Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

Crime and Capital Punishment

By       Message Harold Novikoff       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   No comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 7/4/18

Author 92139
Become a Fan
  (1 fan)

From pixabay.com: Execute Execution Capital ? Free image on Pixabay677 Ã-- 720 - 46k - png {MID-301567}
Execute Execution Capital ? Free image on Pixabay677 -- 720 - 46k - png
(Image by pixabay.com)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

With all the smoke and confusion of the Trump administration, the topic of capital punishment, which previously had taken some space in the headlines, seems to have been pushed aside. Senator Diane Feinstein did recently announce her opposition to it. Nevertheless, questions about the basic morality of CP go to the very roots of justice in our society and the world. In our country, there is the question of uniformity of practice among the various states. Nineteen states have abandoned CP. A few states conduct CP with a fury, Texas leading the way.

Who deserves to die? Generals think of infantry as lead soldiers. They value life by the numbers. There is little distinction between military and civilian losses, the latter separated by the phrase "collateral damage". Standards for criminal culpability go out the window when politicians and generals are the instigators of death.

Compare criminal justice and political justice. A political leader can cause thousands of deaths, directly or indirectly, without punishment, covering up the crime with false platitudes of heroism and patriotism. The crime of murdering one person in an act of passion may result in a penalty of death. The standards for individual justice and collective justice are completely different. Political leaders can get away with murder every time.

- Advertisement -

Politicians place strategic interests above human life. Compare the value of one's life to himself against the value of that life to society. Who is to decide if that life is to be sacrificed? Religious traditions of society grant a sacred soul to every individual starting at (or before) birth. The universally-shared moral code would justify sacrificing that life only in the most extreme circumstances - not at the whim of the politician or general.

The belief in an afterlife, common to most religions, is part of the justification for sacrificing lives in war. The soldier or casualty is not entirely sacrificed. He may have his name inscribed on a monument. He will have a better alternative life in heaven. Thus some religions may indirectly perpetuate war by sanctifying death, while others - not so innocently - encourage the sacrifice of one's own life to uphold its principles by assuring endless bliss in a rapturous afterlife.

The highest responsibility in life rests with those who are charged with the public trust and welfare, whether they realize it or not, whether from government or other positions of power. Crimes against the public trust have the greatest moral weight, The ultimate crime is to provoke wars and genocides that result in mass deaths, and similar crimes that cause great suffering of many people. With consideration for the unique preciousness of human life, I would reserve the death penalty for perpetrators of such crimes.

- Advertisement -

No court or world government exists that could enforce capital punishment against the culprit rulers. Although we see no progress towards universal peace, that aspiration exists as a possibility for the future. A world justice system, empowered to hold all leaders to account for their actions, could eliminate the source of wars and other curses of mankind. Then, instead of being a pawn to fickle politics, each individual life will have a greater and hypothetically equal value as a human being. Until that time, the world remains in a state of stagnation and decline.

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Veteran, retired from several occupations (school teacher, technical writer, energy conservation business, etc.) long-time Sierra Club member


Harold Novikoff Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Wild Fires

The Motive Behind Global-Warming Denial

Is Democracy Obsolete?

Dark Matters: The Science/Industrial Complex

High Crime in the U.S. Senate

The Lost Century