Kevin Zeese, a leader with the group, spoke to WL Central about Manning and the Call-in Day.
"The reason we decided to go to the White House is Robert Gibbs was asked about Manning at a press conference and gave a kind of we don't know anything about it answer," explained Zeese.
A press release for the Call-in Day suggests the White House has no concern for "Bradley Manning's extreme confinement conditions, or the fact that recent pre-approved visitors of Bradley's have been detained and interrogated by military police in order to block their scheduled visit." Zeese described the work of the network explaining it started shortly after Manning was arrested and then detained about eight months ago.
The group's next task was to "generate support for manning when his conditions of confinement came out that became a key issue." It was an opportunity for the group to discuss his case and make people consider whether he was a patriot or a traitor.
Zeese suggested the "necessity" defense, which really came out of the Nuremberg Trials, could be part of his case. Following orders, since then, has been no excuse for being complicit in war crimes. Much of the network thinks Manning was a soldier in the military, who saw war crimes being covered up, didn't want to be accused of war crimes himself, and so he decided to get information out to public.
It enjoys the support of professor Noam Chomsky, journalist Scott Horton, and, in addition to Code Pink, a number of other peace groups.
Photo by Bill Hughes
Toward the end of last year was when this movement around supporting Manning really began to develop. Letter writing, phone calling, demonstrating and petitioning all became tools for increasing the public's understanding of Manning's arrest and detention. And, on Martin Luther King Jr. Day, the group held one of their most successful demonstrations yet at Quantico Brig, the Marine base where he is being held.
Many in the group find that Manning's act was intended to start a debate on US foreign policy. The group has raised the fact that Manning "did not sell the documents and make himself wealthy, he did not take the documents to Iran or China or another competitor of the US. He did not even conceive of doing these things. " Manning can only be alleged to have leaked the documents for no charge to the media, to WikiLeaks. And so, the group largely concludes that he wanted to draw attention to US foreign policy Zeese illuminated how the contents of the WikiLeaks cables released thus far support the idea that Manning wanted more debate.
"WikiLeaks documents really lay out in the language of US diplomats how we are behaving like a rogue nation: that we bribe foreign officials, threaten foreign officials, we spy on foreign officials, that we work with dictators and loyalists unelected, that we work against democratically elected leaders in coups," explained Zeese. "Hillary Clinton's turned the State Department into a nest of spies. All of this has come out in these documents."
Zeese added, "The United States needs to debate that foreign policy and Bradley Manning if he did this is responsible for starting that debate. That's a patriotic act, trying to make us a better country."