Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 5 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
General News    H4'ed 4/9/19

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): Will You Cave to Big Pharma?

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   3 comments
Author 1353
Message Martha Rosenberg
Become a Fan
  (84 fans)


(Image by dreamstime)   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

Most people realize how Big Pharma's greedy drug pricing raises our health care costs. Fewer are aware of how the greedy drug pricing also raise our taxes.

Currently, 60 "patient" advocacy groups--many clear Pharma fronts--are agitating to stop Medicare Part D health plans from scaling back coverage of "protected-class drugs." The proposal that has infuriated Pharma would let Medicare plans "exclude from their formularies protected class drugs with price increases that are greater than inflation, as well as certain new drug formulations that are not a significant innovation over the original product," said Seema Verma, the administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

"Patient" groups, quickly assembled by Pharma to protect profits, contend such drugs which CMS might consider not a significant innovation over the original product, are not "therapeutically equivalent" to brand name drugs. They are half right. A protected drug like Invega (used for schizoaffective disorder and schizophrenia) which costs around $1,239 for 30 tablets--$14, 868 a year--is certainly not equivalent to a cheaper drug. And we, the taxpayers, pay the freight.

- Advertisement -

Other "protected" drug classes include anticonvulsants, antidepressants, antipsychotics, antiretrovirals, and immunosuppressants; most, if not all, of the drugs in the classes have cheaper alternatives. Currently, the classes account for as much as 33 percent of total outpatient drug spending under Part D of Medicare.

In 2014, the Obama administration sought the same scaling back of Pharma gouging Medicare but was defeated by drug industry operatives like the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) which received $23 million in just two years from drug makers and does Pharma bidding.

The proposal "undermines a key protection for some of the sickest, most vulnerable Medic beneficiaries," sniffled NAMI lobbyist Andrew Sperling, one of many voices that defeated the proposal.

- Advertisement -

To fight the current, similar proposal Pharma is using the same tear-jerking tactics with high budget PR campaigns that aggressively give the phone numbers of lawmakers. Ending Pharma's high "protected" drug Medicare prices represents European style "socialized" medicine says one hysterical ad rationing is just around the corner! Another ad depicts the birthday party of someone in his 60's who would die--yes die!--if CMS ends Pharma's taxpayer-funded profit party.

Disallowing Pharma's obscenely high prices would "cripple innovation" says another ad, though the claim that high prices represent "research and development" has been thoroughly debunked. The prices represent what Pharma can get.

The six protected drug classes are not the only example of regulations Pharma has pushed through to be paid on the public dime. In Texas, a Medicaid "decision tree" called the Texas Medical Algorithm Project was instituted that literally requires doctors to prescribe the newest psychiatric drugs. Ka-ching.

If Pharma's "not equivalent" argument doesn't work, "patient" groups and medical associations serving Pharma are also whining that ending the profit party by allowing cheaper drugs would be "administratively burdensome" and allow "third parties" to make treatment decision. One of these arguments must work, right Pharma?

Meanwhile, the Americans for Tax Reform web site is also weighing in against "socialist" policies that would limit Pharma's profit party. The best thing "lawmakers can do to lower the price of prescription drugs and health care is to embrace free market solutions, which promote the competition that spurs innovation, improves quality [and] increases the number of available options," it scolds. Yes, the same free market that gave us 5 and 6 digit-priced drugs.

(Article changed on April 10, 2019 at 16:11)

- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

Rate It | View Ratings

Martha Rosenberg Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Martha Rosenberg is an award-winning investigative public health reporter who covers the food, drug and gun industries. Her first book, Born With A Junk Food Deficiency: How Flaks, Quacks and Hacks Pimp The Public Health, is distributed by Random (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Grassley Investigates Lilly/WebMD link Reported by Washington Post

The Drug Store in Your Tap Water

It's the Cymbalta Stupid

Are You Sure You're Not Psychotic Asks Shameless Drug Company?

Another Poorly Regulated "Derivative"--the Antidepressant Pristiq

MRSA and More. Antibiotics Linked to Obesity and Allergies, Too

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   



You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.
Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 
Username
Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

2 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments  Post Comment


Martha Rosenberg

Become a Fan
Author 1353

(Member since Apr 16, 2006), 84 fans, 832 articles, 567 comments, 2 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Many in Congress have had enough of Pharma's profit party. Let's hope they act

Submitted on Tuesday, Apr 9, 2019 at 7:01:54 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

John Jonik

Become a Fan
Author 10030

(Member since Jan 16, 2008), 15 fans, 38 articles, 2116 comments, 6 diaries
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

What will it take to belatedly, at last, expose big pharma for often being part and parcel of the popularly hated, virtually indefensible Cigarette Industry? That's via all sorts of tobacco pesticides, not to mention artificial flavors, preservatives, humectants and the link to chlorine and, therefore, dioxins.

Who, besides a sold-out "public" official, would approve of a drug made by a tobacco pesticide supplier?

Now we have Bayer, long-time supplier of tobacco pesticides, hooked up with Monsanto, supplier of Glyphosate/Roundup to tobacco plantations.

No secret...just ignored. Search "Glyphosate tobacco" and "Bayer pesticides tobacco". Easy.

(To go further, check out "Radiation Tobacco"...about use of rad-contaminated phosphate fertilizers. Still "legal".)

Submitted on Wednesday, Apr 10, 2019 at 12:20:58 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

John Jonik

Become a Fan
Author 10030

(Member since Jan 16, 2008), 15 fans, 38 articles, 2116 comments, 6 diaries
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to John Jonik:   New Content

To go further with searching...available via search is info at the US Patent Office re/

"Tobacco Substitute Material", about what a lot of So-Called "tobacco products" are actually made of...partly or entirely.

The commercial media driven "war on tobacco" is a distraction...a "war" on the victims...those who practice dreaded "smoking"...Not At All about exposing, condemning or prosecuting those who've secretly poisoned, guinea-pigged, and killed duped smokers for generations.

This charade is, of course, also a "war" on Mother Nature's un-patented, conveniently "sinful" natural plant...which has no lawyers. It's to be an "act of God" to get corporate entities out of trouble.


PS: When do we hear that tobacco is among the Top Ten Most Pesticide-Using crops?

How's that work with environmentalists and wildlife protectors, not to mention human life protectors?

Submitted on Wednesday, Apr 10, 2019 at 12:43:41 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment