Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 10 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 10/16/19

DNC is afraid of Tulsi

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   6 comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Josh Mitteldorf
Become a Fan
  (45 fans)

A chicken-hawk is someone who supports a belicose foreign agenda and advocates military interventions, but who has dodged the draft because he doesn't want to put his own body on the line.

What's the opposite of a chicken-hawk?


(Image by Hassan Sawan via youtube)   Details   DMCA

If I may coin a phrase, I'll call Tulsi Gabbard our eagle-dove. She is a Major in the US Army, and has served two tours of duty in the hot wars of Iraq and Kuwait. She's seen enough to know that American wars are inflicting tragic damage on innocent civilians, and are devastating the lives of ordinary people who have done nothing to hurt us. She knows that these wars serve no foreign policy objectives of our country--quite the opposite, our wars are turning friends into enemies, drawing trillions of dollars away from projects where they are urgently needed at home, and causing spikes in the price Americans pay for energy.

Tulsi has progressive informed, compassionate, and progressive positions on all the day's issues, but the very center of her campaign is an end to regime-change wars. Since 1898, America has been in the business of overthrowing governments around the world when they stand in the way of corporate profits. This practice is morally despicable, and it doesn't even produce economic benefit for Americans, except for a few tycoons who make their fortunes by mining other people's resources and selling them as their own.

The DNC is afraid of Tulsi precisely because she challenges the bipartisan consensus for endless war. They have gone from ignoring her to smearing her as a "Russian asset". The logic is that anyone who doesn't want to fight a nuclear war with Russia must of necessity be on Putin's payroll.


This article debunks Monday's hit piece in the NYTimes.

 

Must Read 3   Valuable 3   Well Said 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

Josh Mitteldorf Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Josh Mitteldorf, a senior editor at OpEdNews, blogs on aging at http://JoshMitteldorf.ScienceBlog.com. Read how to stay young at http://AgingAdvice.org.
Educated to be an astrophysicist, he has branched out from there to mathematical (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Twitter Bans The Donald

Artificial Earthquakes

Cold Fusion: Tangible Hope in an Age of Despair

New Scientific Study: Smoking Gun Evidence of 9/11 Explosives in WTC Dust

PayPal cuts off Bradley Manning Legal Defense; Backs Off under Grass Roots Pressure