Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 2 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 3/14/14

Crimea and Western "Values"

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   4 comments
Author 73066
Message Pepe Escobar
Become a Fan
  (183 fans)

Source: Asia Times


(Image by YouTube)   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

Every sane sentient being knows that Ukraine's "unity" is not worth a new hot or warm war. Or even the current Western-peddled Cold War-style hysteria. Especially when Russia, once again, fights fascism -- as embodied by some of the key players now in power in Kiev, and the US and EU's response is to relentlessly demonize Russia. 

Crimea -- historically, culturally, sentimentally -- is Russian, conquered by Catherine the Great from the Ottomans in 1783. Sevastopol was founded by Catherine. If a swing band would play a version of I Left My Heart in Sevastopol, all hearts involved would be Russian. 

Yet those eminent Western practitioners of state idolatry have ruled that the population of Crimea has no right to conduct a referendum to decide its future -- be it rejoining Russia or remaining in Ukraine with a huge degree of autonomy, according to the 1992 constitution. The eminences could not possibly admit that does not suit their geopolitical power play. 

- Advertisement -
Thus the current Mass; a ritualistic, hysterical invoking in unison of "international law" (Obama), (distorted) history and even morality (in the US's case, considering the historical record, a positively dreadful joke). 

No question the original inhabitants of Crimea are the Tatars -- whose rights will be fully protected in a new Crimea. They had not achieved their self-determination for the same reason Native Americans also did not. 

Yet much more alarming in the whole case is how the West once again conveniently, selectively manipulates the arbitrary carving of colonized lands -- the key reason of ongoing, intractable geopolitical disasters. 

- Advertisement -
South Sudan's independence was obsessively fought for by Washington -- helped by Hollywood clones of the Clooney variety. The pretext was to correct an arbitrary colonial carving. So that applies to Sudan, but it does not apply to Crimea. 

Thomas Jefferson's "insurgents" had the right to rebel against the British, but Crimeans cannot rebel against what most view as an illegal, fascist-laden, putschist regime in Kiev.[1] 

And that is super-imposed on an arbitrary colonial carving; Ukrainian-born former premier Nikita Khrushchev, then at the head of the USSR, gave Crimea away to Ukraine, in the name of Soviet solidarity, without a Crimean referendum. 

Washington -- via a NATO war -- dismantled the former Yugoslavia in the name of the "right of nations." While Crimea is not allowed a peaceful referendum, Kosovo -- essentially a drug mafia scam -- had the right to be "liberated." It would be so complicated to explain to public opinion that was essential for the maintenance of Camp Bondsteel -- the largest military base outside of the US. The Empire of Bases trumps any "right of nations."  

The arbitrary carving of the Pakistani tribal areas via the Durand Line -- yet another imperial British masterpiece -- is the key reason for Pakistan and Afghanistan being eternally at odds. But that suits the Empire -- even at the risk of miserably losing a war (NATO in Afghanistan), because that keeps it "involved" in the crucial intersection of Central and South Asia, close to both China and Russia. 

These few examples -- Iraq in itself would be worth zillions of bytes -- show there are no "international law" or universal values. Only when the Empire says so. 

- Advertisement -
Flying blindly into the night

Obama's foreign policy could now be interpreted as the geopolitical equivalent of the doomed Malaysia Airlines Boeing, flying blindly into the deep Asian night before a fatal plunge (into the Indian Ocean?) -- taking with it a load of unsuspected costumers. 

The New Great (Threat) Game in Eurasia proceeds with its infernal logic. Russia should be sanctioned because it's not behaving like a true democracy -- those that are allowed to bomb Iraq and Libya and support weaponized jihadis in Syria, always for a good, uplifting reason. 

Would the Khaganate of Nulands gang in Washington have the balls to force Obama to sanction "communist China" because they illegally occupy Tibet and Xinjiang, without the consent of their original Tibetan and Uighur inhabitants, which will never be offered even the dream of a referendum? 

Obama said, "We completely reject a referendum patched together in a few weeks with Russian military personnel basically taking over Crimea." What he could not say is that the new supplicant puppet -- interim prime minister "Yats" -- has already kneeled before the Emperor; his "foundation" has been supported by the usual suspects (including the NED, the State Department and NATO )[2]; and that "teams from the Treasury and Justice departments and the FBI" have been to Kiev to "to unravel the kleptocracy of Yanukovych's deposed government," as the proverbial "officials" put it to US corporate media -- leading to furious, unconfirmed rumors that all Ukrainian gold deposits may have already been shipped to the US, in what would be a regal repayment for the US$5 billion or so (copyright Victoria "F**k the EU" Nuland) Washington has spent to advance regime change. 

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Well Said 5   Valuable 4   Must Read 3  
Rate It | View Ratings

Pepe Escobar Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Pepe Escobar is an independent geopolitical analyst. He writes for RT, Sputnik and TomDispatch, and is a frequent contributor to websites and radio and TV shows ranging from the US to East Asia. He is the former roving correspondent for Asia (more...)
 

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

You Want War? Russia is Ready for War

Why Putin is driving Washington nuts

Why Qatar wants to invade Syria

All aboard the New Silk Road(s)

It was Putin's missile?

Where is Prince Bandar?