The mind boggles. Who ever would have thought, even in
their darkest, most paranoid dreams, that the Copenhagen climate change talks would be hijacked by a
handful of rich nations seeking to give themselves more power and riches while
imposing new burdens and new injustices on the rest of the world? And that
amongst this avaricious, duplicitous elite one would find the government of a
man who now bears the Nobel laurel for his unstinting dedication to the welfare
of all humanity?
Yet as unlikely as it may seem - the rich screwing the
poor? What next? à ‚¬" that's exactly what has happened at the great international
conference that opened this week in Denmark with the avowed intent of pulling
the planet back from the brink of a potentially fatal disequilibrium. America,
Britain, and, er, Denmark are among the handful of rich nations who have drawn
up a secret draft agreement that they hope to impose on the conference in its
closing days, when the elite's heavy hitters like Barack Obama and Gordon Brown
swan in to take a bow.
The plan would let rich nations emit twice as
much per capita pollution as developing countries, while the latter will be
subject to stiff new dictates from the rich in order to receive technical
assistance for climate change programs. The elite plan also calls for completely
bypassing the UN à ‚¬" the only international forum in which poor nations feel they
stand on a slightly more equal footing with the elite à ‚¬" and turning over climate
change funding and future negotiations to an "independent" board " most likely
run by that reliable appendage of empire, the World Bank. As the Guardian
reports:
The UN Copenhagen climate talks are in disarray today after developing countries reacted furiously to leaked documents that show world leaders will next week be asked to sign an agreement that hands more power to rich countries and sidelines the UN's role in all future climate change negotiations.The document is also being interpreted by developing countries as setting unequal limits on per capita carbon emissions for developed and developing countries in 2050; meaning that people in rich countries would be permitted to emit nearly twice as much under the proposals....
The draft hands effective control of climate change finance to the World Bank; would abandon the Kyoto protocol à ‚¬" the only legally binding treaty that the world has on emissions reductions; and would make any money to help poor countries adapt to climate change dependent on them taking a range of actions.
The so-called Danish text, a secret draft agreement worked on by a group of individuals known as "the circle of commitment" à ‚¬" but understood to include the UK, US and Denmark à ‚¬" has only been shown to a handful of countries since it was finalised this week.
..."It is being done in secret. Clearly the intention is to get [Barack] Obama and the leaders of other rich countries to muscle it through when they arrive next week. It effectively is the end of the UN process," said one diplomat, who asked to remain nameless.
And as noted in a follow-up story by the Guardian:
A spokesman for Cafod, a development charity with close links to some of the poorest countries in the world, said: "This draft document reveals the backstage machinations of a biased host who, instead of acting as nonpartisan broker, is taking sides with the developed countries.
"The document should not even exist. There is a UN legal process which is the official negotiating text. The Danish text disrespects the solid, steady approach of the UN process."
Another shock! Elites clubbing together in secret, seeking to circumvent legal processes for their own corrupt advantage? And, and, and.... Americans being involved in such dirty business?! Say it ain't so, O!
The Copenhagen talks have become captive of what we might
call the "Reform Syndrome"; i.e., the absolute, urgent imperative to put
together a crappy deal that gorges the rich and hobbles the poor in egregious
ways -- but which can be palmed off on a compliant media and a diverted public
as some kind of "reform." The important thing is that an illusion of positive
action be created -- while the same-old same-old keeps grinding on behind the
scenes.
This scenario has been playing out in the most crude and brazen
fashion during the "debate" over health care "reform" in the United States,
which has seen a "progressive" administration literally sell its "reform" agenda
to the very corporate interests that are the ostensible target of the reforms,
allowing them, again literally, to write most of the "reform" legislation
themselves.
And this has been the modus operandi of most of the
international climate change efforts, which have seen no appreciable reduction
in the pollution that is driving the destabilization of the planet -- but
has seen the creation of vast new "carbon trading" markets an other
speculative ventures for the rich and powerful to feast upon.
Genuine
climate change experts like Sir David King of the UK have been saying that no
deal would be far better than the kind of bad deals that are brewing in
Copenhagen. And that was before the secret agenda of the "circle of
commitment" was revealed. (The same dynamic applies to health care reform, of
course: better no bill at all than the monstrosity now wending its way through
Congressional intestines. Back off, buckle down, and start again.)
The details of the elite's Copenhagen agenda will now
doubtless now be modified -- or plastered over with a new coat of PR paint -- in
the light of the firestorm the revelations have provoked. But the true
intention of the rich nations in these negotiations -- as in all others -- is
clearer than a shining stream pouring down from a melting ice cap: the weakest
go to the wall. (Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
II.
But as Arthur Silber pointed out last month in his articles on
global warming, this is what our "complex, intricate... corporatist system,"
with its "dizzyingly numerous interconnections between "private" business and
government," does. This is what it's for. And, as he notes,
this is the system that we are trusting to resolve the globe-wrenching
problems of climate change.