Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 2 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 10/5/12

Biggest loser in the Presidential debate? - Jim Lehrer

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   No comments
Author 36058
Message Ted Newcomen
Become a Fan
  (5 fans)
- Advertisement -

(Article changed on October 5, 2012 at 08:38)

PBS front man Jim Lehrer turned in yet another dismal performance in the first round of the Presidential karaoke show which now passes for live debate in this country.

We don't know how much he was paid for last night's performance, but whatever it was it was way too much. He totally failed to control the questioning and came across as a star stuck schoolboy who was way out of his depth. You almost wondered if he was sitting on a pile of books and still wearing short pants as he attempted to invigilate the performance of the two candidates. Lehrer is clearly well past his use-by date and needs to be pensioned off.

- Advertisement -

The nation's talking heads and other media pundits in their rush to evaluate Romney & Obama have completely overlooked the importance (or rather lack) of the third person in the camera's view. Referees are a vital & integral part of any sporting event, and let's face it, that's what the Presidential debates have degenerated into.

Lehrer by his own admission chose the seven topics, he then failed to control the debate, and was a total irrelevance to the entire proceedings. We would have been better served if they had employed a robot or perhaps a glove puppet connected to a computer.

At least Obama had the good manners to recognize Lehrer's inadequacies and maintained the bemused indifference of an academic bored by the struggling efforts of a underachieving student -- which is basically his default mode these days. Romney on the other hand proved to be something of a bully and came over as a cross between an overly enthusiastic used car salesman and a preacher -- no change there then!

- Advertisement -

Most people watching the debate thought that Romney got the better of the President but anyone listening on the radio actually heard a more nuanced version in which Obama scored highly by pointing out that Romney's figures just don't add up.

Television has a built in flaw in which words & facts often becoming meaningless to the visual content -- it's as if our brains have still not evolved beyond those of our caveman ancestors in order to integrate sight & sound together. The glimpse of a tiger will always trump the rustling of the leaves when it comes to sensing a trap.

That said, Obama's performance came across as very pedestrian and lacked any passion. At certain points it was as if someone had flicked a switch and the President looked straight at the camera and like an automaton spewed out an over-rehearsed party line.

In reality there was NO debate! Both candidates support the status quo. Romney wants to turn the clock back to a previous Republican ascendency and Obama wants to bring on more of the same from his past four years -- both are recipes for failure. Voting for either candidate and believing the outcome is going to be different is a sure sign of the collective insanity which currently grips the electorate.

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Ted Newcomen Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Ted Newcomen is a citizen-journalist - someone who is tired of the lazy 'lamestream' media circus which is obsessed with the cult of celebrity and just recycles press releases for the establishment.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

US Government manipulation of the stock market?

How zombie banks and failing commercial real estate are impacting local economies

Catalyst Capital Group Inc - Not the smartest guys in the room!

US Intelligence raises spectre of upcoming civil unrest in United Kingdom

What will revolution look like in an era when we have more power as consumers than as mere voters?

Italian newspapers reveal how Berlusconi's government has been arming Gaddafi