The Green Party is not relevant as a political force for the 2016 election -- plus it is nothing but a tool for fools, who rather help Trump than actually think. But the bigger question is can they ever be relevant--I do hope they can. A breakthrough in its thinking could well make them relevant--but only in the event of the demise of the Stupidparty -an event that we happen to be strikingly close to. I have already spelled out what is a crystal-clear case against voting for Jill Stein here. Of course there are some holdouts and I am confident that most of those holdouts will do the right thing before election day. But until that that day every word spoken against Hillary Clinton (usually totally invented claptrap, assertions that I have disproven on this website -see end of the article) is just an orgasmic delight to the Ann Coulters, Hannitys and Giulianis of this world -all determined to facilitate a fascist securing the levers of power, allowing this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to destroy the Stupipdarty to slip, perhaps for ever, through our hands.
I will now allow my friend Karl to try a different tack in reaching the ears of the Jill Stein die-hards.
Dear Green Party,
When Jill said her hero was Martin Luther King, she could have connected one of his prime concepts that King wanted to implement for the black community. Dr. King called it the guaranteed income. You can find the concept in the study of his words, which have fallen to the waste side of history for obvious reasons. Jill should have known that and used that concept. Why did Dr. King believe in a guaranteed income, because he understood that the money environment dictates human behavior, even though he did not word it as such. But the premise is this: Put money into the environment and crime would dramatically disappear, because humans are not fighting over money.
If the Green Party is to be a serious force that wants to change the world, it would be best to cite the latest science on human behavior. The science states that human behavior is dictated by the environment. We all live in a system of money and scarcity, so we hurt each other to get ahead. This would have expanded the oppression concept your VP stated, and would have opened a whole new world of discussion that is more accurate than what the party presented. Bottom Line: The Green Party fell into standard thinking that will not change the world.
Here is the brutal truth. Your party will not grow unless it adopts the latest advancements of thought that can actually fix Earth. If the party does not stretch its ideas, then you are contributing to Earth's demise. Let me put it this way. Bernie Sanders had great ideas, but they were obsolete in flash of a moment due to the conditions of Earth. The Green Party must move ahead of the curve and present information that the political structure is not willing to present. It is a basic business philosophy, offer something that no one has or have thought of. This will open ears and you will get noticed, especially if you tie into the other movements like Zeitgeist, or at least the Positive Money movement of returning money back to the control of government so they may spend money on the correct infrastructure that saves Earth.
How credible can the Green Party be, if not willing to transform the Federal Reserve? There are conservatives who understand this principle. Your CNN debut missed every opportunity on how to save civilization. I urge you to thoroughly investigate the education of Peter Joseph and the Zeitgeist Movement.
Let me be very clear: the only way to save Earth is by dismantling the concept of money. If money is not dismantled, civilization will self-destruct. A resource-based economy is the only lifestyle that can save the human race. Please get with the program of survival.
Your ideas do not fully embrace survival. They are destructive offshoots of a system that will destroy us all.
Here is a quick video about human behavior that may help the Party to really investigate the correct solutions that can redesign Earth, and save Earth.
It really is an educational problem for the entire human race. I know I would like to help the Green Party. And I assume from an logical deduction, though I do not know Peter, he would too. His energy of free education sets a precedent that he would not deny you. The Green Party really needs advance thought. What is the point of trying to modify a system that will kill us?
Always Wishing You the Best -- Karl Gary.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).