Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   7 comments
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

CA Appeals Court Strikes Down Ten Percent Ballot Audit

By       Message Rady Ananda       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 9/3/08

Author 2795
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)
- Advertisement -

An August 29th ruling by California's Fourth Appellate District Court bans Secretary of State Debra Bowen's regulation requiring a ten percent manual tally of ballots when election results fall within a half percent between victor and loser, and when the margin of difference between jurisdictions exceeds a half percent.  California will return to a one percent manual audit, as enacted in 1965.  The grounds for this decision rest on Bowen's failure to follow public notice guidelines required of all proposed "general" regulations that apply across the board.  Bowen also had the option of issuing this 10 percent audit regulation as an emergency, thereby avoiding public notice requirements.

After the 2007 scientific studies commissioned by Bowen confirmed that all the tested computerized voting systems could not be secured, Bowen decertified and conditionally recertified them, based on several conditions.  In October she issued her Post-Election Manual Tally Requirements (PEMT) as one of those conditions.  The County of San Diego (with other counties joining) sued on several grounds, including:

*  The regulation exceeded Bowen's authority (rejected by the Court);

*  A ten percent ballot audit is cost-prohibitive (also rejected by the Court); and

- Advertisement -

*  The regulation didn't undergo public comment and scrutiny (accepted by the Court). 

The Administrative Procedures Act (APA) mandates that regulations must undergo the following steps to become a legal directive: 

"The requisite procedures under the APA include providing public notice of the proposed regulatory action; issuing a complete text of the proposed regulation with a statement of the reasons for it; granting interested parties an opportunity to comment on the proposed regulation; responding in writing to public comments; and forwarding a file of all materials on which the agency relied in the regulatory process to the Office of Administrative Law, which reviews the regulation for consistency with the law, clarity and necessity."
General or Specific Requirement 

Secretary Bowen unsuccessfully argued that the ten percent ballot audit requirement was not a "general" regulation applying universally to all voting systems, and is therefore not controlled by the APA.  It only applies to specific voting systems (the easily hacked computers that the Top To Bottom Review studied: Diebold-Premier, Hart InterCivic, and Sequoia).  She also argued that because Los Angeles and San Francisco counties have more stringent audit requirements, the PEMT does not apply to them. 

- Advertisement -

The Court was unconvinced, claiming that because most counties in California use the easily hacked systems her regulation seeks to audit, it rises to the level of a "general" regulation and is therefore subject to APA.

Los Angeles is far and away the largest county in California, being nearly three times more populous than any other county.  San Francisco is the 12th most populous county. (Both based on 2006 statistics.)  Three other counties don't use the targeted systems: Lake, Madera and Sonoma.  

The Court traveled beyond the bounds of common sense when considering the popularity of the item being regulated.  Imagine fifty different snowmobiles are on the market, and three of them explode when impacted from the rear.  The state issues a regulation requiring those three snowmobiles be fitted with some protective gear that would prevent rear-impact explosions.  Clearly, this is a specific regulation.  Does it matter that those three snowmobiles happen to be the most popular?  How can 'popularity' enter into the definition of a general or specific regulation?

The Court's ruling further entrenches non-securable software driven voting technology to the detriment of the public and of democracy.   

Bowen may be well advised to reissue the PEMT as an emergency.  With two stolen elections behind us, a spate of expert reports corroborating that software cannot be made secure, and another election two months away, voters cannot rely on reported election results.  Apparently, they cannot rely on the courts, either.

- Advertisement -


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It


In 2004, Rady Ananda joined the growing community of citizen journalists. Initially focused on elections, she investigated the 2004 Ohio election, organizing, training and leading several forays into counties to photograph the 2004 ballots. She officially served at three recounts, including the 2004 recount. She also organized and led the team that audited Franklin County Ohio's 2006 election, proving the number of voter signatures did not match official results. Her work appears in three books.

Her blogs also address religious, gender, sexual and racial equality, as well as environmental issues; and are sprinkled with book and film reviews on various topics. She spent most of her working life as a researcher or investigator for private lawyers, and five years as an editor.

She graduated from The Ohio State University's School of Agriculture in December 2003 with a B.S. in Natural Resources.

All material offered here is the property of Rady Ananda, copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009. Permission is granted to repost, with proper attribution including the original link.

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." Tell the truth anyway.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

- Advertisement -