Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 5 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 9/26/17

Corporate Media Analysts' Indifference to US Journalists Facing 70 Years in Prison

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   No comments
Author 503181
Message Fair News

See original here

By *Adam Johnson

Journalist Alexei Wood being arrested by a DC police officer while covering the inauguration protests
Journalist Alexei Wood being arrested by a DC police officer while covering the inauguration protests
(Image by Lex Shoots)
  Details   DMCA

For over two years, many in corporate media have been trumpeting the looming threat to a free press posed by Donald Trump. "Would President Trump Kill Freedom of the Press?" Slate (3/14/16) wondered in the midst of the primaries; after the election, the New York Times (1/13/17) warned of "Donald Trump's Dangerous Attacks on the Press," and the Atlantic (2/20/17) declared it " A Dangerous Time for the Press and the Presidency."

Reporter Aaron Cantu
Reporter Aaron Cantu
(Image by Santa Fe Reporter)
  Details   DMCA

It's strange, then, that the attack on the press that kicked off the Trump administration -- the arrest and subsequent threatening of two journalists with 70 years in prison -- has been met with total silence from most of these same outlets. Aaron Cantu, Santa Fe Reporter staff writer and editor at the New Inquiry (and a contributor to FAIR.org), and professional photographer Alexei Wood are both facing decades in prison for the act of covering the January 20 unrest in DC -- charged with felony rioting for little more than being in the proximity of window-breaking and brick-throwing. (Prosecutors initially brought and then dropped felony charges against six other reporters, though how their cases differ from Cantu and Wood's is unclear.)

ACLU lawyer Scott Michelman insists that these arrests "punish journalists for being near the action" and will "inevitably chill freedom of the press and, with it, First Amendment rights not only of the journalists themselves, but of all of us."

The three most influential media reporters in US media -- CNN's Brian Stelter, New York Times' Jim Rutenberg and Washington Post's Erik Wemple -- have completely ignored the felony rioting charges leveled against the two #J20 journalists altogether. In their dozens of columns, reports, and on-air segments since the arrests nine months ago, neither Stelter nor Rutenberg nor Wemple has made a single mention of the reporters facing jail time.

"Top Journalists Warn of Threats to Press Freedom Under Trump," warned Stelter (11/22/17) right after Trump's election. Citing his boss (and the person most responsible for Trump) CNN head Jeff Zucker and his colleague Christiane Amanpour, Stelter sounded the alarm on the authoritarian tendencies of the incoming Trump regime.

Jim Rutenberg (7/2/17) later joined in with a Fourth of July-themed breakdown of press freedoms under siege by the Trump administration. Rutenberg lamented Trump's "personal attacks against journalists," mean GIFs and misuse of the "fake news" label, as well as Republican politician Greg Gianforte's body-slamming Guardian reporter Ben Jacobs. But Rutenberg, like Stelter, was entirely silent on the Trump Department of Justice threatening two journalists with generations in prison for the crime of reporting. For some unknown reason, this doesn't register as an attack on the press.

The Post's Erik Wemple -- though not as vocal in his warnings about Trump's attacks on press freedom as Stelter and Rutenberg -- still holds one of the most influential media columns in the country. His total silence also speaks to the broader near-blackout on the #J20 mass arrest and prosecution.

As FAIR (7/13/17) has noted before, corporate media have expressed collective indifference to the unprecedented mass arrests of the #J20 protesters, while moral-grandstanding at the Russian government for its mass arrests of protesters in June.

The Times' Rutenberg found time for not one, not two, but four different articles (9/18/16, 12/4/16, 4/17/17, 9/17/17) on the corrosive effects on American democracy of the Russian government-run outlet RT (Russia Today) -- a network that reaches less than 30,000 people per show, or roughly 0.3 percent of the ratings of Judge Judy.

Evidently, the topic of RT needed more attention, since profiles in PBS, Fortune, Politico (fourof them), Time Magazine, Washington Post (halfdozen or so), Mediaite, The Guardian, Bloomberg, Foreign Affairs, Wall Street Journal, Daily Beast, National Review, Christian Science Monitor, Slate, Washington Times, BuzzFeed, New York Times (another Times profile) and Huffington Post were presumably not enough. The fact that there are millions more Americans reading profiles hand-wringing over RT than actually watching it wouldn't stop intrepid media critic Jim Rutenberg from speaking truth to power...in another country.

Stelter and Rutenberg would not respond to FAIR's request for comment. Wemple told FAIR, "There are hundreds of worthy and important stories that I don't get to." But for journalists covering US media in 2017, the prosecution of Cantú and Wood is not just another story: These are journalists facing decades in prison for doing exactly what journalists are supposed to be doing -- covering the opposition to an administration that establishment media reporters have been warning about since 2015.

*Media watchdog Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR), journalist Adam Johnson

 

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Fair News Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

FAIR, the national media watch group, has been offering well-documented criticism of media bias and censorship since 1986. We work to invigorate the First Amendment by advocating for greater diversity in the press and by scrutinizing media (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Corporate Media Analysts' Indifference to US Journalists Facing 70 Years in Prison

North Dakota's War on 1st Amendment Goes From Bad to Worse

Iran Doesn't Have a Nuclear Weapons Program. Why Do Media Keep Saying It Does?

Ignoring Washington's Role in Yemen Carnage, 60 Minutes Paints US as Savior

As Democratic Voters Shift Left, "Liberal Media" Keep Shifting Right

Neo-Nazi Group Linked to Murder of British MP Has Long Been Ignored by US Media