Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 1 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 7/25/10

City of Bell Residents Bear Blame for Outrageous Council Salaries

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   5 comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 33488
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Dean Hartwell

You want to start throwing stones at the City of Bell (California) for changing its charter to allow outrageous salaries for its council members? OK, but first let me say this:

The City did nothing illegal when it amended its charter in 2005. It simply changed its status from "general law" to "charter law." This change allowed them to ignore the limits that the state places upon the salaries of members of a city council.

How did they make this change?

They asked the voters. And, in a city of 40,000 people, a grand total of 336 voters showed up to vote, according to today's edition of the Los Angeles Times.

Some have pointed out that the ballot, which contained only the vote on whether to become a charter city, made no mention of city council salaries. That is true. But did the voters who bothered to show up really believe that something put on the ballot would have no effect if it passed?

The voters should have done a little homework. Were there no lawyers among them who understand the difference between a general law city and a charter law one? The distinction allows a charter city to make many of its own rules.

A check on Wikipedia would have told them: "A city organized under a charter may choose different systems, including the "strong mayor' or "city manager' forms of government."

I would call the Bell system a "strong city council" form of government, but the point is that with a little diligence, some of the voters reading their sample ballots could have sensed some big changes. Apparently, no one did much about it because the initiative passed.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).


Rate It | View Ratings

Dean Hartwell Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Dean Hartwell's book, "Planes without Passengers: the Faked Hijackings of 9/11," reached the top of Amazon's charts for large print books on history. He has authored three others: "Facts Talk but the Guilty Walk:the 9/11 No Hijacker Theory and Its (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact EditorContact Editor
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Stop Shooting Conspiracy Theory Messengers

Reverse the Revolution of 1963

Debate over Judyth Vary Baker's JFK Story Gets Record Response

9/11 Passengers Landed in Cleveland

Road to 9/11 Truth Goes through Cleveland

What is the Real Story about Jesus?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: