Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 10 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 11/16/19

Coups-for-Green-Energy added to Wars-For-Oil

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages) (# of views)   1 comment
Author 513617
Message Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
Become a Fan
  (1 fan)

Republished from MacskaMoksha

Salar de Uyuni salt plain in Bolivia.
Salar de Uyuni salt plain in Bolivia.
(Image by Lion Hirth, public domain)
  Details   DMCA

The US-supported right-wing coup against Bolivian President Evo Morales on November 10th was a serious strike against that nation's autonomy and its people (especially its indigenous, of whom Morales was one). Such meddling has defined US foreign policy in Latin America for nearly two centuries, since the Monroe Doctrine of 1823.

"Same song, different verse," one could say, and that's true, but each verse has different lyrics and this one features a new element (no pun intended): Lithium.

While Lithium is used as an ingredient in a wide variety of products such as pharmaceuticals, industrial lubricants, desiccants, lenses and even rocket propellants, the fastest growing application is for batteries for electric cars. According to Bloomberg, demand for lithium could "double by 2025."

Bolivia's lithium reserves are believed to be the largest in the world. A conservative estimate puts their share at nearly a quarter of the world's total, though the government has claimed it to be as high as 70% [Lithium Today]. Regardless of the exact amount, Bolivia's supply is globally recognized to be significant, enough to have attracted the attention of China and Germany, among other countries.

Obviously, US interests in Bolivia are not about democracy, freedom or the rule of law, as Trump disingenuously stated. They're not solely about lithium either; the socialist politics of Morales are anathema to capitalist elites the world over. Similarly, Iraq was not solely about oil. But with lithium, we're talking about a substance that could become "one of the most important commodities on earth" so yes, it has some bearing. [See: Bolivian Coup Comes Less Than a Week After Morales Stopped Multinational Firm's Lithium Deal and Bolivia coup against Morales opens opportunity for multinational mining companies.]

The big dream of "green energy" is that society will just be able to switch from one source to another without changing anything fundamentally. How perversely appropriate, then, that US foreign policy would not have to change fundamentally either. To wars for oil, we'll just add coups for green energy. That's not an improvement.

Here our attention is called to a big blind spot in US liberalism. "Defense" spending devours over half the discretionary budget; the Pentagon is the world's largest institutional polluter; the military has approximately 800 bases around the world in over 80 countries; at The facts are plain: the US is a bloated empire, defiling the planet and retaining our '60s era title of "greatest purveyor of violence in the world."

But these facts go virtually unmentioned by Democrats, either the leadership or the rank-and-file. Here's this monstrous institution that's exceptionally expensive, ecocidal, and murderous, and it's off the table. That's obscene.

The text of the "Green New Deal" as proposed by AOC and others does not mention military spending or activities, though both must be drastically curtailed to address the multiple environmental crises inflicting the planet. With this omission, the whole program is a non-starter. Throw it out and start over.

As far as all of this is concerned, investigative journalist Cory Morningstar hits it in the bullseye:

"Without anti-imperialism as a foundational building block of every social movement, without a comprehensive understanding of history and the existing power structures at work, we not only fail our brothers and sisters in the Global South, we fail as a species. Not only will our social justice movements be fought in vain, all legitimate ecological movements undertaken to protect what remains of our natural world will also prove to be futile."

Exactly. The stakes are high. This is no time to p*ssy-foot around, play dumb, or put our faith in half-measures. Yet we are ignoring this central truth of our world.

Further, we must take a close look at anything labeled "green." That includes lithium mining, no matter who's doing it.

The highest concentrations of lithium are found in the briny groundwater beneath salt flats. This water is pumped up and collected in shallow ponds where it is left to evaporate. The remaining precipitated solids are subjected to a chemical process to extract the lithium.

Such salt flats exist only in arid places in the world and the removal of the brine tends to lower surrounding water tables, affecting local wildlife and humans. Toxic chemicals are introduced into the water, soil and air. Heaps of sludge pile up. Plants and micro-organisms are killed and animals depart. In short, the sites subjected to this industry are irrevocably wrecked. That ain't green at all.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Must Read 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Kollibri terre Sonnenblume Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Kollibri terre Sonnenblume is a writer, photographer, tree hugger, animal lover, and dissident. Kollibri's work can be found at http://www.macskamoksha.com."



Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Chilling Arrest of Max Blumenthal

Democrats: To Beat Trump, You Need to Buck Your Leadership

Climate Change: Why is it so often "sooner than predicted"?

The Teachable Moment of the Greta Thunberg Phenomena

Unplowed Tallgrass Prairie: Rarer Than Old-Growth Forest

Our Veggie Gardens Won't Feed us in a Real Crisis

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments


David William Pear

Become a Fan Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Nov 29, 2014), 51 fans, 80 articles, 394 quicklinks, 3927 comments (View Extended Stats)
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Excellent informative article.

First, the automobile must become obsolete for both ecological reasons and for social justice. Modern public mass transportation should be part of the solution. It should be subsidized by the government; even free of charge. For those that decry "socialism", what do they think wars for the benefit of corporations at taxpayers' expense are if not corporate socialism?

Second, not only will progressive social programs not happen as long as the military squeezes them out. I question whether the public deserves the benefits until they demand an end to illegal genocidal wars of aggression. The US public must stop being "good Germans" first.

Submitted on Saturday, Nov 16, 2019 at 8:50:14 PM

  Recommend  (3+)
Help