Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   15 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Capitalism and Health Care

By       Message Donald de Fano       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 6/25/09

Author 30599
- Advertisement -
Sometimes it’s useful simply to state the obvious.  The only justification for using capitalistic principles for the distribution of health care is to insure that universal health care, by any meaningful definition, will never happen.  Period.  

 Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell observed, on Face the Nation, that "if the government is in the insurance business there won't be any other insurers, it's inevitable." His acknowledgement that the private health insurance industry would be “not be able to compete with a government option” is, for him, a devastating criticism, apparently based on his belief that the competition generated by our present, capitalistic, health care, system, is more important than the possibility that universal health care would be more efficient, less expensive, and more accessible that the present system. 

Neither the philosophy nor the practice of capitalism is compatible with universal health care.  Capitalism rewards financial success, and, obviously, health insurance companies that are driven to maximize their profits can most easily do so by compromising the quality of their service, selectively choosing whom to insure, and finding ways to limit or deny claims.  These capitalistic incentives have succeeded in giving us what we have today, a health care system that is of generally high quality for a diminishing number of people able to afford it.  Unless and until a meaningful public option is available in which positive health outcomes and universal access replace the profit motive as the driving force of the system, we will only be tinkering around the edges of the problem. 

- Advertisement -

 President Obama, strategically light years ahead of the Mitch McConnell’s in the congress, some of whom are Democrats, makes the point by packaging the “public option” as one choice among many, and putting the onus on the present, failed, system to defend itself. Unfortunately, given the rhetoric and posturing of political maneuvering, it is impossible to know the depth of his commitment to the public option.  It would be painful indeed to see meaningful health care reform sacrificed to some notion of political expediency.


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It


I am a retired boatbuilder with a fascination for political thought. Most of my life I cheerfully described myself as an "eastern establishment, knee jerk, liberal Democrat."

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

- Advertisement -