Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 19 Share on Twitter 3 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H1'ed 2/6/20

Corporate Media Bias and the Iowa Caucus

Follow Me on Twitter     Message Joan Brunwasser
Become a Fan
  (88 fans)

Interview with Jeff Cohen, founder of FAIR, media watch group


Jeff Cohen
Jeff Cohen
(Image by Jeff Cohen)
  Details   DMCA


My guest today is Jeff Cohen, co-founder of RootsAction.org, former director of the Park Center for Independent Media at Ithaca College, and founder of FAIR, the media watch group.

Joan Brunwasser: Welcome back to OpEdNews, Jeff. We last spoke back in 2015, 26,000+ Petition Bernie Sanders to Tackle US Militarism . You were a Bernie supporter back then and appear to be one still. Your latest piece is Here are 7 pressing questions for corporate media outlets about their blatantly anti-progressive biases. Could your perspective be perhaps colored by sour grapes?

Jeff Cohen: I don't get the question. Sour grapes about Bernie not winning -- or about corporate media coverage still being biased against progressive policies and politicians?

JB: Either. I'm interested in your perspective. I'd like to bring our readers up to speed on the subject. Jump in anywhere you want.

JC: Bernie didn't win the 2016 nomination in part because the Democratic National Committee -- which was supposed to be strictly neutral in the nomination process, according to its bylaws -- put its thumb on the scale in various ways to help Hillary Clinton. Four years later, the main obstacle to Bernie winning the nomination is the corporate media system, not the DNC. Thanks to grassroots pressure within the party beginning four years ago, the DNC is acting in a more neutral fashion today. But corporate outlets -- afraid of the popularity of Bernie's proposals (and some of Warren's) -- are in a panic.

I urge folks to read my article in which I identify some of the many anti-progressive media biases -- their use of health insurance industry talking points, their obsessive focus on the price tags of progressive programs but not on the LARGER price tags of continuing the status quo -- whether re healthcare of climate. And almost never the price tags of endless wars.

JB: You know, while I have often felt that the corporate media was biased, I never really thought about the insidiously unsymmetrical demand for price tags. That's a really good point; thanks for bringing it up. How do we fight that bias, which has now been absorbed by so many usually critical voters like me?

JC: There are many informed, progressive people who are not skeptical enough and alert enough about corporate media biases, exclusions, omissions or double standards. The best approach to challenging corporate media bias is to do it together. With other activists. That's why I encourage everyone to go to the website of the progressive media watch group FAIR -- www.fair.org-- and sign up to receive their action alerts. They provide all the specific data and arguments one needs to contact news outlets about a specific bias or two, and they provide contact info to those news sites. We do that kind of response, as well, at RootsAction Education Fund -- for example, this colorful response and petition campaign after CNN's nakedly biased hosting of the Jan 14 Democratic debate.

JB: I just signed up for the newsletter, Jeff. Thanks for the suggestion. We concerned citizens really can't afford to be naive or ignorant about media bias. It's so insidious. What's the real deal about Medicare for All? Is it, or is it not, popular with the average voter? It's been so demonized by the press, it's hard to know just how popular the proposal actually is.

JC: On Iowa Caucus night, CNN was running ads from health insurance firms. During Democratic debates, TV networks run insurance company ads (hiding behind nice sounding Astroturf names) attacking Medicare for All. Despite having few proponents in mainstream opinion-shaping forums and many detractors, Medicare for All (or "single-payer") is remarkably popular. The Kaiser Family Foundation not a supporter of Medicare for All has asked this question in about 10 scientific polls over the last two years: "Do you favor or oppose a national health plan in which all Americans would get their insurance from a single government plan." Majorities of the public not just majorities of Democrats say they "favor" it.

The bias in corporate media coverage is stark. They constantly refer to a Medicare-for-All system as "government-run" healthcare. Wrong. It's government-provided insurance. Doctors and hospitals are private within Medicare (I'm over 65 and on Medicare) and doctors and hospitals would remain private if Medicare didn't have a 65-and-over age limit, just as they are today under Canada's Medicare for All system.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Joan Brunwasser Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for Election Reform (CER) which since 2005 existed for the sole purpose of raising the public awareness of the critical need for election reform. Our goal: to restore fair, accurate, transparent, secure elections where votes are cast in private and counted in public. Because the problems with electronic (computerized) voting systems include a lack of (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Other Series: View All 19 Articles in "Progressives"

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Interview with Dr. Margaret Flowers, Arrested Tuesday at Senate Roundtable on Health Care

Renowned Stanford Psychologist Carol Dweck on "Mindset: The New Psychology of Success"

Howard Zinn on "The People Speak," the Supreme Court and Haiti

Snopes confirms danger of Straight Ticket Voting (STV)

Fed Up With Corporate Tax Dodgers? Check Out PayUpNow.org!

Literary Agent Shares Trade Secrets With New Writers

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   


You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 

Username
Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments  Post Comment


Stephen Fox

Become a Fan
Author 4578
(Member since Jan 21, 2007), 32 fans, 483 articles, 891 quicklinks, 3597 comments, 14 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content
The corporate bias is going to get much much worse as they try to bring down Bernie. Really wealthy people are the most frightened and they have the most money with which to fight back.


Think about this: The Wall St. Journal is a paper for millionaires wanting to become billionaires; the New York Times is a paper owned by a Mexican Billionaire; the Washington Post is owned by a Trillionaire, and the Associated Press as well as Reuters is owned by an ancient European Family of billionaires.


What is left after they lead the charge and then the followers in the media follow obediently?


The analogy of putting their thumb on the scale is quite appropriate. I wrote about this back in 2016 when

Associated Press announced that Hillary had won 3 days before the California primary. What is that but "putting your thumb on the scale?"


Why AP Jumped the Gun

laprogressive.com/ap-names-hillary/


But, really, it boils down to this: Bernie with all of his supporters, can out wit all of such influences.



Sanders: It is a 'solemn day for the country' Senator Bernie Sanders told New Hampshire voters it was a 'serious and solemn day for the country' during his only campaign stop before leaving the state for ...
(Image by YouTube, Channel: Associated Press)
Details DMCA

Submitted on Thursday, Feb 6, 2020 at 3:32:00 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (1+)
Help
Indent

John Lawrence Ré

Become a Fan
Author 78374
(Member since Apr 17, 2012), 22 fans, 3 articles, 1525 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Stephen Fox:   New Content

"The Wall St. Journal is a paper for millionaires wanting to become billionaires; the New York Times is a paper owned by a Mexican Billionaire; the Washington Post is owned by a Trillionaire, and the Associated Press as well as Reuters is owned by an ancient European Family of billionaires." Utterly mindboggling that it's come to this... but the plutocracy is now sole editor-in-chief over information and content, and sole publisher of imperial narratives.

The more time goes by, the more ominous the Powell Memorandum becomes with its prescription for preventing revolution by controlling the media and manipulating truth. If FDR's death and the stonewalling of Henry Wallace marked the dawn of empire and the beginning of the end, then the Powell Memorandum marked the end of the beginning and the dawn of fascism.

Submitted on Friday, Feb 7, 2020 at 4:31:46 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Help

Meryl Ann Butler

Become a Fan Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Jun 5, 2006), 83 fans, 638 articles, 1962 quicklinks, 5953 comments, 7 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Great interview! I love the phrase "corporate-run healthcare"...I think we should all start using it!

Submitted on Thursday, Feb 6, 2020 at 10:49:39 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Help

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment