Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

But What About My True Conservatism?

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Dan Phillips       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   1 comment

Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Author 506419

Bill Kristol
Bill Kristol
(Image by Twitter)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

Once you get past all the noise on both sides, Donald Trump is clearly a different kind of Republican and he succeeded in the Republican primary and with swing voters in Flyover Country precisely because he isn't a typical Republican. To what degree Trump has fundamentally changed the GOP in his image remains to be seen, but Trump has clearly moved the party in a more economic populist direction. The party has become more overtly a party of the working class that better reflects its actual voting base.

With such a significant transformation, some resistance is to be expected. There remain many holdouts who still support the previous more ideological "conservative" version of the party. These are the people who groused that Trump's inaugural speech didn't say enough about high-minded issues like freedom, limited government, the Constitution, spending cuts, tax cuts, the debt, values, etc. etc. You know, the whole laundry list that Republican candidates have traditionally paid lip service to every election cycle and then returned to Washington or their various state capitols and resumed business as usual. Who has time for such pedestrian concerns as reviving our decimated manufacturing base and putting people back to work when there are abstract principles and generic policy preferences to yammer about?

The cartoonish Evan McMullin, former independent anti-Trump supposed representative of "true conservatism," remains the museum-quality specimen of such holdouts. He is still impotently flailing away at Trump on Twitter for Trump's alleged conservative failings while the actual Republican base is ecstatic about all the #Winning! in the first few days of the new administration.

The problem that the old-guard "conservatives" like McMullin and House Speaker Paul Ryan and the ideologues who defend the old paradigm have is that their cluster of issues, when taken as a whole, aren't particularly popular. Free trade, relatively liberal immigration policies, budget cutting, cuts to the marginal tax rate and the capital-gains tax, and entitlement reform are not a winning platform.

- Advertisement -

There is already an urban, globalist neo-liberal party. It's called the Democratic Party; it has free trade and lax immigration covered for urban cosmopolitans without the baggage of spending cuts, tax cuts that benefit the rich and the particularly toxic issue of entitlement reform, and consequently already has the urban elite vote locked down. The "true-con" agenda really only appeals to a relatively small number of basically libertarian-minded ideologues.

The working man in Flyover Country who is living paycheck to paycheck and fears that his job is going to move south of the border is just not moved by economic appeals to free trade and a capital-gains tax cut that are supposedly going to raise all boats, but he is moved by Trump's promises to protect his job from globalist predation and bring back jobs for his fellow Americans. The tone deafness of these true-con holdouts is remarkable. The GOP has succeeded with its stale orthodoxy in spite of its limited appeal because they have been able to rely on Red Team vs. Blue Team identity politics and relatively tight message discipline. Message discipline is why Trump seems so unique and is best compared to Pat Buchanan and independent Ross Perot who both ran in the '90s.

I don't begrudge people their political idealism per se, as much as I think true-con ideology has very little to do with actually conserving anything. I've been involved with third-party politics in the past myself. The system needs its political idealists to keep the process honest, but idealism is best understood as a rhetorical position, not a political program.

- Advertisement -
The true-con bitter-enders don't seem to realize that this is what they are, and that their cluster of issues, taken on their own and apart from Red Team/Blue Team dynamics, is a political loser. The idea that there is going to arise from the ashes of a Republican Party ideologically damaged by Trumpism a revived Republican Party or a new party based on free trade, cheap labor, capital-gains tax cuts, budget slashing, entitlement reform, overseas adventurism and mindless invocations of "our values" is delusional. This is an agenda that appeals only to catechized true-con eggheads. There is simply very little constituency for this program otherwise and no reason to believe there will be a more substantial one in the future.


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Dr. Dan E. Phillips is an Assistant Professor of Psychiatry at Mercer University School of Medicine in Macon, Georgia. His work has been published at many sites on the internet including The Economic Populist.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Trump is Right: NATO is Obsolete

Trump and the Rise of Republican Doves?

Jennifer Rubin: Liar or Dunce?

The Tin Ear of Free Trade Advocates

No Bolton at State!

The Weakness and Limits of a Jacksonian Foreign Policy