Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 50 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Bradley Manning lynched by the US government

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   2 comments
Message Pepe Escobar
Become a Fan
  (190 fans)
Source: RT

US Army Private First Class Bradley Manning leaves a military court facility after hearing his verdict in the trial at Fort Meade, Maryland on July 30, 2013. (AFP Photo/Saul Loeb) 

The verdict for Manning was predetermined, and the show trial in a kangaroo court -- a post-modern American remix of China in the 1960s during the Cultural Revolution -- just signed, sealed and delivered it.

The President of the United States (POTUS) had already said he was guilty. US corporate media had been screaming for three years he was guilty. Now the US government -- who criminalized Manning with "evil intent" -- has shown there will be hell to pay for anyone who dares to reveal American war crimes, which are, by definition, unpunishable. 

As if there was a need of additional evidence of the "bright" future awaiting Edward Snowden -- right on top of US Attorney General Eric Holder's pathetic letter promising Snowden would not be tortured if extradited to the US.   

All this as the Angel of History once more threw a bolt of lightning irony; Bradley Manning was pronounced guilty on no less than 19 counts by a Pentagon judge just next door to Spy Central, the NSA headquarters in Fort Meade, Maryland.

You're in bed with al-Qaeda

Manning is an Oklahoman -- just like music legend J.J. Cale, who died a few days ago. It was his decision to have his case heard not by a panel of military jurors -- a close match to the Spanish Inquisition -- but by a sole presiding military judge, Col. Denise Lind.

This was not exactly a sound move -- as Lind was duly offered a carrot to go with the stick, in the form of a promotion to the US Army Court of Appeals after the show trial.

Unsurprisingly, Pentagon prosecutors defined Manning as a "traitor," a hacker and an anarchist (yes, hackers and anarchists are worse criminals than al-Qaeda jihadists; after all, they are "our" allies in Syria). 

The show trial had a Kafkaesque imprint all the way through. The Pentagon hacks at first refused to release court documents. Lind perfected a torture practice of reading for hours from abstruse rulings. Only under threat of a lawsuit from the media in a civilian court, the Pentagon reluctantly started releasing the odd document -- obviously redacted to oblivion. 

The only accusation that would apply to Manning is unauthorized disclosure of classified material. Everything else is a farce. 

Manning's defense argued he was a legitimate whistleblower; he never expected the leaked information to aid the enemy. Yet Lind denied a request by Manning's attorneys to throw out the charge. She said he learned as a low-level intelligence analyst that the public release of secret information would risk US national security. The US government was adamant that Manning knew he was helping al-Qaeda when he released more than 700,000 documents to WikiLeaks. 

Lind even altered the charges when the trial was over to suit the US government. US corporate media was too busy to notice it, reveling in the New York mayoral race scandal. 

The fact that Manning was found not guilty of aiding the enemy still leaves him guilty on no less than 19 counts, including "wantonly cause to be published on the internet intelligence belonging to the US government" -- enough to possibly guarantee him decades of (military) jail time well into the 22nd century.   

After sentencing, it will be up to Maj. Gen. Jeffrey Buchanan -- the new commander for the Military District of Washington. He will review the case -- and in theory has the power to reduce Manning's overall sentence. Holding one's breath is not recommended. 

The enemy is you

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, correctly, said on Friday that if Manning was convicted of aiding the enemy that would be "the end of national security journalism in the United States." 
Still, the US government and the Pentagon will keep taking no prisoners in their campaign to criminalize investigative journalism from the inside (that's what Manning and Snowden did) and on the outside (as in WikiLeaks and the work of Glenn Greenwald). 

The hellish circular logic of the US government rules that to publish information on the internet means spying. So if the enemy goes on the internet, you are enabling the enemy. Manning being found not guilty of aiding the enemy but mostly guilty of everything else still delivers the message -- translated in decades in a military prison.   

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Well Said 2   Supported 2   Valuable 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

Pepe Escobar Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Pepe Escobar is an independent geopolitical analyst. He writes for RT, Sputnik and TomDispatch, and is a frequent contributor to websites and radio and TV shows ranging from the US to East Asia. He is the former roving correspondent for Asia (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

You Want War? Russia is Ready for War

Why Putin is driving Washington nuts

All aboard the New Silk Road(s)

Why Qatar wants to invade Syria

It was Putin's missile?

Where is Prince Bandar?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend