Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Defusing Situations...

By       Message Rick Lanahan     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

From flickr.com/photos/34026843@N00/5247097960/: The purpose of argument should not be victory, but progress.
The purpose of argument should not be victory, but progress.
(Image by ImNotQuiteJack)
  Permission   Details   DMCA


- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Defusing Situations...

As a middle child, I often felt like the mediator in the family looking for the win-win to defuse conflicts. As a business professional, I look to find a win-win scenario for my client and the business.

- Advertisement -
What if we never look to defuse situations or for a win-win?

Imagine if firemen used gas instead of water to put out fires. This would not accomplish the goal, but it would be neat to watch.

Imagine if political and religious leaders promoted civil unrest, invasion of countries for resources and/or religious bias. The leaders may get the resources they want, but at what cost?

Now imagine, the firemen used water or other resources to contain the fire and put it out. This would not be as neat to watch, but lives and property would be saved.
- Advertisement -

Now imagine, political leaders that worked to integrate countries into the international community and onto sustainable energies, so they are not as dependent on a particular resource to support their people. This week, Obama is doing more than just imagine. He is looking to defuse the situation in the Middle East and build support going forward.
Our next President and our future political leaders have a tremendous responsibility to continue this effort in the Middle East and with many other countries around the world. This will take many years (possibly decades) to achieve.

How would you defuse and stabilize the situation in the Middle East?

Would you add gasoline to the fire or aim for a win-win scenario?

--------------------------------

As you choose leaders for the future and evaluate leader of today, you need to determine if you want a leader that will put gasoline on a fire or a leader that will help to defuse situations and aim for a win-win scenario.

Finally, imagine if we don't get countries onto sustainable energies and oil in many regions of world start to run out. Will countries attack the countries that still have reserves or work with countries to find a win-win?



Reference:
Countries Pledge 40,000 New Troops To U.N. Peacekeeping Efforts
click here

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

A former conservative turned independent. I tend to lean with Progressives. My more recent articles are written to give readers an insight, but not to take a particular position necessarily. The goal is to get readers to use critical thinking (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Conservative Era (The Era where the people and the earth lost their rights)

So do you believe in God?

Protecting corporations from EPA regulations at the expense of Climate Change.

The Patriot Act - Does the end justify the means?

The selling of military Equipment to local and state governments

Immigration: What are we waiting for...