A month before the police union in San Francisco sent a blistering letter to NFL officials recently demanding that the professional football league apologize for the "ill-advised" criticisms of police by San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick that union was the target of scathing criticism for supporting police misconduct.
That criticism of the San Francisco Police Officers' Association came in a report from a panel that conducted a yearlong investigation into policemen in that city caught sending racist, sexist and homophobic text messages. One member of that blue ribbon panel, a retired judge, blasted the police union for having established an "ugly" tone that infected the entire police department.
Salient facts about the sordid history of abusive policing in San Francisco are generally missing from most of the fevered reactions in the news media over Kaepernick's actions around the national anthem.
A 1998 report on police brutality in America conducted by Human Rights Watch stated police officials in San Francisco had failed to hold abusive officers "accountable." While San Francisco's city government paid large sums to settle civil lawsuits for police shootings, the involved officers "were not" disciplined by police officials or criminally prosecuted that HRW report noted.
Abusive policing in San Francisco, historically, has ravaged blacks and Latinos disproportionately according to repeated reports.
And, abusive policing in San Francisco is not limited to excessive use of force and fatal shootings. A 2013 report by the ACLU stated blacks in San Francisco were 4.3 times more likely than whites to endure arrest for marijuana possession. That arrest disparity existed despite blacks using marijuana less frequently than whites in the city long associated with liberalized attitudes on marijuana use.
The same San Francisco police union that has lambasted civilians for not cooperating with police to solve crimes had directed its members to stiff-arm that panel through refusal to cooperate in the text message investigation. That racist texting scandal has produced the dismissal of over a dozen criminal cases and a reinvestigation of thousands of other cases for possible bias by those texting cops.
Three months before Colin Kaepernick's late August decision not to stand for America's national anthem in protest of police brutality and other racism in American society San Francisco's police chief was forced to resign due to a series of fatal shootings by police under questionable circumstances. One fatal shooting, of a black woman, occurred hours before the chief's resignation.
Those fatal shootings and a litany of other police abuses in San Francisco had triggered regular protests. The opposition to abusive policing even included a April 2016 hunger strike by protestors outside of a police station demanding the resignation of the city's police chief and mayor. The chief's resignation came weeks after the onset of that hunger strike by a five-person group that included a 66-year-old grandmother and pre-school operator who feared danger to her grandson from police.
The media failure to contextualize Kaepernick's complaint about "bodies in the street"and"people getting away with murder" is a prime example of one festering critique of media coverage: text without context is pretext.
The four San Francisco officers who fatally shot Alex Nieto on March 21, 2014, in a barrage of 59 bullets, did not face criminal charges from prosecutors. The gunfire that killed Nieto in a park as he headed to his job included bullets fired into Nieto while he lay wounded on the ground. Nieto wore a 49ers jacket when felled by police, a counterpoint to fans that have burned Kaepernick's jersey in protest of Kaepernick's protest against police brutality.
Kaepernick's complaints about abusive policing exist on both the levels of macro (nationwide) and micro (San Francisco specific). Placing Kaepernick's complaints in the proper perspective of squarely within the city limits of San Francisco reveals the validity of his argument that too many indignantly dismiss as inane.
Little known outside the Bay Area is the history of abuse and racism within San Francisco's police force -- the very misconduct driving the complaints of Kaepernick.
A February 1969 editorial in a black owned San Francisco newspaper decried a 25-year failure of officials and residents to assist the "hundreds of nameless black citizens who have been brutalized by a sadistic police department."
In November 1978 -- twenty years before that Human Rights Watch report -- the NAACP civil rights organization in San Francisco blasted "a pattern" of brutality by San Francisco police and discriminatory employment practices within that city's police department.