Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 6 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 2/25/13

Can Iran and the P5+1 reach an agreement on nuclear proliferation?

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   1 comment

by Ahmed E. Souaiaia*

Iran and P5+1 talks
Iran and P5+1 talks
(Image by ISR)
  Details   DMCA

Iran and P5+1 talks by ISR

Iran and the P5+1 group (United States, China, Russia, Britain, France, and Germany) are to resume negotiations in Almaty, Kazakhstan, on February 26. Their last meeting was eight months ago in Moscow. That meeting did not produce a breakthrough and that was expected because, in part, the U.S. was not prepared to offer anything of significance at a time when the president was facing re-election. With Obama re-elected and a new national-security team being put in place, both sides must feel that they can make some progress. Otherwise there would be no reason to try again. That much was signaled by the new Secretary of State John Kerry who encouraged Iran last Friday to make a serious offer and promised that "the international community is ready to respond". So what can Iran offer? Or more importantly, what can't Iran offer?
Here are some of the key points upon which Iran appears to be unwilling to compromise:
1. Iran's right to nuclear enrichment: Iran says that, before any agreement can be reached, the P5+1 must formally recognize Iran's right to develop nuclear energy and to enrich uranium under the framework of the NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty).
2. Serious offers only: Iran wants the P5+1 to make only credible offers in return for Iran's reassurances that the nuclear program remains peaceful and any actions that it may take towards that goal. Specifically, Iran finds the offer of spare parts for its aging Boeing airplanes in return for the suspension of uranium enrichment to be insulting.
3. No threats: Iran wants the U.S. and E.U. to rescind the unilateral sanctions they imposed on key Iranian products and institutions. Iran argues that Western states may refuse to deal with Iran if they choose to do so, but they cannot punish other countries for having trade relations with Iran.  
From the point of view of Iranian leadership, these three points appear to be the foundation for any agreement. It appears that all previous meetings have come to a halt because these points were not satisfactorily addressed in the eyes of the Iranian leaders. 
The P5+1 have gone to these meetings with two goals in mind:
1. Nuclear Technology: The P5+1 seem interested in denying Iran the capacity and capability to domestically enrich any amount of uranium to any level.
2. Nuclear material: The P5+1 want Iran to remove almost all nuclear materials out of the country and import all enriched uranium and nuclear fuel it needs instead.
These are the broad goals for each side of these diplomatic negotiations. But both parties have brought forth other issues. With the rise in sectarian strife in the region and increased instability in the Middle East, both sides hinted at broadening the negotiations to include other matters of common interest. But those issues are no more than useful enticement tools. The nuclear standoff remains the single most important issue for Western countries and for Iran at the same time.
* Prof. SOUAIAIA teaches at the University of Iowa. He is the author of a number of books and articles. Opinion herein are the author's, speaking on matters of public interest; not speaking for the University or any other organization with which he is affiliated.
Rate It | View Ratings

A.E. SOUAIAIA Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Prof. SOUAIAIA teaches at the University of Iowa holding joint appointments in International Studies, Religious Studies, and College of Law. He is the author of a number of articles and books. More information @
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The limits of objectivity: Qatari rulers reassert control over Aljazeera

The Women Of Al-Nahda: Faces Of The New Tunisian Republic

A Middle East run by Islamists: Should Western Powers Freak Out?

Libyan and European rulers' treatment of Blacks and immigrant workers

Proxy Wars: Will the U.S. end up supporting al-Qaeda-like groups in Syria?

Paradigm Shift: Occupy Wall Street redefines activism

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend