New Report by the Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning Finds Harsh Budget Cuts Put Quality Teaching at Risk
Cumulative cuts of more than $20 billion from California's schools over the past three years have made it tougher for teachers to help students meet increasing expectations for academic achievement and have badly damaged the state's ability to recruit and prepare new teachers needed for the future, according to the annual report on California's teaching workforce released today by the Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning.
"California's teaching workforce is running on empty," said Margaret Gaston, President and Executive Director of the Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning. "The disinvestment in building a top quality teacher workforce is at odds with rising demands for students' academic success. The fiscal crisis has so severely damaged the pipeline for recruiting and training new teachers that teaching quality may be put at risk for many years to come."
California's Teaching Force 2010: Key Issues and Trends is the latest report in a twelve-year effort by the Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning to help policymakers, the philanthropic community and others understand the critical need to strengthen the teaching profession in order to meet the state's ambitious goals for students' academic excellence. Research for the report was conducted by SRI International and includes an in-depth look at thirteen focus school districts and five focus institutions of higher education in California.
Amid intense scrutiny and increasing expectations for teachers, this year's report details the impact of the recent budget cuts and policy shifts on California's teaching workforce. The report also examines the state's system of teacher evaluation and makes clear the critical need for an effective data system to strengthen education in the state.
"These are very tough times to be a teacher in California," said Patrick Shields, Director of the Center for Education Policy at SRI International. "The expectations have never been higher, but drastic budget cuts are having a direct impact in the classroom and are damaging the systems of supports and resources teachers need to improve student learning."
Key among concerns raised by the report:
Tough Times for Teachers and their Students
While student enrollment has dipped in the past few years, it is expected once again to increase by more than 230,000 students between 2009-"10 and 2018-"19, with the most significant growth at the elementary level. Yet California has seen a recent loss of new teachers and dramatic decreases in enrollment in preparation programs and the production of teaching credentials. As aging teachers retire, California's capacity to produce the numbers of new teachers the workforce will need has been weakened and the state may again face a shortage. Consider:
- The number of novice teachers has declined by 18,000 teachers or 50% in the last two years.
- The number of enrollees in teacher preparation programs dropped by 45%, from more than 75,000 to fewer than 45,000 between 2001-02 and 2007-08.
- The number of teaching credentials issued by institutions of higher education in California declined by 35% since 2004, from 27,000 to 17,800.
- In 2009-10, 32% of the workforce was more than 50 years old, keeping about one-third of the state's teachers on track for retirement within ten years.
Unfortunately, the state's capacity to prepare teachers has also been damaged. In response to unprecedented budget cuts, CSU, the state's largest preparer of teachers, has had to reduce enrollment, increase tuition and make adjustments in staffing. These changes have removed potential teachers from the pipeline and weakened training, monitoring and support of student teachers as they begin their careers.
Over the past thirteen years, California has made significant progress toward the development of a robust statewide K-12 education data system. Recently, the system has suffered serious setbacks, and Governor Schwarzenegger's veto of funding for the data system has thrown the future of CALTIDES and CALPADS into limbo. Without a data system, the state is unable to track and analyze important trends in the workforce that would help to improve teaching, and stands to lose out on federal and private funding opportunities dependent upon having one.
"Without an effective educational data system, California is flying blind," said Shields of SRI International. "In the face of rising expectations and limited resources, it is critical that California develops a system that can provide the information needed to make strategic and targeted decisions to strengthen teaching and increase student achievement."