Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Blame Canada!

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H4 11/4/18

Author 512338

Blame Canada stencil graffiti, Sidewalk, the Mission, San Francisco
(Image by Cory Doctorow)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

We can't completely trust politicians or doctors all the time. We all know some drugs are restricted and we often don't know the thinking as to why. We know that the politicians and the community get it wrong - they have different priorities, different philosophies, and their heartstrings are pulled through their personal experiences with addiction, their perceived risks and what to avoid. The natural impulse is to restrict the unknown.

But did no one else notice? Society unbelievably rapidly changed just in my very young lifetime, but not for the better in every case. We know we need to rethink and reinterpret what happened, because we're often more lonely, more isolated, and less connected to each other than we are to our screens. Some of us need those virtual connections - they are the addiction. They can't just give it up, until sustained social inclusion is achieved. This refocusing of society, it's always been there, and we know it needs to occur faster, especially as there are many powerful vested interests. The answers, as far as I can see, are within politics, by focusing on understanding, on the wellbeing of isolated young people especially, as well as other age groups, and focusing on language. Our circular debates occur simply because: everyone's story is different, their lives were different, their genetics is completely different, even if they look like you. Our external features are different all the time, our perceptions certainly different. Our brains therefore must be different. We think in completely different, seemingly counterintuitive processes, even from birth.

Despite this, we all know that drugs are here to stay. Medical drugs, illicit drugs and drugs that are legal and we tolerate. We're losing the battle with our children in the middle. What is happening with addiction? What even is addiction? It's a different concept for everyone. The planets circling around personal responsibility, upbringing, screen time, legalisation and regulation, crime, and harm minimisation are in miscommunication, in global, tribalist spirals. A lot of the time we just don't know, and I don't pretend to have good answers, there are so many schools of thought.

- Advertisement -

Surely we can agree that minimising harm, cannot just involve a network of complicated rules. Certainly that's part of it, but isn't that person that just lost their Xanax better off just getting it for that little bit more, then switching to alcohol, or GHB, perhaps forever? Isn't that person who just sold their Ritalin to their drug dealer for cash better off with more Ritalin instead of free cocaine? Isn't carefully manufactured dexamphetamine a little safer than methamphetamine? Aren't antibiotics some of the worst of them all? Why aren't they more restricted?

- Advertisement -

We thought cocaine was great. Then someone decided it was bad, and we're still having the biggest global war about it. We know we did similar did with opium (that's still going), alcohol, amphetamines, and now the internet.

We need to consider as many unintended consequences for as many groups as possible, when making our necessary networks of rules. Some of these rules certainly need to be relaxed, to avoid social exclusion and humiliation of addicts. We need to do it with careful rapid precision, to avoid perpetuating wars, turbocharging crime and destroying lives, with care and compassion, thankyou. We are allowed to disagree, we are allowed to be emotional, we can try and empathise with other people and not quite succeed. When we fail to find common ground, we certainly can still listen - over and over again. Does "common sense" as a concept even exist? Have you tried asking someone else, what "common sense" is to them? Sometimes what you have in common is dramatically more than you think, from my personal experience - when you share stories across traditional social divides.

What is certain is that the world's problems are simple to some, and complex to others. And we don't know exactly why other people see things the way they do. Political activism, works to a point and is necessary. However, amongst the societal change turbocharged by the internet, how many of us seek out a "dopaminergic internet reward" of confirmation bias? The big psychological question, in my personal opinion, is how often does activism and "opinion addiction" cause people to ridicule, react, and polarise further to the other side?

- Advertisement -

What I can see though, and perhaps you can too, is that the linguistic revolution of modesty and understanding is here. God knows where it started, perhaps somewhere around the 49thparallel? Or perhaps it was always there. It's rapidly charged, and will explode, because we can see the societal crises we agree about. And one country especially knows what to do. Involve everyone, individualise everything, even indigenous cultures and language. Learn from nature, learn from those you traditionally oppose: sometimes even they have fascinating unexpected points of agreement, when you catch them at the right time. Perhaps by speaking in another language, you can start to agree, finally. It must feel especially unachievable in the USA, but I'm an optimist, simply because:

I blame Canada!

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Peter is a medical registrar in Melbourne, Australia, with experience and interests in Infectious Diseases and Addiction Medicine. He is currently completing a Masters of Science (Infectious Diseases) at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

One language is not enough

My name is TREO

Blame Canada!

Anti-technology movements are not without serious risk

Can cars pay attention to planets?

Preventive healthcare strategies are a matter of social justice

Comments Image Post Article Comment

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
Connect with Facebook     Connect with Twitter            Register with Facebook     Register with Twitter


You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments  Post Comment

Peter Chisholm

Become a Fan
Author 512338
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Nov 1, 2018), 5 articles, 1 comments

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

  New Content

Facebook's all seeing algorithm just blocked me from posting on group walls just "I blame Canada" and the link to this Op-ed. All of the "walls", if that's what they're still called, were carefully picked out and to do with Canada. Only about 10. Even though I proved to them I'm not a robot, by pointing out all the different fire hydrants.

Dichotomy, happenstance. How amazingly interesting.

Submitted on Monday, Nov 5, 2018 at 8:42:29 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)

Devil's Advocate

Become a Fan
Author 500650

(Member since Nov 9, 2014), 7 fans, 1691 comments

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Reply to Peter Chisholm:   New Content

Stop using Facebook. Best advice I can give on that. It's time everyone thought very seriously about this.

Submitted on Monday, Nov 5, 2018 at 5:15:06 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)

Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment