Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment
OpEdNews Op Eds

Congress Should NOT Vote for a Military Attack on Syria to Punish Assad

By       Message Thomas Farrell     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 9/9/13

Author 38575
Become a Fan
  (20 fans)
- Advertisement -

Duluth, Minnesota (OpEdNews) September 8, 2013: After President Barack Obama publicly warned Syrian President Bashar al-Assad not to cross the red line by using chemical weapons on his own people, chemicals weapons were used to kill close to 1,500 Syrian people.

To be sure, the use of chemical weapons on Syrian civilians is outrageous and appalling.

- Advertisement -

Using Harry Truman's famous saying that the buck stops with the president, the Obama administration reasons that Assad crossed the red line and used chemical weapons on his own people, despite being warned by Obama not to.

But Assad himself publicly contests the claim that evidence shows that his armed forces used chemical weapons. Even if Assad is responsible for the use of chemical weapons against his own people, I would not expect Assad to come out and admit it. On the contrary, I would expect him to say instead exactly what he is saying.

However, apart from Assad's own self-serving statements, I have not seen evidence yet that would conclusively rule out the possibility that the rebel forces used the chemical weapons on Syrian people as a way to frame Assad.

But now Obama wants a limited strike against Syria to punish Assad, the alleged culprit.

- Advertisement -

But if Assad is the alleged culprit who is supposedly going to be punished, should he be targeted?

No, no, no, the U.S. does not want to try to bring about regime change in Syria. So Assad himself will not be targeted. After all, there is a civil war going on in Syria, and regime change at this time could destabilize Syria and bring about chaos.

OK, but will Assad's armed forces be targeted instead? After all, it would seem to be a proportionate punishment to kill 1,500 of Assad's armed forces.

But Assad might understandably interpret the killing of 1,500 of his armed forces as   military aggression by a foreign power (the U.S.), and he might understandably lash out at a nearby U.S. ally in the region (Israel). Moreover, Russia might support his claim that the killing of 1,500 of his armed forces by the U.S. is military aggression by the U.S.

So it might not be a good idea for the U.S. to kill 1,500 of Assad's armed forces.

So President Obama proposes only a limited attack on Syria.

But the limited attack on Syria is supposed to punish Assad. So what should the limited attack aim to do -- blow up key buildings and important military infrastructures?

- Advertisement -

But what about the people who might get killed when the U.S. is blowing up things in Syria? I know, I know, they will just be collateral damage.

Now, President Obama and John Kerry claim that American credibility abroad will be damaged if the U.S. does not carry out an attack on Syria to punish Assad for using chemical weapons against his own people.

But what do they mean by "American credibility"?

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It
Thomas James Farrell is professor emeritus of writing studies at the University of Minnesota Duluth (UMD). He started teaching at UMD in Fall 1987, and he retired from UMD at the end of May 2009. He was born in 1944. He holds three degrees from Saint Louis University (SLU): B.A. in English, 1966; M.A.(T) in English 1968; higher education, 1974. On May 16, 1969, the editors of the SLU student newspaper named him Man of the Year, an honor customarily conferred on an administrator or a faculty member, not on a graduate student -- nor on a woman up to that time. He is the proud author of the book (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was the Indian Jesuit Anthony de Mello Murdered in the U.S. 25 Years Ago? (BOOK REVIEW)

Who Was Walter Ong, and Why Is His Thought Important Today?

More Americans Should Live Heroic Lives of Virtue (Review Essay)

Martha Nussbaum on Why Democracy Needs the Humanities (Book Review)

Hillary Clinton Urges Us to Stand Up to Extremists in the U.S.

Matthew Fox's Critique of the Roman Catholic Church