Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 9 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Books Banned in Arizona - Latinos Fighting Thought Control

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   5 comments, In Series: Satire & Reviews
Author 3863
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Michael Collins
Become a Fan
  (120 fans)

Bad things are happening in Arizona, again. Good things too!

The extremist Arizona legislature enacted a law that just recently caused the banning of nearly 100 books from Tucson public schools. The list includes prominent Latino authors, plus Shakespeare, Thoreau, and James Baldwin. They even banned Zorro!

The real goal was to totally dismantle the Tucson school district's Mexican American Studies program. Mission accomplished. The program is gone. Not a class survived.

The enabling act, Arizona House Bill 2281, contains some lofty language. It requires that school districts teach students to "value each other as individuals." They cannot be instructed to "hate other races" or "overthrow the United States government." Promoting "resentment toward a race or class of people" or "ethnic solidarity" is forbidden. A bit overdone but it has some potential, right?

The law was just a smokescreen to cover ethnically based attacks on Latinos students in Tucson schools. Neither the banned books nor the dismantled Mexican American Studies program violated any of the provisions listed yet the law banned the books and ended the program.

Wake up call

Preoccupied with other issues, I'd missed this critical event until this weekend. A close friend since college, Michael Sedano, sent me this cryptic message: check out my latest adventures. My friend is part of the Librotraficante Caravan, or "book smugglers caravan," as Mike calls it. Latinos authors and others opened underground libraries in Arizona and environs. These enclaves of literacy offer the banned books to Latino students, no special permits required.

I first met Sedano in college back in the day. Aside from his many other fine qualities, I enjoyed a special benefit from hanging out with him. His literary taste was (and is) impeccable. He introduced me to Joyce, Samuel Beckett, William Burroughs, even Edgar Rice Burroughs. A few years ago, he helped start La Bloga, an online salon for leading Latino authors. Before that, he launched Read! Raza -- a program and web site that promotes reading and oral readings of Latino literature for K-12 students.

It makes perfect sense that my good friend hit the road with a stash of contraband literature headed for underground libraries. He's serving fellow Latinos and, in doing so, he and his literary comrades defend the rights of all of us to freely read, discuss, and think about our culture, history, and future.

But what's wrong with Arizona legislature and the state superintendent of schools who implemented this dreadful edict?

They shoot judges, don't they?

Federal judge John Roll of Arizona was shot dead in Tucson, Arizona at the same 2011 shooting that targeted Representative Gabrielle Giffords. Roll, a Bush appointee, became the target of anti-Latino racism when he simply allowed a lawsuit to go forward brought by undocumented workers against a prominent rancher. After the ruling, Roll was subject to filthy invective and death threats day after day by phone and email. In one afternoon, his office received 200 hostile calls

The attack on Judge Roll reflect the constituency behind the Arizona law that bans books and axes academic programs that serve a community (Tucson schools are 60% Latino). It never occurred to them that their acts caused harm and directly opposed to a long legal tradition against the formal censorship of ideas and books (with the exception of sexual "obscenity"). This applies to schools as well. In the landmark decision on the issue, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled:

"First Amendment rights are available to teachers and students, subject to application in light of the special characteristics of the school environment.

"A prohibition against expression of opinion, without any evidence that the rule is necessary to avoid substantial interference with school discipline or the rights of others, is not permissible under the First and Fourteenth Amendments." Tinker v. Des Moines Sch. Dist., November 12, 1968

Arizona's political rulers not only failed to read the Constitution, they ignored an independent curriculum audit of Tucson's Mexican American Studies program. The Cambrium Learning, Inc. audit found "no evidence" that the Tucson Mexican American Studies program violated any provisions of the Arizona law.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Well Said 1   Inspiring 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Michael Collins Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Ukraine President Once Agent for U.S. State Department

Worst President Ever - Barack H. Obama

It's official! You're on your own

Rigged Elections for Romney?

Real Unemployment at 23% - Dampening the Excitement

Humiliation And Death As A Tool Of National Policy