Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (3 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   3 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Criminal Injustice

By       Message Kathy Malloy       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Interesting 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 11/19/09

Author 16810
Become a Fan
  (55 fans)
- Advertisement -
Why are Republicans afraid of the law? Did they collectively buy into Dubya's belief that the U.S. Constitution, and therefore our entire system of government, was nothing more than a "goddam piece of paper," and, furthermore , should be abandoned if it might possibly be used to protect a swarthy Muslim?

What is so terrible about applying our system of justice to prosecute the accused criminal Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in New York City? Critics on the right claim that it is wrong to criminalize acts of terror, and that his "enemy combatant" status demands prosecution by a military tribunal. But it's important to remember that the designation "enemy combatant" was invented by the Bush Crime Family, and that neither Mohammed nor any of his accused co-conspirators were members of any kind of army or military organization, which is one of the reasons Attorney General Eric Holder decided the best course of action was to try them as criminals.

In testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Attorney General Eric H. Holder, said, "We need not cower in the face of this enemy. Our institutions are strong, our infrastructure is sturdy, our resolve is firm, and our people are ready . . . I'm not (afraid) of what Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has to say at trial and no one else has to be afraid either."

But the NeoCons are afraid. Ironically, these are the same lemming-like clump that chanted "rule-of-law, rule-of-law" when the question arose if it was proper to try a sitting President caught in a carefully designed perjury trap . . . about sex play with a "girlfriend." They wanted every comma, semi-colon, and gerund phrase of the Constitution upheld and respected when prosecuting Bill Clinton; but if the same documents might grant a fair trial to a Muslim criminal suspect? Fughetabout it.

Some Republicans argue that a criminal trial gives the impression that America really isn't involved in a war against terrorism. And if you think about it, the Bush administration never once adequately defined the "war on terror," what the parameters were, who the enemy was, how to gauge success or failure, or when "victory" would (could?) be achieved. Logic would say that when an administration declares war against a concept, rather than a nation or regime, and does so without going to Congress to obtain a legal declaration, then the only legal course that would make certain captured alleged terrorists are brought to justice would be within the parameters of our legal system.

- Advertisement -

Would the naysayers rather see these alleged criminals sit at GITMO forever? What message would that send about our system of justice and our faith in that system? Has our nation become so permanently broken that we are actually afraid to apply our own laws to criminals? Were the ideals crafted by the Founding Father's that frightening?

President Obama is confident that these critics will be silenced once a guilty verdict is obtained and Mohammed is sentenced to death. "I don't think it would be offensive at all when he's convicted and when the death penalty is applied to him," Obama told NBC News. Doubtlessly mindful of the fact that another group of anti-Obama haters would jump him for that statement, the President quickly added that he wasn't intending to prejudge the outcome of the case.

Sadly, no matter what action Obama takes in this case, it will be wrong in the eyes of the Limbot-Beck-Dittoheads; if he prosecutes Mohammed he's inviting another terrorist attack on NYC; if he leaves him at GITMO then he's ignoring the issue and sweeping the 9/11 attacks under the rug.

With this action, however, there is at least some measure of respect returned to our legal system and our Constitution, a document the so-called conservatives in this county used toclaim inviolable, until the Bush Crime Family came to power with their illegal wars and trumped-up lies about WMDs,their privacy violations, Homeland "Security," illegal wiretaps and Patriot Acts. It would be reaffirming to see it respected again.
- Advertisement -


- Advertisement -

Must Read 2   Interesting 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It


Kathy never expected a career in radio as a talk show producer. Born and raised in Atlanta, Georgia, Kathy was completing her nursing degree when in 2001 - in an emergency - she was asked to fill in as the producer of Mike's program. Within a few (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Saving Earth

March of the Mysogynists

Crooked Hillary

The Grinch Who Stole Health Reform

Insult to Injury

The Lunatics have Taken Over the Asylum