Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 19 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 4/28/19

China's Belt and Road Forum ends with signing of deals worth $64 billion

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   3 comments
Author 65550
Message Abdus-Sattar Ghazali
Become a Fan
  (8 fans)
- Advertisement -

China's high-profile 2nd Belt and Road Forum ended Saturday (April 27) with the signing of deals worth billions of dollar.

The forum attended by 37 heads of the state and governments concluded with an announcement by Chinese President Xi Jinping that cooperation agreements worth $64 billion were signed at a CEO conference during the Belt and Road Forum (BRF) meeting.

According to China Daily since 2013, when President Xi Jinping launched the BRI initiative, China has signed over 170 agreements with more than 120 countries. BRI has created around 300,000 jobs abroad, with trade between China and BRI partner countries exceeding $6 trillion.

The BRI projects are funded mainly through the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, Silk Road Fund and Chinese-funded banks, with the initiative's network now spanning five continents.

- Advertisement -

The BRI is seen as one of the most ambitious infrastructure projects ever conceived. The plan is two-pronged: the overland Silk Road Economic Belt and the Maritime Silk Road. The two were collectively referred to first as the One Belt, One Road initiative but eventually became the Belt and Road Initiative.

A joint communique issued at the end of the meeting highlighted that the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) cooperation should respects openness, transparency, inclusiveness and level playing field. It affirmed the respect for sovereignty.

"We respect sovereignty and territorial integrity of each other and affirm that each country has the right and primary responsibility to define its development strategies in accordance with its national priorities and legislation," it said adding:

- Advertisement -

"Determined to pursue trade and investment liberalization and facilitation, we aspire to further open our markets, reject protectionism, unilateralism and other measures that are incompatible with WTO rules. We highlight the importance of special and differential treatment in accordance with WTO agreements."

Who attended?

Those who attended the Second Belt and Road Forum in Beijing (April 25-28, 2019) meeting included Russian President Vladimir Putin and heads of several Asian, African and Latin American countries besides heads of the UN and the IMF. Beijing hosted 5,000 guests from 150 countries, as well as 90 international organizations.

The 37 heads of state and government attending the BRI Forum included 16 from Asia (Brunei, Cambodia, Laos, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Malaysia, Mongolia, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, Tajikistan, Thailand, Uzbekistan and Vietnam), 12 from Europe (Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Portugal, Russia, Serbia and Switzerland) and five from Africa (Djibouti, Egypt, Ethiopia, Kenya and Mozambique). The United Arab Emirate and Chile also attended.

The 2017 BRI Forum was attended by 30 heads of state and government including 10 from Europe, and 13 from Asia. In 2017, the BRI projects extended to 65 countries with a combined Gross Domestic Product of $23 trillion.

US & India boycott

Amid widening rift with China the United Sates did not participated in the Beijing BRI forum 2019. In 2017, Matt Pottinger, the National Security Council's senior director for Asia, ended up attending; this year even he didn't make the trip. This says a lot about the current state of U.S.-China relations.

- Advertisement -

It may be recalled that in December 2018, U.S. National Security Adviser John R. Bolton claimed in a speech that the ultimate goal of the Belt and Road Initiative is to advance Chinese global dominance.

Hong Kong-based South China Morning News, in an editorial said the United States, locked in a trade war with China, has been especially critical, claiming the initiative is about pushing geopolitical aims and making nations subservient through ensnaring them in debt.

"Trump refuses to join the belt and road scheme and has been pressuring allies to follow suit, although Italy recently became the first major Western economy to sign on. But others should follow the Italian lead," SCMN added.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Valuable 2   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Abdus-Sattar Ghazali Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Author and journalist. Author of Islamic Pakistan: Illusions & Reality; Islam in the Post-Cold War Era; Islam & Modernism; Islam & Muslims in the Post-9/11 America. Currently working as free lance journalist. Executive Editor of American (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

U.S. Muslims condemn killings of American diplomats in Libya

Pakistan's first Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan was assassinated by America

Are we living in Orwell's 1984 Oceania surveillance state?

2001-2011: A decade of civil liberties' erosion in America -- Part One

2001-2011: A decade of civil liberties' erosion in America -- Part Two

85 percent Muslims voted for President Obama

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments


Chuck Nafziger

Become a Fan
Author 24101

(Member since Oct 12, 2008), 15 fans, 6 articles, 14 quicklinks, 2017 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

The difference between Chinese efforts to increase trade, and American economic thuggery is profound.

Submitted on Sunday, Apr 28, 2019 at 5:05:51 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Nelson Betancourt

Become a Fan
Author 77911

(Member since Mar 31, 2012), 327 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

One builds, the other one destroys.

Submitted on Sunday, Apr 28, 2019 at 10:09:30 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Mohammad Ala

Become a Fan
Author 8028

(Member since Oct 1, 2007), 9 fans, 17 articles, 24 quicklinks, 721 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

China is no better than other super powers. China steals from countries that need help. China blackmails similar to other super powers.

China has used its veto power to purchase oil and gas under market prices but has never delivered on its promises. China has been a lousy partner.

China mistreats Tibetan people. China is a rough state, no different than super powers.

Submitted on Monday, Apr 29, 2019 at 3:09:13 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment