Power of Story
Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -
Refresh  
OpEdNews Op Eds

Civil Advocacy groups disappointed by Supreme Court Order on Muslim Ban 2.0

By       Message Abdus-Sattar Ghazali     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 65550
Become a Fan
  (6 fans)
- Advertisement -

Civil advocacy groups are disappointed at the Supreme Court order on Muslim Ban 2.0. The Supreme Court of the United States Tuesday (Oct 10) issued an order in Trump vs. International Refugee Assistance Project dismissing the case from its docket. The case had been before the Court after a lower court blocked the President's second attempt to impose a Muslim ban. The Supreme Court's order Tuesday dismissed the government's appeal as moot, since part of President's Trump's ban expired two weeks ago.

This order returns attention in the case to the Maryland district court, where the plaintiffs in International Refugee Assistance Project case have already moved for a court order blocking the President's third Muslim ban before it goes fully into effect on October 18.

The Supreme Court's order does not affect the pending challenges to the new ban; nor does it apply to Trump vs. Hawaii, the case from the 9th Circuit, which blocked the refugee ban, a partial version of which expires in two weeks, in addition to blocking the now-expired travel ban.

In response to the Supreme Court decision the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), Asian Americans Advancing Justice, and the National Immigration Law Center, issued statements expressing their disappointment.

- Advertisement -

Avideh Moussavian, Senior Policy Attorney at the National Immigration Law Center, said the Supreme Court order doesn't change the chaos and confusion suffered by our communities when traveling under the Trump administration.

"While the court didn't issue a decision on the merits of the ban, we continue to fully believe that this iteration of the Muslim ban -- like prior versions -- is unlawful and unconstitutional. In doing so, the court was highlighting that this was a procedural decision," Moussavian said.

The National Immigration Law Center is exclusively dedicated to defending and advancing the rights and opportunities of low-income immigrants and their families. Its mission is grounded in the belief that every American-and aspiring American-should have the opportunity to fulfill their full potential regardless of where they were born or how much money they have.

- Advertisement -

Elica Vafaie, Staff Attorney at Asian Americans Advancing Justice, said called on everyone who wants to challenge these hateful Muslim Bans to join us in Washington, D.C. on October 18th.

"Regardless of the decision of the Supreme Court, the current Muslim Ban continues to cause real harm to Muslim immigrants and refugees every day. This administration has made multiple attempts to ban Muslims through Executive Orders, proclamations, and administrative policies. We have been here before with Japanese internment and the Chinese Exclusion Act, and we will not be silent," Vafaie said.

Asian Americans Advancing Justice is a national affiliation of five leading organizations advocating for the civil and human rights of Asian Americans and other underserved communities to promote a fair and equitable society for all. The affiliation's members are: Advancing Justice - Asian Law Caucus (San Francisco), Advancing Justice - AAJC (Washington, D.C.), Advancing Justice - Los Angeles, Advancing Justice - Atlanta, and Advancing Justice - Chicago.

Gadeir Abbas, Senior Litigation Attorney at CAIR National, said that we will be in court on Monday to stop the latest attempt to ban Muslim communities.

"The fight is not over and we are not giving up. We will continue to fight the new Muslim Ban, both in the lower courts and in the streets. We have been fighting the discriminatory and un-American actions of the Trump administration since day one and we will continue to hold the president and others accountable," Abbas said.

The CAIR is America's largest Muslim civil liberties and advocacy organization. Its mission is to protect civil liberties, empower American Muslims, and build coalitions that promote justice and mutual understanding.

- Advertisement -

CNN reported that Tuesday's order of the Supreme Court has increased the possibility that the justices will not hear a challenge to the President's March executive order this term.

First, the court dismissed a Maryland case in which a district court had temporarily blocked a key provision of the March order that halted travel from six Muslim-majority countries, the CNN said adding:

"The justices noted that the provision of the travel ban had expired and that the case no longer presents "a live case or controversy." The court said it expressed "no views on the merits" of the case. The court did not act, however, on a separate and broader injunction in a related case brought by the state of Hawaii. That case dealt not only with a ban on travel from six Muslim majority countries, but also a ban on refugees.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Author and journalist. Author of Islamic Pakistan: Illusions & Reality; Islam in the Post-Cold War Era; Islam & Modernism; Islam & Muslims in the Post-9/11 America. Currently working as free lance journalist. Executive Editor of American (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

U.S. Muslims condemn killings of American diplomats in Libya

Are we living in Orwell's 1984 Oceania surveillance state?

Pakistan's first Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan was assassinated by America

2001-2011: A decade of civil liberties' erosion in America -- Part One

85 percent Muslims voted for President Obama

2001-2011: A decade of civil liberties' erosion in America -- Part Two

Comments Image Post Article Comment

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
Connect with Facebook     Connect with Twitter            Register with Facebook     Register with Twitter

Comment:   

You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 
Username
Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

2 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments  Post Comment


BFalcon

Become a Fan
Author 28059

(Member since Dec 20, 2008), 17 fans, 3 articles, 13901 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

This reinforces my conviction that our problems started when the 'legal' establishment in this country 'abandoned' justice.

Submitted on Friday, Oct 13, 2017 at 3:59:00 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Lee Beacham

Become a Fan
Author 502584

(Member since May 30, 2015), 455 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

Muslim's seem to be so forceful in demanding America treat them as equivalents to American citizens, deserving of the equal treatment we enshrine in the Constitution underpinning our laws and policies. Are Americans welcomed with open arms and allowed to freely expose and practice Christianity and equal rights for women in Muslim majority countries? Of course we know the answer.

Submitted on Saturday, Oct 14, 2017 at 2:02:02 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

BFalcon

Become a Fan
Author 28059

(Member since Dec 20, 2008), 17 fans, 3 articles, 13901 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to Lee Beacham:   New Content

Is the US supposed to engage in 'race to the bottom' in human rights?

Submitted on Saturday, Oct 14, 2017 at 5:46:56 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
IndentIndent

Lee Beacham

Become a Fan
Author 502584

(Member since May 30, 2015), 455 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to BFalcon:   New Content

No, of course not. How about racing to the top by protecting U.S. Citizens in America while creating a safe/safer system that vets and discovers the most undesirable Humans that won't acknowledge our inalienable Rights. Sorry, Muslims have the reputation for some want to be terrorist and try to come to America to kill. We can't see into the soul so we have to take other measures.

And, in my opinion, Muslims need a lot of reeducation to fit into American society. We don't need any more people that don't want to fit in. We got enough of that type now. Who thinks more inner-cities high in crime and anti-social behavior is what we need? We already have too many "no-go" communities.

Submitted on Saturday, Oct 14, 2017 at 7:18:27 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
IndentIndentIndent

BFalcon

Become a Fan
Author 28059

(Member since Dec 20, 2008), 17 fans, 3 articles, 13901 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to Lee Beacham:   New Content

Many people (other than us) would argue the same things about Americans that you say about Muslims.

Don't "inner-cities high in crime and anti-social behavior" " need a lot of reeducation"?

"the reputation for some want to be terrorist and try to come to (America) (you put a name) to kill"

You just didn't notice the difference between a group and a small group within it.

Italians have Mafiosos, so?

Irish IRA was 'terrorist' so was 'Jewish' Irgun in British Palestine.

This country was contemplated on respecting an individual not trying to label groups, this is the most important premise.

"Those who choose safety over freedom deserve neither"

You may find higher percentage of people who don't 'recognize our inalienable rights' in the US government than in Muslim communities.

That train may have 'left the station'.

And you advocate destroying the remains.

Submitted on Sunday, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:41:51 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
IndentIndentIndentIndent

Lee Beacham

Become a Fan
Author 502584

(Member since May 30, 2015), 455 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to BFalcon:   New Content

"You may find higher percentage of people who don't 'recognize our inalienable rights' in the US government than in Muslim communities."

You said something I agree with. I'd say most of D.C. and all political-liberals are included.

And recognize Muslims in America are near 1%. God help us if it climbs to 12%.

Submitted on Monday, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:01:08 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
IndentIndentIndentIndentIndent

BFalcon

Become a Fan
Author 28059

(Member since Dec 20, 2008), 17 fans, 3 articles, 13901 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to Lee Beacham:   New Content

Not only liberals, my friend.

You do recognize that 1% of Muslims in the US (it's actually more) don't create any problem.

Why do you vilify them because there are few thousands of extremists all around the globe?

Submitted on Monday, Oct 16, 2017 at 1:25:39 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment