On July 18, 2012, the Boy Scouts of America announced the results of a confidential, two-year review of its policy that explicitly excludes gays. The Boy Scouts' national spokesman, Deron Smith, stated that a special eleven-member committee came to the conclusion that the exclusion policy ""is absolutely the best policy'' for the 102-year-old organization.
Since when is unvarnished prejudice against a historically-maligned minority a good thing? Isn't it somewhat hypocritical for an organization that requires its members "to help other people at all times" to gleefully endorse discrimination against gays? In what sense is perpetuating age-old, irrational prejudices "helpful" to gays?
In case this might be news to the Boy Scouts, on September 20, 2011, the United States military officially terminated its Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy. In doing so, the US military officially accorded non-heterosexuals the same civil rights as heterosexuals, while also affirming the enlightened notion that it was no longer "morally straight" to discriminate on the basis of sexuality. That historic policy shift by the US military represents a resounding endorsement of fundamental democratic freedoms.
Be Careful What You Wish For
Morality is a tricky concept to define. Generally speaking, morality is relative and it is contingent upon the norms and values that are embraced by a majority of the population at a particular moment in history. As times and people change, so does morality. For example, the ancient Romans used to consider feeding Christians to hungry lions a pleasurable pastime. Also, following its inception, the moral climate in the US had no compunctions against treating Africans like slaves, women like property, indigenous peoples like vermin, and gays (or, members of the GLBT community) as deranged criminals.
America's democratic principles assert that, all people being created equal, everyone should enjoy the same unalienable rights: freedom, fairness, justice and equality. In practice, however, US democracy has all-too-often rolled out the red carpet to some (i.e., wealthy, European, male, property-owning, heterosexual, Christians) while dehumanizing, subjugating and abusing "Others." Though it took more than a century of aggressive social activism on the part of marginalized minorities, Americans gradually came to realize that there was a vast and inappropriate gulf between the USA's democratic principles and its practices.
Thus, slowly and grudgingly, American morality has transitioned from celebrating the abuse of marginalized minorities to castigating such malignant indiscretions In other words--although more than a few Americans lament the passage of "the good old days"--it is no longer considered "morally acceptable" to treat Africans like slaves, women like property, indigenous people like vermin, and members of the GLBT community as deranged criminals.
Three cheers for the (long, slow, reluctant) march of democratic progress! Wahoo.
The Boy Scouts have decided that, in spite of the march of progress, they are going to dig in their heels in a futile effort to preserve their anachronistic, undemocratic, and poisonously prejudiced version of morality. For the Boy Scouts, gays may not necessarily be deranged criminals, but gays still fall into the category of undesirable "others."
As a private club, the US courts have ruled that the Boy Scouts are welcome to take this last, lonely, loathing stand against civil rights. For an organization that has existed for 102 years and that congratulates itself for upholding the highest moral principles, it is sad that the Boy Scouts would flaunt such an appalling ignorance of history, morality, common decency and democracy.
In closing, I call upon all fair-minded Americans to Boycott the Boy Scouts until the Scouts quit foisting antiquated prejudice and ignorance on a new generation of kids.
*From the Boy Scouts page at http://www.scouting.org/scoutsource/BoyScouts.aspx
** The image of the Boy Scout Stamp is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person's official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.