounds II and III. We need to analyze what went wrong, correct it, and go after the other guy with gusto.


So Democrats must stop the silly endless post-debate analyses, saying the same things over and over again in different ways. That's not going to change the outcome. Democrats had better get back on the horse and urge supporters to come out and vote on November 6 and draw a sharp contrast between Champion Obama and Challenger Mitt Romney. No amount of griping and whining is going to reverse the outcome of the first debate. Put it to rest, refocus, and let's win this thing.

- Advertisement -


And by the way, speaking loud and saying nothing is a vacuous debate strategy designed to garner sound bites and to deflect from real debate on issues. Aggression and bullying are the tactics of the insecure. Calmness and composure those of the secure and competent. While style and technique matters in any debate, so is substance. But substance does not sit well with the media and the punditry because it's not newsworthy.


So substance has been replaced by the media trolling for   "zingers," non-issues, lies, half-truths and spin. That's what makes for juicy evening news tid-bits. Mitt Romney is an expert at this. With twenty-seven lies in 38 minutes that was a monumental feat -- even for Mitt Romney. But he accomplished that with time to spare while the President Obama, well, just let things slide. I don't know what the Obama Campaign debate strategy was but one thing is clear -- it did not work. It also sent his base into convulsions, anger and contortions to explain why his PERFORMANCE, not the substance of this arguments, were so flaccid.


I am still in a state of shock over the tsunami of inane hackery from the liberal Left and their jaundiced belief that President Obama needs to be more aggressive and bullish in Debate Number II. So my question is this: should the president become like Mitt Romney? I for one think not. He has to be himself and if he was off of his game for one debate, let's give the guy the benefit of the doubt and see what he does in Debate Number II.

- Advertisement -


Me? I'm a wonkish kind of guy; I like policy issues and believe that government has a sacred right to help the 47% that need a hand up -- not a hand out. That's what President Obama believes and he does not have to be a bully to get that across. But the political stratosphere is a strange place to be in 2012 if you are the first Black president of the United States with a determined and committed Republican Party and Establishment obsessed with making you a one term president.


Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It


MICHAEL DERK ROBERTS Small Business Consultant, Editor, and Social Media & Communications Expert, New York Over the past 20 years I've been a top SMALL BUSINESS CONSULTANT and POLITICAL CAMPAIGN STRATEGIST in Brooklyn, New York, running (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Black History Is important

Wordsmiths And The Delusional

Blacks Killing Blacks

Black On Black Crime: A Critique

2014 FIFA World Cup: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

GOP Sore Losers Brigade