Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 3 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 4/20/12

CLOSE READING -- About that "surprise" attack: Ka-Bull!

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   1 comment
Message Russ Baker
Become a Fan
  (13 fans)
This article cross-posted from WhoWhatWhy

Copyrighted Image? DMCA

Welcome to "Stay in Afghanistan, Act 14." Also known as, "What a surprise attack!"

Here's New York Times:

"Western military and intelligence officials acknowledged on Monday that they were surprised by the scale and sophistication of the synchronized attacks in Afghanistan on Sunday, seeing it as a troubling step in the evolution of the Haqqani Taliban network from a crime mob to a leading militant force."

Hmm... Haqqani Taliban network? Crime mob becomes leading militant force? Do tell more. Times again:

"For the Haqqani network, a family of border criminals and smugglers that has gained an astonishing notoriety in recent years as a leading killer of allied troops in Afghanistan, the attacks on Sunday represented more than just the ability to paralyze the mostly tightly secured districts of Kabul for hours. They were proof that the Taliban offshoot could create the vast network of logistical support and planning needed to mount terrorist attacks without anything leaking to the intelligence groups so tightly focused on it."

[snip snip snip]

"While it is true that it is all but impossible to intercept every terrorist attack, there was not one attack on Sunday, but at least seven -- three in Kabul, two in Jalalabad, one in Paktia Province's capital, Gardez, and another in Logar Province's capital, Pul-e-Alam. There would have been dozens more people involved than just the assailants who struck on Sunday.

"The nearly 40 fighters who took up positions in vacant buildings in strategic locations in the four provinces were the tip of the iceberg, while the bulk of the terrorist activity that made their attacks possible was hidden: the financers, trainers, reconnaissance agents who chose the sites, logistics experts who arranged transport, and the weapons suppliers who provided what they needed for the attack."

So, the US government (along with the Times) is saying that "conspiracies" of at least some types apparently can be pulled off without anyone finding out before the fact. Verrry interesting. Continue, please....

"While Afghan officials said they thought that Sunday's attacks originated in Pakistan, where Haqqani leaders are in hiding, American officials said that unlike in the group's prior attacks in Afghanistan, Pakistan did not serve as the launching pad. 'Though the evidence leads us to believe that the Haqqani network was involved in this, it doesn't lead back into Pakistan at this time,' Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters in Washington."

Of course, Gen. Dempsey is the representative of the body that failed to detect anything going on. So we trust his word about where the evidence points? Also, his insistence that this is a domestic challenge in Afghanistan, not one to be laid to the doorstep of the NATO ally Pakistan, should be viewed with skepticism. The military budget for continued operations in Afghanistan is based on the assumption that the US and its allies are fighting enemies in Afghanistan, not the surrogates of other US allies.

"Mr. Karzai laid the blame for the failure to detect the plots at the door of NATO, above all, but members of the Afghan Parliament were more inclined to point fingers at the National Directorate of Security, Afghanistan's intelligence agency. 'There is a big question mark: How did they manage to bring all these weapons and all this ammunition and rockets and keep it here in the vicinity of the sensitive installation of Afghan government and international community?' said Fatima Aziz."

Whoops. So Afghan parliament members suspect their own government was... what? Incompetent? Maybe even complicit in the "successful conspiracy?" Or...let it happen? Dutifully reported by Times with no emphasis on this highly intriguing point -- which, if such speculation is just plain wacky, should have been marked as such.

"American intelligence officials view the Haqqani network, which operates in Afghanistan and Pakistan, as a strategic asset of Pakistan's spy agency in the Afghan theater. At the same time, though, the Haqqanis are in league with the Pakistani Taliban, who are fighting the Pakistani Army, highlighting the bewildering web of alliances and plots that spans the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan."

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Russ Baker Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Author, investigative journalist, editor-in-chief at

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Real Reason For The Afghan War?

The Military and Those Strange Threats to Obama

CloseReading: Are Joe Biden's "Gaffes" Accidental? Or Brilliant?

Tea Party Types say: Next Overboard, Lifeguards!

NY Times' Umbrella Man Exposed

JFK Umbrella Man -- More Doubts

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend